Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Entitlement Nation--Will Obama soon bankrupt us all?
Frontpagemagazine ^ | 8-18-10 | Tait Trussell

Posted on 08/18/2010 5:53:30 AM PDT by SJackson

Entitlement Nation
Tait Trussell
 
So many Americans now look to their government expectantly for every need and desire that our system of entitlements has largely replaced self-reliance, industriousness, and independence. A huge segment of the population now reflects plodding mediocrity. To paraphrase author C.S. Lewis, we sought “a benevolent leader who likes to see people enjoying themselves, and at the end of each day a good time is had by all.”

Our founding principle of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness has been twisted to become a guarantee of happiness. Entitlement-spending by government is known as “auto-pilot” spending if Congress has little or no power to control it. Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid have long been on auto-pilot with expenditures over which Congress has had little or no will to control. Now nationalized health care is an entitlement. It has even been called a “right.” A Newsweek article last year quoted then-Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass) as saying that “we will break the old gridlock and guarantee that every American …will have decent, quality health care as a fundamental right.”

As the give-away Obama Administration and Congress provide more and more entitlements, we are fast becoming an entitlement nation. In time, this can bankrupt us. Erskine Bowles, co-chairman of President Obama’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, compared the unsustainability of the federal budget to a “cancer.” He said also, “This is a challenge for America.” Democrats will slightly out number Republicans on the commission, appointed in February. It is to recommend putting the budget in balance (achieving deficits of about 3 percent of GDP) by 2015.

The Obama budget for fiscal 2011 calls for $3.8 trillion in spending. About 60 percent of it now is mandatory entitlement spending. Nearly $678 billion was for Social Security, $425 billion for Medicare, and $251 billion for the federal share of Medicaid. Some $607 billion is for other mandatory spending programs. About 5 percent of the federal budget now has to be paid out for interest on the national debt.

On Jan. 16, 2009, Obama was all about entitlement reform pledging to put a hold on entitlements, making them a “central part” of his plan to curtail federal spending. At that time he said, “What we have done is kick this can down the road. We are now at the end of the road and are not in a position to kick it any further…making sure some of the hard decisions are made under my watch….”

How quickly matters change. First, the trillion dollar socialized health care was foisted on the nation. Now, Obama wants to add guaranteed education to the country’s plethora of entitlement programs. In an August 9 speech at the University of Texas in Austin he declared: “The single most important thing we can do is to make sure that we’ve got a world class education system for everybody. This is a pre-requisite for everybody.”  He called for 8 million more college graduates by 2020. He said college must be made more affordable and promised “the best education possible from cradle through a career.”

Enter realism: Only about half of the freshmen entering four-year colleges eventually graduate. Freshman-to-sophomore drop-out rates, according to other studies, increased to 27 percent. The notion that all young people will go to college is an impractical dream. Nearly 6.2 million students in the United States between the ages of 16 and 24 drop out of high school, CNN reported last year. That totals 16 percent of all those of that age in the county. Most were Latino or black, a study found at Northeastern University in Boston. Of the 30 occupations with the highest expected growth from 2008 to 2018, only 8 require a bachelor’s degree.

Acting so as to let no teacher be left behind, Obama Aug. 10 signed a $26 billion bill that Democrats in Congress said would save 300,000 teachers, as well as police and others—mainly union members—from lay-offs this election year, the AP reported. This entitlement, mainly for union members, is to be paid for in two ways. One is by raising $10 billion in taxes on U.S.-based multinational companies. The balance is to come from accelerating the phase out of an increase in food stamp payments. Food stamps were increased in last year’s stimulus package

The new law provides that payments would return to pre-stimulus amounts in 2014, thereby supposedly saving $12 million. Does any one believe the food stamp entitlement of nearly $75 billion for 40 million people won’t be kept available. Someone said that “honesty may not be the best policy in politics, but it’s worth trying once in a while”

Some people stay on the food stamp entitlement program practically all their lives. According to a Yahoo.com blogger, food stamps are “not meant to be someone’s income for their entire life unless they are mentally challenged or injured. They don’t feel bad about spending other people’s money; they just seem to think it is the way it should be. They never feel bad or guilty that they are sucking money out of society. I work at Wal-Mart and see the same people every day buying things on food stamps. One time a man bought $87 on just candy and pop…that tells me this person does not really need to be on food stamps. While checking at Wal-Mart, this girl (commented) ‘food should not be taxed, because it is a need.’ While saying this, she was paying with food stamps.”

For more than 40 years the food stamp program, now called SNAP, for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, has been a mainline entitlement program to aid low-income families. SNAP now puts food on the tables of 28 million people every month, according to About.com—U.S. Government Information. In general, people who work for low wages, are unemployed, work part time, get public assistance, are elderly or disabled and have a small income may be eligible.

The Democrat-controlled Senate barely missed giving retirees, disabled and veterans a $250 hand-out to make up for the loss of the cost-of-living increase (COLA) they normally get. Logic, of course, would dictate that because there’s no inflation, why is a COLA justified, especially at a cost of $13 billion? This COLA has been an annual entitlement since 1975.

TEFAP is the acronym for The Emergency Food Assistance Program, a federally funded, state assisted entitlement for low-income families providing them with emergency food at no cost. Not to be confused with TANF, which stands for Temporary Assistance For Needy Families. Its beneficiaries are families with dependent children and women in their last three months of pregnancy. It also helps recipients find jobs—if they want to work. Then there’s SSI, or supplemental security income. It’s a needs-based program for those who have never worked, or those whose earnings in recent years have been low enough to result in a small Social Security benefit, or no benefit at all. Subsidized housing or “social housing” is government-supported accommodation for people with low to moderate incomes. Forms of subsidies for housing include direct housing subsidies, non-profit housing, public housing, rent supplements and some forms of co-operative and private sector housing. Cost runs in the hundreds of billions.

George Bush helped create the prescription drug program for seniors, which made Medicare more expensive. Obama finally got his national health entitlement. ObamaCare was written to make it appear to improve Medicare’s financial picture. But one had to assume that the tough changes the law said would occur actually would take place.

Those assumptions, however, are implausible, according to Richard S. Foster the straight-talking Chief Actuary of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The actuary said the unfunded obligation for Medicare Part A (doctor visits) for was $13.4 trillion, not $2.4 trillion ObamaCare listed as unfunded liability in 2010.

All this does not mean there should be no help for the truly needy. But finally, there’s now the entitlement of wireless welfare. Namely, free cell phones and 250 calling minutes paid for all individuals eligible for food stamps, Medicaid, and other programs if they have an income at or below 133 percent of the poverty level of $14,404. The federal cell phone tab is over $1 billion.

In an Entitlement Society, a nation can stagnate. It’s a society fit for drones, rewarding sloth and blind obedience. It penalizes innovators, risk-takers, and achievers. Is that what we want for America?



TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 08/18/2010 5:53:32 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Entitlements are just one process in the Cloward-Piven Strategy.


2 posted on 08/18/2010 5:56:04 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

That’s BO’s/BS’s and his fellow marxists goal. It’s called the Cloward-Piven strategy.


3 posted on 08/18/2010 5:56:13 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: wampanoag

“Jobs such as cleaning parks and schools, doing paper work, tutoring kids etc”.

...maybe not “tutoring kids”. Labor intensive jobs so there’s an incentive to leave the gov mandated job.


5 posted on 08/18/2010 6:00:42 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The root cause of all this? The Federal Reserve.

Note, The Fed was one of the Progressives first pillars put in place, back in 1913.

If there is no Fed, there are no bubbles, and there are no bailouts. No Fed means that if the Gov’t wants to overspend by $1.2 Trillion per year, the Gov’t must immediately raise taxes or actually sell that debt to the public - with immediate consequences. Schemes like Obamacare piled on Medicaire, piled on Social Security would be impossible.

Kill the Fed, and you immediately kill the entitlement society.


6 posted on 08/18/2010 6:03:01 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

BHOTrill


7 posted on 08/18/2010 6:04:37 AM PDT by FrankR (It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wampanoag
They should be put to work in government mandated jobs to collect their checks.

Obama would love you. You could probably get a job in his "how to convert private-sector jobs to public-sector" wing.

Some of us would rather unemployed private-sector people spend their time getting another private-sector job.

8 posted on 08/18/2010 6:07:49 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The exponential numbers are coming! The exponential numbers are coming!
9 posted on 08/18/2010 6:08:19 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Entitlement Nation--Will Obama soon bankrupt us all?

He already has.

10 posted on 08/18/2010 6:08:48 AM PDT by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Ecclesiastes 10:2 (NIV)

“The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
But the heart of the fool to the left.”


11 posted on 08/18/2010 6:10:32 AM PDT by PLD (When you receive a kindness,remember it;when you bestow one,forget it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: SJackson
"Entitlement Nation--Will Obama soon bankrupt us all? "

Yes. He and congress have us well on our way to insolvency.

13 posted on 08/18/2010 6:11:07 AM PDT by ronnyquest (There's a communist living in the White House! Now, what are you going to do about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

We *are* bankrupt. There’s nothing “soon” about it. We just haven’t filed yet.


14 posted on 08/18/2010 6:18:56 AM PDT by Yet_Again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Great article. Vote the collectivists/progressives/totalitarians OUT...FOREVER. Dismantle their collectives.


15 posted on 08/18/2010 6:22:10 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

This country will remain bankrupt as long as leftists remain numerous.


16 posted on 08/18/2010 6:27:27 AM PDT by Soothesayer (“None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring; wampanoag
I just posted about this issue yesterday on on this thread:
Believe me, I am really hacked off right now about these parasites. My soon-to-be-ex-husband's girlfriend is living in HUD housing on disability and apparently she has been the one trying to convince him to go on disability for the last few years after he had bypass surgery. He kept bringing that idea up with me and I told him no, that he could even get a job in the Electrical Department at Home Depot if he felt he couldn't handle the physical labor on a jobsite (he can, but won't).

I just found out he is defrauding the unemployment office too, he had a job for two weeks and is not going to tell them about it. He was cut off at the beginning of June after being unemployed since last October.

He "miraculously" found a job that same week and then when more benefits became available Aug 1st, he left that job and applied for benefits again. He thinks the Judge in divorce court is going to feel sorry for him because he is on unemployment and he won't have to pay anything.

Meanwhile, I am stuck with all of his bills and am trying to finance the mortgage in my own name. I just had my hip replaced in June, when he left me and moved in with her the day after I got home. However, I had disability insurance through my job, which I have held for 24 years. He says that I should not drag her butt into court on adultery charges because "she is disabled and living in HUD housing"...freaking boo-hoo, too bad.

I don't qualify for any assistance nor would I take any, I am even going to have to dip into my 401(k) for the down payment on the house. Arrrrrrggggghhhh! I despise these parasites!

Disclaimer: Not all Section 8/HUD users are parasites, but there sure are more of them than the honest folks!

That being said, I really do have to agree with Gondring, his girlfriend easily convinced him he didn't have to work for a living and could live off of the Government teat. Those of us who have careers and are paying the tab are getting really frustrated, but indentured slavery is not the answer.
17 posted on 08/18/2010 6:28:54 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

18 posted on 08/18/2010 6:30:15 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

What’s this “soon” crap? The US is already bankrupt.


19 posted on 08/18/2010 6:36:23 AM PDT by Brouhaha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wampanoag
I demand that you work part time for the people who are paying you (the taxpayers) for that check after 22 weeks.

Considering unemployment doesn't go to those who haven't worked (and therefore likely paid into the system--in some cases, such as Pennsylvania, on a separate line of the paycheck as "unemployment insurance"), your proposal is another case of viewing the money as being the government's and not the people's. I suppose your next proposal, similar in its substance, would be to make those d@#* retirees get off their butts and work if they want a Social Security check!?

Government needs to get smaller, not bigger...getting out of people's way, not setting up mandatory State-Service programs. I don't want to join Obama-Corps (pronounced Corpse, of course :-) to collect insurance into which I have paid.

Your proposal gives cover to those who won't take responsibility for smothering job creation in the economy.

BTW, I have to run, as I am trying hard to keep off unemployment. :-)

20 posted on 08/18/2010 6:38:51 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson