Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/03/2011 10:01:19 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Free ThinkerNY
He argued the First Amendment does not protect Americans who launch "vicious verbal attacks that make no contribution to public debate" during "a time of intense emotional sensitivity."

I disagree with him, but he's the one wearing the robe.

The Westboro church is a pack of bigots, idiots, and fools. But even fools have the right to speak in our society. The SC got this one right.

Unfortunate that our society has decayed to the point where we even need to discuss things like this, from either standpoint.

2 posted on 03/03/2011 10:11:57 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I know this is an outrage to some.

But, it opens the door to killing off the concept of politically correct speech.

This is the first step in ending the hideous speech codes enforced by the left.


3 posted on 03/03/2011 10:14:29 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I know this is an outrage to some.

But, it opens the door to killing off the concept of politically correct speech.

This is the first step in ending the hideous speech codes enforced by the left.


4 posted on 03/03/2011 10:14:44 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Palin just shot herself in the foot. Just because the speech is offensive doesn’t mean its not protected, especially political speech.


6 posted on 03/03/2011 10:18:59 AM PST by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Free speech does have its consequences. If the WBC incites a riot or incurs an attack on themselves it’s their fault.


7 posted on 03/03/2011 10:20:28 AM PST by ReverendJames (Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

What this church does is not decent. But the issue is NOT about decency, but freedom of speech. Palin just lost a lot of points with me on this.


8 posted on 03/03/2011 10:21:06 AM PST by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY; Liz
Sarah's wrong on this one. Judge Napalitano is right. We do not need to add any codicils to the First Amendment, lest that turn around a bite us! Remember, you can be charged criminally in Canada for criticizing Islam. Cases like this are the first step in that direction unless we hold firm on the Constitution.

If we really want to bring down Westboro, we NEED TO FIND OUT WHO PAYS THEIR BILLS.

I am highly suspicious of their "sincerity"--and suspect that they are getting their money from places like Center for American Progress, Soros, etc. through some NGO.

Does anyone understand just how expensive it is to travel all over the country and protest? Going to just a couple of tea parties cost me trouble and money. This ersatz "church" is made up of a family of lawyers.

Follow the money. This is a provocation designed to push us into limiting our own free speech, for the long-term benefit of the LEFT.

9 posted on 03/03/2011 10:22:27 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

The SCOTUS decision tells me that I get to say anything, anywhere, any time.


13 posted on 03/03/2011 10:28:45 AM PST by Pecos (Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

File under “Be careful what you wish for.”


27 posted on 03/03/2011 10:42:18 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
As a Sarah Palin follower I am dismayed that she took this approach.
If people thought this through instead of following their “feelings” They would understand that other “feelings” will lead to more and more laws against free speech.
It can be legislated to keep these scums from attending funerals of our soldiers. Time for some legislation about parameters around services?
28 posted on 03/03/2011 10:46:30 AM PST by lucky american (If you think the Libs care about your health.....LOLOLOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Everyone who thinks the SC was right in this case is a wimp.

Palin is right.

The left has a double standard.

They always get their way, right or wrong.

All the right does is acquiesce.

Enough.

Stop bending and hairsplitting and pretending it is principle.

It is cowardice.

Stand up and fight back.

The a$$holes on the other side don't care about principles.

We need to get ugly, and now, with these commies.

29 posted on 03/03/2011 10:46:48 AM PST by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
This is the second Supreme Court decision that Sarah has disagreed with for purely emotional reasons. The closer it comes time to get serious, the more she's losing her luster -- for me, anyways.

I was a big Palin fan. When she made her first speech (in Hong Kong, I believe) after quitting the governorship, I really thought she was on her way. She's gotten off-track. A presidential candidate must defend freedom of speech.

34 posted on 03/03/2011 11:04:30 AM PST by BfloGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I think she’s actually ripping this:

“we can’t invoke God’s name in public square”


35 posted on 03/03/2011 11:04:32 AM PST by Reagan69 (I went to a shooting-victims' memorial service and all I got was a lousy T-shirt !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Balls of brass... they fill a number nine wash tub plum up to the brim.

LLS


40 posted on 03/03/2011 11:23:16 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

What a bunch of idiots some freepers are- she SAID NOTHING REGARDING HER NOT BACKING FREE SPEECH!!!!!! some of the freepers need to get a clue. Now that is said, Sarah needs to clarify her tweet so the Paulbots and Romneybots and other fools here can be shutup


66 posted on 03/03/2011 6:56:41 PM PST by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (High time to bring back the sons (and daughters) of liberty!!!! SP4P2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

What lacks common sense is the incorporation doctrine, not only was the whole propose of the “bill of rights” to limit the Federal government not the States.

The 1st amendment specifically spells out congress not just any legislator!

As if that wasn’t bad enough the same Federal employees in black-robes that overthrown the limits of the Federal Constitution, broke their own rules in inventing this doctrine. They had previously rejected this crazy unsupportable idea not once but twice.

It is perfectly reasonable for the Federal government to be prohibited by the 1st amendment in the broadest possible terms. The Federal Governments job is basically just foreign objects. They don’t deal with domestic issues and they were never suppose to.

It is NOT necessarily reasonable to apply them same broad restrictions to the States.

This incident is just the latest example of why.


79 posted on 03/04/2011 3:04:50 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson