Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww

Sadly, both her mother and father ought to watch their backs, but especially her father. I’m sure he’s next.


1,740 posted on 07/05/2011 4:00:44 PM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1728 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious

Definately....I thought when they left the courtroom, after the decision was stated, was a good thing to do...made the best statement presented....and actually spoke volumes more than the Jury.

Oddly, Casey turned her back to her daughter....and now her parents did likewise...I think they’ve had it with Casey.


1,751 posted on 07/05/2011 4:04:47 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1740 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious

The Anthony statement said they “accepted” the verdict. She is their problem, AGAIN. No wonder they got up and walked out.
“Shit, she’s coming home. What are we going to do?”


1,845 posted on 07/05/2011 4:49:03 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1740 | View Replies ]

To: onyx; All

With my tin foil hat on, I just had a strange thought.

When I first heard the verdict read, I was in TOTAL disbelief. ALL TWELVE jurors voted NOT GUILTY?? I kept hearing on the coverage how people were ALMOST CONSTANTLY hearing this jury LAUGHING while they were asked to leave the courtroom for brief periods in a room off of the main courtroom.

IMHO, it made it sound to me that they were becoming a “close knit unit”.

I got to thinking, what if they became REAL close with each other to the point of “covering” for each other?

It only would have taken ONE or more jurors to hang up the jury and give Casey Anthony a “Not Guilty” verdict. The problem with that happening is when the jury is “polled” at the end, those jurors would have to say to the WORLD that it was THEIR vote that did not convict Casey.

If there were one or a couple more “Not Guilty” jurors, those jurors would have REALLY had a problem for not convicting Casey when if not for their vote, Casey would have been found guilty.

If the jurors KNEW that they were hopelessly deadlocked, which means a 11-1, 10-2, 9-3 etc actual jury “poll” would expose and single out those “Not Guilty” jurors to nationwide (and maybe even internationally to) wrath and ridicule from those who thought Casey guilty, they ALL made a deal??

What if the jury became so tight, that they decided that since it only would actually take only ONE juror to make Casey “Not Guilty”, to cover for those one or more who were in the “Not Guilty” camp, the jury made “deal” to ALL vote “Not Guilty” to conceal the vote or votes of the actual “Not Guilty” ones???

IMHO, I consider it a STRONG possibility.


2,386 posted on 07/06/2011 3:44:08 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1740 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson