Posted on 08/05/2010 11:16:11 AM PDT by bronkburnett
The statistics about how more than 70% of single white women joined with 96% of Blacks, 80% of Jews, and almost all gays to elect Braack Hussein Obama are indisputable. While white married women and white men voted overwhelmingly for McCain, single white women, especially under 40 years old, voted more than 70% for Obama. And many of them convinced their parents to vote for Obama.
And why were single white women so different than white married women or than white men?
Well, family values are being destroyed by liberals. With it, they are destroying the security that comes with marriage. Deliberately. As they push more dependence on Government … and decrease the “independence” of each American that is discussed in our Declaration of Independence. So Democrats are presenting the government as the care taker of single women and their families as the replacement for husbands.
In the last election, Obama promised healthcare for everyone, redistribution of wealth, closing a perceived pay gap between women and men (which is actually nonexistent when pays are compared for the same jobs at the same experience and performance), and more welfare benefits for single parents.
So of course single women voted for Obama. They were bought. They want help at caring for themselves and their children. And so they embrace the socialism presented by Obama.
Add the fact that teachers in the USA are 80% women
(Excerpt) Read more at atlah.org ...
Well, making men useless worked for the black community... right? /s
See. It’s not about females voting. It’s only about “single” females. Married women know better. *ducks*
Arrgggghh."
Dementia AND failing eyesight. How sad. ; )
That’s great! We need more women to get behind that movement!
Because they're living in a world the way they'd like it to be as opposed to the rest of us who live in the world that actually exists.
Well, count “me” out of those 70%.
I’m a single, white woman and I’m sure not looking for Mr. Moneybag!
I would have NO problem giving up my vote if it meant the feminazis didn’t get one. I know I would be represented through my husband.
The woman’s movement is best viewed from behind.
Lol and I didn’t even have to click the link!
incredible. simply incredible.
these are products of our education system.
Re: “They fell for the long-legged Mack Daddy.”
Wallace-Wells mentions in Rolling Stone:
There is an amazingly candid moment in Obama’s autobiography when he writes of his childhood discomfort at the way his mother would sexualize African-American men. “More than once,” he recalls, “my mother would point out Harry Belafonte is the best-looking man on the planet.” What the focus groups his advisers conducted revealed was that Obama’s political career now depends, in some measure, upon a tamer version of this same feeling, on the complicated dynamics of how white women respond to a charismatic black man.
Early in his run for the U.S. Senate in 2004, Obama’s pollsters discovered that women loved him, especially nice white ladies who like personalities more than politics and definitely don’t like political arguments.
Women gave up a LOT when they decided to reject the biblical model of male headship.
This article points out that this is the way women are made by their Creator - to expect to be provided for and protected, first by their father and then by their husband.
The man was intended to be the representative of the family to the outside world. Of course, that only lasted a couple of chapters before becoming corrupted.
The actual gender gap for the 1960 election was only 2%. Many women voted for Nixon-heck, more women than men, percentagewise voted for Ike in 1952 and 1956.
Kind of different than what the media tells us-just like Nixon won most of the under 30 vote in 1968 and 1972
Aren't you the author?
Ann Coulter has said that she’d give up her vote if all other women had to give up theirs and then nothing but conservatives would win from now on. I’m inclined to agree.
“So Democrats are presenting the government as the care taker of single women and their families as the replacement for husbands.”
I’ll take the symbolism a step further - the “hubby” is certainly “consumating” those in such an unholy union. Come to think of it, we’re all getting screwed.
Or only allow married people to vote. (Ducking right behind you)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.