Replies

OK. So you don't see why people would be upset at Stupak, you are insulted that I think only a mental defective could have both been paying attention and also not understand why people would be upset, and you think my characterization of your refusal to answer as the “cowardly option” was a further insult.

Do you often get a case of the vapors when, after you say “I don't understand” and someone points out that ‘if you don't understand you haven't been paying attention’, and when reply that you HAVE been paying attention wonder what mental deficiencies might have caused your inability to see what should be obvious?

Why people are mad at Stupak should be obvious.

I wonder why you are unable to either see why people would be mad, and unable to explain why what Stupak did was just A-OK.

Your case of the vapors seems a convenient excuse to not answer the question as to why Stupak is supposedly unassailable on this issue and that people have no legitimate reason to be upset with him.