Property is part of your life, gained at the expense of time and sweat. If someone steals your property, they are taking part of your life.
No bad press for the illegals I suppose.
As it should.
Running out or walking in, either way if you are in a place that does not belong to you and you are in the middle of committing a crime...you are wrong.
Period.
“That may not be the best thing for society.”
Well, I can't think of a downside to it.
It would most likely thin and dilute the gene pool for the pieces of human excrement that decide to go into one's home and take one's possessions or do any manner of things to the person there.
I suppose, of course, there is always the problem of a future POTUS or a leader of some sort being eliminated before he had a chance to excel...or something.
Bleedin' heart stupid ass liberals.
Conversations with the 911 dispatcher should be much more concise and less conversational.
“The house next door is being burglarized, the address is...xxx, and I’m keeping my eye on the burglars.”
Hmm. According to this logic the Democratic party is a criminal conspiracy -- what does it stand for other than stealing property through taxation for the sake of redistribution?
Amen to that brother. All the “retreat” requirement did was embolden human predators. Every state with right to carry laws has lower crime rates than those who think one’s personal property is worthless.
“If someone’s in your house and they’re running out and there’s no issue with your safety and you shoot them, the castle doctrine would probably give you cover,” Ozanne says. “That may not be the best thing for society.”
Au contraire. Since lawyers and federal judges have decided to infringe on the rights of the individual States to execute murderers, and prisons are overflowing with violent and property criminals, it is the best thing for society to provide for immediate execution of those in the commission of a serious felony.
Bullets cannot be appealed by crafty lawyers to first the State District judge, then a panel of three judges from the Federal District Court, then to the entire Federal District Court, and then to the SCOTUS, again and again, over any number of petty issues most of which are heard by judges looking for an excuse to overturn the death penalty solely because they personally don’t *like* the death penalty.
Instead, when a murderer or violent or property criminal is ventilated, and they have vital organ failure or bleed out, the citizenry has won.
It is the best thing for society.
And if the perpetrators are illegal aliens solely in the US to commit crimes, or from out of State and unaware that what they are doing could very well get them killed, well, tough.