Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats worried about Republicans' motion to recommit on Stupak language
The Hill ^ | 3/21/10

Posted on 03/21/2010 4:19:15 PM PDT by JimWayne

Democrats are worried about holding their members together on a GOP motion that could kill the healthcare bill.

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) said House leaders are specifically concerned about a Republican motion to recommit that would contain only language on abortion that Stupak originally had wanted to include in the Senate bill.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; democrats; gophealthcare; healthcare; michigan; obamacare; recommit; stupak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: JimWayne

Well *gosh* that changes everything...


21 posted on 03/21/2010 4:27:00 PM PDT by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LS

It won’t derail anything, it just splits the Dems on record.


22 posted on 03/21/2010 4:27:09 PM PDT by HarryCaul (Verify Possums!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Smoke and mirrors. The dems are toast. Either way they vote, they’ve tormented us and they’ll pay.


23 posted on 03/21/2010 4:27:27 PM PDT by Indy Pendance (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Make them lay their heads on the chopping block.


24 posted on 03/21/2010 4:27:33 PM PDT by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts soooo good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Agree, quite a bright light has been shined on the cockroaches hiding in the dark. I have never been so disgusted at American politicians in my life.


25 posted on 03/21/2010 4:28:04 PM PDT by HerrBlucher ("When the national government and Congress start going wild, it's up the states to rein them in.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GoCards
Oh goodness gracious. Now they worried about the law, bs.

Another "rope a dope" ploy on the part of the dems..they aren't worried about anything.

I've posted several times that I believe the dems are confident that they are assured that they have finally managed to set themselves up for permanent control of the US government.

IF there is an election in November, they believe it will be stolen in their favor, and I look for a move to do away with the presidential term limits in order to guarantee Obama Dictator for Live..unless he decides to declare himself King of the World instead.

Fool me once, shame on you...fool me twice, shame on me!

26 posted on 03/21/2010 4:28:24 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (I used to eat a lot of natural foods until I learned that most people die of natural causes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rintense

You are absolutely right. That is why a Motion to Recommit is important. IF successful, it becomes a bill with a different text and the Senate will have to vote on it again. If it does not succeed, it at least records the votes of the House members who opposed the amendment in the Motion to Recommit.


27 posted on 03/21/2010 4:28:27 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Would this then prevent Hussein from having the agreement as an EO and being able to rescind it? Or is it just a matter of slowing down the procedure?


28 posted on 03/21/2010 4:29:42 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Splitting hairs is what this guy does for a living.


29 posted on 03/21/2010 4:31:31 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GoCards

Traitors are always worried about the law.


30 posted on 03/21/2010 4:31:36 PM PDT by alecqss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

>> it at least records the votes of the House members who opposed the amendment

Specifically, the Stupak gang.


31 posted on 03/21/2010 4:32:04 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

I don’t understand this much but I heard yesterday dKOS was very worried about this ‘motion to recommit’ and Hillbuzz was saying that it could be a very powerful weapon against the Dems.


32 posted on 03/21/2010 4:33:03 PM PDT by plushaye (May God help us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

For Pete’s sake, it will not be acted on, all this amounts to is Stupak playing idiots who are dumb enough to drink the koolaid that he is dispensing.

Don’t be a Stupak idiot.


33 posted on 03/21/2010 4:33:56 PM PDT by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne; Miss Didi
Ping for JimWayne's explanation!

The Minority Party will have one last chance to make amendments to the bill and can introduce it just before the vote. There will be a 10 minute debate on this and then the House votes to either send it back to the Committee or not. These votes are RECORDED.

Since they are recorded, most Dims who do not want to be associated with killing babies will vote for the amendment (so goes the thinking) and when it gets sent back to the Committee and they add the amended language and return the bill (all within minutes), the bill is now a totally different one from the Senate bill meaning that the Senate will have to vote on it again.

The suggestion here is that the Republicans should offer the Stupak language as the Motion to Recommit and either change the bill or force a recorded vote of their opposition to the amendment.

34 posted on 03/21/2010 4:34:00 PM PDT by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

If the Senate has to vote again will this vote be simple majority or 60+?


35 posted on 03/21/2010 4:34:49 PM PDT by Kahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
I like the spunk, but the 'rats aren't actually worried about anything; if they were, then they would have voted the whole SOB down.

They aren't and they won't.

Mr. niteowl77

36 posted on 03/21/2010 4:36:20 PM PDT by niteowl77 (You wanted him, and now you have got him. I say, "Good day to you," America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MOgirl

Storm DC and remove these traitors from their mini kingdom.


37 posted on 03/21/2010 4:36:42 PM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: plushaye

It seems to me like they vote for the amendment to not fund abortions. But in turn that means it goes back to the Senate where it is dead. OR... they vote against it (which is ONLY abortion language), which means that HC passes, but they have now labeled themselves as pro-abortion.

It is a no win situation for the Stupack guys.
Yes = against abortion, against HC
No = for abortion, for HC

did I get that right?


38 posted on 03/21/2010 4:37:46 PM PDT by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kahuna

60, it will be an amended bill, not recon, and the senate would have to start all over again.


39 posted on 03/21/2010 4:37:50 PM PDT by HerrBlucher ("When the national government and Congress start going wild, it's up the states to rein them in.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Oh, not to worry. Biden will take care of that.


40 posted on 03/21/2010 4:38:24 PM PDT by Carley (Are you better off now than one year ago? HELL NO!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson