Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GreaterSwiss

Probably will happen. To be honest, I can’t understand why it hasn’t yet! Though I am not complaining.

It puts the local store at a disadvantage.


7 posted on 04/12/2011 1:07:26 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: redgolum
It puts the local store at a disadvantage.

Not necessarily when you figure in the shipping and handling charges on many internet orders.

12 posted on 04/12/2011 1:17:39 PM PDT by RINOs suck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum

In my case, the local store is NOT at a disadvantage because they don’t sell the items I purchase, such as antiques and collectibles, for instance.

Many of the new items I buy are also unavailable locally.


18 posted on 04/12/2011 1:25:17 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (A Jimmy Carter got us a Ronald Reagan......A Barack Obama will get us a Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum

sounds like a problem taxing authorities need to address on the disadvantage side. how is it that taxing other people is going to make them brick and mortar stores better? a better solution would be to make it more appealing for brick and mortar stores to exist. perhaps the owners of the stores could have their taxes lowered, so that they could be more competitive.

why is that so many politicians try to tax other people prosperity? It just doesn’t work. maybe the good people of wyoming enjoy purchasing things over the internet. if they don’t want to buy the brick and mortar stores, maybe the government of wyoming needs to make purchase is a brick and mortar stores more appealing to the consumers.


19 posted on 04/12/2011 1:27:40 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum

Local stores refuse to carry what I want to buy in many cases. It’s not even a matter of price, it’s a matter of ‘cannot get locally at any price.’

I should be taxed because my local stores are run by morons and refuse to stock what I want?


22 posted on 04/12/2011 1:45:06 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum
It puts the local store at a disadvantage.

Its a different business model that market forces should be sorting out. IF there is a disadvantage, then why should the government be the profiteer of sorting out the difference when the market would do, and is doing, that quite well. Besides, government does NOT need any new monies that they just spend on crap. They need to be shrunken down to a manageable size.

23 posted on 04/12/2011 1:46:36 PM PDT by C210N (0bama, Making the US safe for Global Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum
It puts the local store at a disadvantage.

No, the local store can open a website and sell on the internet. I have both a small retail shop and a website. Very common for locals to purchase and pay online and let me know they will pick it up in person. I have "local pick up" as an option.

I also ship worldwide. Anybody with something to sell can do the same. Easy peasy.

38 posted on 04/12/2011 2:40:36 PM PDT by Valpal1 ("No clever arrangement of bad eggs ever made a good omelet." ~ C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum

who do you think IS the local store?

The internet has allowed stores that were once LIMITED to main street to branch out BEYOND the serfdom of main street.

Mom and Pop stores ARE the internet.


43 posted on 04/12/2011 3:11:48 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum

How so?? When someone shops online, they are paying MORE for shipping than they would for sales tax. Stock the items people want to buy and local stores will have no problem.


51 posted on 04/12/2011 3:52:19 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum; All

So?? Why should there be fairness??


58 posted on 04/12/2011 4:44:41 PM PDT by KevinDavis (3rd Parties are for losers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum
It puts the local store at a disadvantage.

Every "local store" in America sells on the Internet. This "protecting main street" BS is being done to squeeze more dollars out of people and for no other reason.

84 posted on 04/13/2011 8:34:58 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Rage all you want, looters & moochers, but the gods of the copybook headings are your masters now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson