Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin rips Supreme Court decision on Westboro Baptist Church: lacks 'common sense'
Ny Daily News ^ | March 3, 2011 | Aliyah Shahid

Posted on 03/03/2011 10:01:14 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY

Sarah Palin slammed the Supreme Court's ruling that members of the controversial Westboro Baptist Church can protest homosexuality by continuing to picket military funerals.

"Common sense & decency absent as wacko 'church' allowed hate msgs spewed@ soldiers' funerals but we can't invoke God's name in public square," the former Alaska governor tweeted .

On Wednesday, the court voted 8 to 1 in favor of the Topeka, Kan., church, which has demonstrated at thousands of funerals and events across the country. It has been labeled a lunatic fringe for its tactics -- including protests at the funerals of U.S. soldiers and declarations that war deaths are God's punishment for the country's tolerance of gays.

Justice Samuel Alito was the lone dissenter in the case that pits free speech against privacy rights. He argued the First Amendment does not protect Americans who launch "vicious verbal attacks that make no contribution to public debate" during "a time of intense emotional sensitivity."

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: courtisright; freespeech; notafederalissue; palin; sarahpalin; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 03/03/2011 10:01:19 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
He argued the First Amendment does not protect Americans who launch "vicious verbal attacks that make no contribution to public debate" during "a time of intense emotional sensitivity."

I disagree with him, but he's the one wearing the robe.

The Westboro church is a pack of bigots, idiots, and fools. But even fools have the right to speak in our society. The SC got this one right.

Unfortunate that our society has decayed to the point where we even need to discuss things like this, from either standpoint.

2 posted on 03/03/2011 10:11:57 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I know this is an outrage to some.

But, it opens the door to killing off the concept of politically correct speech.

This is the first step in ending the hideous speech codes enforced by the left.


3 posted on 03/03/2011 10:14:29 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I know this is an outrage to some.

But, it opens the door to killing off the concept of politically correct speech.

This is the first step in ending the hideous speech codes enforced by the left.


4 posted on 03/03/2011 10:14:44 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill

I was a firm backer of sarah, but this leaves me with little room to maneuver....this is a first amendment issue, the supremes got it right, however distasteful this so called “church” is.....if I disagree with her over something as fundamental as the first amendment, I can no longer back her


5 posted on 03/03/2011 10:18:44 AM PST by joe fonebone (The House has oversight of the Judiciary...why are the rogue judges not being impeached?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Palin just shot herself in the foot. Just because the speech is offensive doesn’t mean its not protected, especially political speech.


6 posted on 03/03/2011 10:18:59 AM PST by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Free speech does have its consequences. If the WBC incites a riot or incurs an attack on themselves it’s their fault.


7 posted on 03/03/2011 10:20:28 AM PST by ReverendJames (Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

What this church does is not decent. But the issue is NOT about decency, but freedom of speech. Palin just lost a lot of points with me on this.


8 posted on 03/03/2011 10:21:06 AM PST by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY; Liz
Sarah's wrong on this one. Judge Napalitano is right. We do not need to add any codicils to the First Amendment, lest that turn around a bite us! Remember, you can be charged criminally in Canada for criticizing Islam. Cases like this are the first step in that direction unless we hold firm on the Constitution.

If we really want to bring down Westboro, we NEED TO FIND OUT WHO PAYS THEIR BILLS.

I am highly suspicious of their "sincerity"--and suspect that they are getting their money from places like Center for American Progress, Soros, etc. through some NGO.

Does anyone understand just how expensive it is to travel all over the country and protest? Going to just a couple of tea parties cost me trouble and money. This ersatz "church" is made up of a family of lawyers.

Follow the money. This is a provocation designed to push us into limiting our own free speech, for the long-term benefit of the LEFT.

9 posted on 03/03/2011 10:22:27 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

I came on this thread ready to say the same, but if all she said was really: “Common sense & decency absent as wacko ‘church’ allowed hate msgs spewed@ soldiers’ funerals but we can’t invoke God’s name in public square”, then that’s hardly the same as what the headline implies.


10 posted on 03/03/2011 10:23:27 AM PST by Sloth (If a tax cut constitutes "spending" then every time I don't rob a bank should count as a "desposit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Sloth

Yup, that’s what she said. She NEVER mentioned the SCOTUS.


12 posted on 03/03/2011 10:26:19 AM PST by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

The SCOTUS decision tells me that I get to say anything, anywhere, any time.


13 posted on 03/03/2011 10:28:45 AM PST by Pecos (Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Think about this for a minute, before you decide that her opinion on this corner case is fatal.

WBC has deliberately set themselves up so that they are engaging in essentially commercial speech (fishing for lawsuits) under the guise of political/religious speech. WBC has deliberately chosen to set up this issue.

I’m certain that WBC would consider your reaction a win for their side.

Consider the entirety of her body of opinion, rather than just her pronouncement on this case.


14 posted on 03/03/2011 10:29:02 AM PST by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I agree. The “Tweet” isn’t 100% clear. I read it as: It doesn’t make sense when we stand up to protect hate speech, but don’t allow God to be mentioned...”

I’m not sure she was attacking the SCOTUS’s decision though...


15 posted on 03/03/2011 10:31:21 AM PST by Portnoy (Follow me on Twitter @gadsdenrattlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Just went to the website to read the entire article...you are indeed correct!!!! Thank you, as I now can and will continue to back Sarah.....the levels that which the msm will stoop to ( damnit, I should have known better! )I guess that one has to remain vigilant in order to not be fooled..


16 posted on 03/03/2011 10:32:45 AM PST by joe fonebone (The House has oversight of the Judiciary...why are the rogue judges not being impeached?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Hacklehead

Palin just shot herself in the foot.

Again.

She’s done this several times...shame, really.

Note to Sarah: we do NOT limit speech we do not like or do not agree with. Thats what lefties do.


18 posted on 03/03/2011 10:34:21 AM PST by Adder (Part 1 Accomplished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
This is exactly why Palin looks bad here. She is unaware that the Constitutional separation of Church and State is already provided for under the Establishment Clause and is not connected to the 1st ammendment under the right to Free Speech as she is assuming here.

She just needs to keep her mouth shut some times, like the “Blood Libel” mess she created for herself.

19 posted on 03/03/2011 10:34:30 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Sorry for my pissed-off post. You did your due diligence. I’ll ask the mod to delete mine.


20 posted on 03/03/2011 10:35:00 AM PST by agere_contra (Whenever a Liberal admits to something: he is covering up something far worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson