You are still using insults..a new one....do you speak to people with whom you disagree at your dinner table? Or in person? I have a friend who disagrees with me on several points politically. She and I have been friends for over 50 years. We first met in our small hometown in vacation bible school. Never in a million years would I insult her..or her me...we can disagree...but we love each other dearly and have a tremendous respect for each other. Also, I am married...over 44 years to a blue dog democrat. Never have I insulted him. Nor he I. Why you think I am going to discuss anything with you after two insults, I have no idea.
Do you often get a case of the vapors when, after you say “I don't understand” and someone points out that ‘if you don't understand you haven't been paying attention’, and when reply that you HAVE been paying attention wonder what mental deficiencies might have caused your inability to see what should be obvious?
Why people are mad at Stupak should be obvious.
I wonder why you are unable to either see why people would be mad, and unable to explain why what Stupak did was just A-OK.
Your case of the vapors seems a convenient excuse to not answer the question as to why Stupak is supposedly unassailable on this issue and that people have no legitimate reason to be upset with him.
Just because your enemy is friendly towards you doesn't mean he is not an enemy. Those who smile at you while working against your very core belief are your enemy, whether you recognize it or not.
Example; Orin Hatch stated his best friend was Ted Kennedy. One was a traitor, the other was a fool, you decide which.