PATENT BULL$HIT
Why> The American public possesses more Common Sense than the climate data and carbon manipulators. That’s why.
Why? Because politicians and scientists have been lying to us to achieve political goals. That’s why!!
Why are climate scientists considered scientists?
“Climate scientists” are not losing the American public. It’s just that we have stopped listening to the charlatans and poseurs like Jim Hansen and started listening to real climate scientists - who actually know something about the subject - like Richard Lindzen and many others.
The “press” is nothing but a whore’s union, and the Washington Post is prime among them.
It’s called “political science.” It’s taken over just about all the mainstream science periodicals, and is unavoidable in every other form of media. People get suspicious of constantly accomodating the latest, leftist political hobby horse du jour.
It’s been going on now for at least three decades. It’s getting reminiscent of the old Lysenkoism under the Soviet Union, quite frankly. Erstwhile scientists have allowed themselves to become a mere propaganda arm, due to whoring after government grant money.
Duhhhhhhh—just who do you think is BEHIND THE SNOW SHOVEL?
Climate scientists are merely politicians seeking federal and foundation grants for their “studies.”
Follow the money Bud!! this has always been about scaming the tax payers in a powergrab which has been a proven hoax!!
They want to rip down hydro-electric dams, they don't want to build nuclear plants, they live in big homes and drive big cars.
It was obvious it was a scam all along.
If not for alternative media sources to the DBM, people would still be on board with the global warming hype because they would never have been exposed to all the facts.
Looking at the graph from 2008 on, saying that a majority of Americans "still" think global warming is real is like saying a guy who fell off his roof is "still" not injured.
Because we’re COLD, you idiot!
“A majority of Americans ... say the effects of the problem
have already begun or will do so in a few years.”
-
And just what do these people base their answer on?
Personally observed effects?
Personal analysis of the data?
Or the brainwashing from the media and politicians?
My honest answer to the question is “I have no idea,
and I don’t think anyone else does either.”
I have no predisposed faith in any of the agenda-driven
quasi-scientific reports that I have read;
and I have personally seen nothing to indicate this
one way or the other.
Survey:
Do you think it will be a good year for growing tomatoes?
Now, how do I answer that question?
Well, last year was good, but the year before was not.
How do I “know” what it will be like this year?
Or next year, or the next one after that?
By facts?
By speculation?
Or because I heard someone on TV from the national tomato institute
say something about it one way or the other?
I’ve started my seedlings in the basement, we’ll see...
Add to that the fact the weather is something average people can observe. People know whether it's been getting warmer or colder. The warmist's weather models failed to predict the leveling off of temperature gains for the past fifteen years. People pay attention.
Depressing news indeed. All those years of lying to the public in order to advance their political agenda. This little pinhead journalist believes that the dust up over the IPCC is just a matter of a few "minor errors". He is clearly one of those who has fallen for the environmental propaganda and is more than happy to continue carrying water for them. These are not minor errors, they are evidence of widespread and very deliberate fraud. The American public understand this, intellectual twits like Stephen Stromberg have yet to catch on.