Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic senator wants Internet sales taxes (& Republican Enzi-WY also!)
Cnet ^ | 4/12/11 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 04/12/2011 12:55:13 PM PDT by GreaterSwiss

Update 10:30 a.m. PT: I've heard back from Sen. Mike Enzi's office. It sent me e-mail this morning saying: "Senator Enzi plans to co-sponsor the Main Street Fairness bill with Senator Durbin. As far as a timeline or drafts, you'll have to check with Senator Durbin's office."

Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20052999-281.html#ixzz1JL8wTRdz A Democratic senator is preparing to introduce legislation that aims to end the golden era of tax-free Internet shopping.

The proposal--expected to be made public soon after Tax Day--would rewrite the ground rules for Internet and mail order sales by eliminating the ability of Americans to shop at Web sites like Amazon.com and Overstock.com without paying state sales taxes.

Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second most senior Senate Democrat, will introduce the bill after the Easter recess, a Democratic aide told CNET.

"Why should out-of-state companies that sell their products online have an unfair advantage over Main Street bricks-and-mortar businesses?" Durbin said in a speech in Collinsville, Ill., in February. "Out-of-state companies that aren't paying their fair share of taxes are sticking Illinois residents and businesses with the tab."

At the moment, Americans who shop over the Internet from out-of-state vendors aren't always required to pay sales taxes at the time of purchase. Californians buying books from Amazon.com or cameras from Manhattan's B&H Photo, for example, won't pay the sales taxes at checkout time that they would if shopping at a local mall--which is what Durbin means by giving online retailers an "unfair advantage."

On the other hand, there are some 7,500 different taxing jurisdictions in the United States, each with a set of very precise rules describing what can and can't be taxed and at what rate. That makes it challenging terrain for retailers to navigate.

Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20052999-281.html#ixzz1JL903e1g

(Excerpt) Read more at news.cnet.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; US: California; US: Illinois; US: New York
KEYWORDS: california; illinois; newyork; taxes; theft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: Recovering_Democrat

The retail association gave Durbin (Mafia) lots of donations...


21 posted on 04/12/2011 1:40:33 PM PDT by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Local stores refuse to carry what I want to buy in many cases. It’s not even a matter of price, it’s a matter of ‘cannot get locally at any price.’

I should be taxed because my local stores are run by morons and refuse to stock what I want?


22 posted on 04/12/2011 1:45:06 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
It puts the local store at a disadvantage.

Its a different business model that market forces should be sorting out. IF there is a disadvantage, then why should the government be the profiteer of sorting out the difference when the market would do, and is doing, that quite well. Besides, government does NOT need any new monies that they just spend on crap. They need to be shrunken down to a manageable size.

23 posted on 04/12/2011 1:46:36 PM PDT by C210N (0bama, Making the US safe for Global Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss
...to be announced "after Tax Day"

Who'da guessed?

24 posted on 04/12/2011 1:48:04 PM PDT by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

Clean out the scum that inhabits both bodies of Congress.

These guys qualify as scum.


25 posted on 04/12/2011 1:51:05 PM PDT by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill
They are required to pay use tax if their state has a sales tax.

This is true, but essentially nobody actually does it.

26 posted on 04/12/2011 1:54:25 PM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: C210N
Its a different business model that market forces should be sorting out. IF there is a disadvantage, then why should the government be the profiteer of sorting out the difference when the market would do, and is doing, that quite well.

I think the argument is that the government *is* sorting out winners and losers under the current system, and this would put the government back in a "neutral" position.

That said, I don't like the bill, and would not support it unless it included substantial cuts in other taxes.

27 posted on 04/12/2011 1:57:44 PM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

So as an Ebay seller I’m going to have to get sales tax licenses and send in taxes to all of these different jurisdictions? BS, aint gonna happen, see if they want to extradite me to each state for about $50/year.


28 posted on 04/12/2011 2:00:27 PM PDT by conservaterian (Sarah/DeMint '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

Looks like another super-RINO has been unmasked!!


29 posted on 04/12/2011 2:03:02 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

Looks like another super-RINO has been unmasked!!


30 posted on 04/12/2011 2:05:31 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

You’re always paying for shipping fees, it’s just hidden in physical stores. Much like the corporate income tax.


31 posted on 04/12/2011 2:07:14 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

Good ole government, always wanting to stick its nose where it doesn’t belong.


32 posted on 04/12/2011 2:13:22 PM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
You’re always paying for shipping fees, it’s just hidden in physical stores.

The shipping fees per item are not nearly the same as the cost of shipping a single item to the buyer. Besides, the internet retailer also has their hidden shipping fees.
33 posted on 04/12/2011 2:16:26 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
Sales tax will be the death of internet sales.

In most cases it is the only reason to buy on the internet.

Which is why big-box retailers are behind the push for this.

34 posted on 04/12/2011 2:30:22 PM PDT by Spirochete (Sic transit gloria mundi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
WTF? Here is the solution: lower state taxes or get rid of them. why is the solution always to raise taxes on other sales?

Thank you!! Fk. I want to blow my brains out the more I keep reading, hearing that raising taxes is the only fair solution to this or that.

35 posted on 04/12/2011 2:31:08 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

This isn’t about a federal tax, it’s about congress authorizing the states to force business in other states to remit sales tax to them even thought those businesses use none of the distant states resources.

It’s just more revenue for the states to waste.

NO!


36 posted on 04/12/2011 2:33:02 PM PDT by Valpal1 ("No clever arrangement of bad eggs ever made a good omelet." ~ C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

See, elections don’t matter.


37 posted on 04/12/2011 2:38:58 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
It puts the local store at a disadvantage.

No, the local store can open a website and sell on the internet. I have both a small retail shop and a website. Very common for locals to purchase and pay online and let me know they will pick it up in person. I have "local pick up" as an option.

I also ship worldwide. Anybody with something to sell can do the same. Easy peasy.

38 posted on 04/12/2011 2:40:36 PM PDT by Valpal1 ("No clever arrangement of bad eggs ever made a good omelet." ~ C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss
fair

Theres that word again..It's been wafting from Dem pieholes the last week or so more than usual.

39 posted on 04/12/2011 2:45:48 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss
Insane. I live in a rural area. The things I order I can't get locally and I pay shipping and handling. Damn, will this never stop?!
40 posted on 04/12/2011 2:52:40 PM PDT by ladyvet ( I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson