Skip to comments.
Bush camp attacks 'ridiculous' story
Politico ^
| 2010-11-10
| Andy Barr
Posted on 11/10/2010 6:53:52 AM PST by rabscuttle385
Former President George W. Bush is denying a report that he once said he would have endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 if the Democrat had asked.
This is ridiculous and untrue, Bush spokesman David Sherzer told POLITICO. President Bush proudly supported John McCain in the election and voted for him.
A blog post on the website of the Financial Times claimed Tuesday that Bush made the remarks during an Oval Office meeting with British dignitaries, including former Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
I probably wont even vote for the guy, the FT reports Bush having said of McCain.
I had to endorse him, Bush is reported to have said. But Id have endorsed Obama if theyd asked me.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; financialtimes; mccain; obama; obamunism; pravdamedia; revisionisthistory; rinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: rabscuttle385
This is getting hard to follow: do I blame Bush for supporting McCain, or do I blame him for not supporting McCain?
Can some True Conservatives chime in, here?
2
posted on
11/10/2010 6:58:34 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: rabscuttle385
What times! Leftists now need Bush's gravitas to save Obama...
3
posted on
11/10/2010 7:00:38 AM PST
by
alecqss
To: rabscuttle385
Bush seems to be a guy who doesn't run his mouth off gratuitously.
I would believe whatever he says directly before I would believe third-party accounts.
4
posted on
11/10/2010 7:00:38 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Government has no other end, but the preservation of property." --John Locke)
To: 1rudeboy
...it’s the old “when do you stop beating your wife” scam
JUST POLITICO BS
5
posted on
11/10/2010 7:01:26 AM PST
by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: rabscuttle385
The link to the F.T. article in the Politico no workie?
I'd like to see who wrote it, Politico didn't think it was important enough for their little hit piece.
To: rabscuttle385
LOL! Bush haters are ridiculously stupid.
More proof here.
7
posted on
11/10/2010 7:03:59 AM PST
by
ohioWfan
(Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
To: rabscuttle385
A rumor that Obama and his band of criminal communist put out there..They see how popular Bush still is so they want to ride the gravy train..
I saw most of the interviews and he said nothing of the sort..he did say how ever he would not talk bad about the sitting president..To me that was enough..He shows the class his family has..While Obama downs and blames Bush for everything Obama does wrong, Bush sits back and says nothing about the moron in the white house..nothing bad that is..
8
posted on
11/10/2010 7:04:34 AM PST
by
PLD
To: rabscuttle385
A blog post on the website of the Financial Times claimed Tuesday...Ohhhhhhhh.....a blog post.
Well, you certainly can't get any more credible than that.
9
posted on
11/10/2010 7:06:56 AM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: PLD
Bush is smart in keeping quiet.
obama is taking care of his reputation just fine.
To: Doogle
11
posted on
11/10/2010 7:08:27 AM PST
by
FourPeas
(Pester not the geek, for the electrons are his friends.)
To: rabscuttle385; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; ...
If “Bush endorsing Obama” is the kind of bunk Financial Times is willing to run, makes you question their financial advice.
12
posted on
11/10/2010 7:09:05 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
To: Doogle; The Comedian
...its the old (how often do you beat your wife)
scam The multicultural politically correct answer to this question is "not as often as Islam permits".
13
posted on
11/10/2010 7:11:57 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
To: 1rudeboy
I think the way to handle your dilemma is to try “I’m supporting whichever candidate runs with Sarah Palin”.
14
posted on
11/10/2010 7:15:02 AM PST
by
Stosh
To: Texas resident
I totally agree with you..
15
posted on
11/10/2010 7:16:17 AM PST
by
PLD
To: rabscuttle385
More journOlista fantasies
16
posted on
11/10/2010 7:17:35 AM PST
by
Carley
(WE SAW NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
To: Texas Eagle
“Ohhhhhhhh.....a blog post.
Well, you certainly can't get any more credible than that.”
This is getting so stupid. A blog post or a “tweet” now passes as news? Sheesh.
17
posted on
11/10/2010 7:22:32 AM PST
by
Gabrial
(The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
To: a fool in paradise
18
posted on
11/10/2010 7:23:19 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
Yeah, and Hunter Thompson was just a paid blogger at ESPNDisney when he said that the offenses at Abu Ghraib were worse than the most vile Nazi attrocities.
19
posted on
11/10/2010 7:30:41 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
To: ohioWfan; rabscuttle385
LOL! Bush haters are ridiculously stupid.
Careful, you'll get branded as not a "True Conservative" by rabs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson