Posted on 12/05/2010 8:34:12 AM PST by FS11
September 2008: Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s Yahoo email account is compromised by a member of Anonymous, an online group of hackers, in the final months of the presidential campaign. Personal emails are posted to WikiLeaks, and questions are raised about whether Palin used the personal account to flout public records laws.
April 2010: A video of a U.S. Apache helicopter killing Iraqi civilians and two Reuters journalists is posted to WikiLeaks. While the U.S. had never denied that the civilians and journalists were killed, the graphic footage of the horrors of war quickly goes viral online.
July 2010: WikiLeaks publishes 92,000 pages of U.S. military memos termed the Afghan War Diaries. Among the dump’s contents are reports confirming that members of Pakistan’s intelligence agency routinely met with Taliban fighters between 2004 and 2009, as well as field notes on mounting civilian casualties throughout Afghanistan.
October 2010: Some 400,000 pages on the Iraq War that the Pentagon called “the largest leak of classified documents in its history” are posted by WikiLeaks. The group’s de facto spokesman, Julian Assange, says the documents show 15,000 civilian deaths previously unreported, as well as numerous instances of abuse of civilians at the hands of Iraqi security forces.
Nov. 28, 2010: Through several mainstream media partners, WikiLeaks releases confidential U.S. diplomatic cables, frank assessment of various American allies, with some incriminating information about U.S. foreign activities. WikiLeaks says the information, to be followed by further releases later in the week, will contain “seven times” as many documents as October release.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalpost.com ...
The Russians don’t like drips....they’ll be sending a ‘plumber’ to permanently fix the problem.
I’m figurin’ that our enemies (not Obama...the OTHER enemies) would love to see him dead: FREE INFO!
Thank you for posting this. I am starting a separate file on ‘Wiki-gate’ for convenience.
Do you have any other material about this story that might be relevant to the file?
Here is the file as it stands now.
http://www.nachumlist.com/Wiki-gate.htm
Thanks,
Nachum
I am going to cry foul. Your links show no evidence of that fact.
Nor do they portray the information you claim they portray on other things. If Assange, as an Ausralian, or as an American for that matter, were he one, is perfectly within his rights to object to US intelligence collection efforts targeted at international telecommunications.
You are free to object to what Assange has done - what he has really done - but when you just make stuff up, you come across as the nutjob conspiracy kook.
The most savory of all leaked documentation, the documents that would immortalize Wikileaks into history namely the ones about Obamas lack of qualifications to be POTUS his birth certificate and all other records are not being used by Wikileaks.
Why would they ignore the Holy Grail of a leak?
What is NOT being said in itself says everything.
You are free to object to what Assange has done - what he has really done - but when you just make stuff up, you come across as the nutjob conspiracy kook.
I am not so sure anymore. I was not going to keep a record of this story, but there are some very interesting connections. If you look at his background and who is taking a beating here, funny how none of it seems to harm Obama.
People have been ripped off badly by this administration and there is no trust of it at all. I say good for that. Why not ask hard questions? Could this have a connection to Obama and the world wide communist/socialist and anarchist movements? You betcha.
http://www.nachumlist.com/Wiki-gate.htm
bookmark
Not sure about any direct connections, but the goals seem to be the same.
There is no making stuff up, the two articles don’t mention the two together directly but if you read the circumstances behind the election, you will see that the first article references secret documents being released that swung the election. The second article specifically ties documents released that swung the election to Assange and WikiLeaks.
I was of the impression that the school in Indonesia attended by Obama/Soetoro/Davis was a Catholic school that accepted muslims and accomodated muslim customs. It was NOT a madrassa.
Other than that, your posting and links is/are awesome. It's a pity that so few (relatively) will see the truth you present.
Maybee we need a front page?
LOL.
#7
What language is it in?
Transylvanian?
Bookmarked
Demand that your congressman, County DA, Sheriff, State Legislators, Governor, Attorney General etc. take legal action to remove BO before he completely destroys our Country.
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html
There’s more to that also, that I just thought of. Wikileaks, through somebody with the name “jeena paradies” (who is friendly with the Soros types, according to what I was able to find on him), published Obama’s so-called “Advertiser” birth announcement, claiming that it was the first time they had been published even though images had been online for some time. But it was the first time that the document was in searchable pdf format rather than as a graphic image.
Those announcements were forged. The microfilms were documentably changed out at least once in 3 libraries and at least twice in another.
The Advertiser was working to convert their archives into searchable pdf files.
Wikileaks has since removed their announcement image from the web - before any of these large leaks so it wasn’t because they didn’t have space to keep it on.
The evidence we have at this point strongly suggests that somebody at The Advertiser perpetrated both the Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin forgeries. The Advertiser had the archived microfilms of both papers at their office and would have been able to make the pristine copies from the silver nitrate first-generation master microfilm.
They also had microfiche - which together with the microfilm was available for the public to use. I can’t find out when that was no longer the case but the first time there’s any written account of it was when “infidel granny” on the Atlas Shrugs blog said she asked to see the microfilms and was told they are not public. The microfiche sheets would have had some wear and tear, with which to make the copies that now show up in the Hawaii State Library that are very heavily scratched with DIAGONAL scratches in bizarre places like the shipping charts, which would not have gotten that way from microfilm readers. The Hawaii State Librarian says their microfilm was NOT made from microfiche sheets, but the diagonal scratches on microfilm would only come from somebody trying to take a diagonal copy of the page. Why would tons of people be trying to take a diagonal copy of the shipping charts - the most heavily used page on the whole microfilm, if the scratches are genuine?
It would not surprise me one bit if Obama had The Advertiser and Wikileaks work together to try to give legitimacy to what somebody at The Advertiser had forged for Obama.
So there IS something that Wikileaks “leaked” in regards to Obama’s eligibility: the forged Advertiser announcement, in a format intended to provide legitimacy, as if it came from the Advertiser’s digitized archives.
Glenn Beck talked about the Wikileaks connection to a number of Soros groups. Considering that nothing was leaked that is damaging to Obama but only furthering his ends - including an attempt to legitimize a forgery regarding Obama’s eligibility - I would say it looks pretty likely that Obama IS behind the Wikileaks.
Either that or Wikileaks has voluntarily supported only very critically-timed BHO causes such as damaging Palin, damaging Odinga’s rival, supporting Obama’s fake eligibility story, damaging the war efforts, and damaging Hillary when questions were being asked whether she would run against Obama in 2012.
Ping to another piece in the puzzle that might be considered.
Another thing that should be considered is the fact that Obama chose to lend credibility to his forged COLB (as indirectly confirmed by the HDOH in 2 different ways) by having it released by a so-called “independent” quasi-news agency which utterly lied for his benefit.
Seems like his modus operandi.
The best he can do with even the MSM is to threaten them into not reporting. But these quasi entities he can get to actually make up the doo-doo that he wants to pass off as legitimate, without risking perjury charges himself (on that particular instance).
He still should be facing perjury charges for his statement to AZ that he is eligible to be POTUS, and he should face charges of violating the Federal General False Statement Act for not correcting what he knew to be inaccurate statements about the genuineness of the Factcheck COLB, and he should face charges of misprision of felony for not reporting the people who forged that COLB for him.
Please remove me from your Ping list. Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.