Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Somehow Stephen Stromberg can't wrap his head around the fact that the science has been manipulated to the extent that the issue of world temperature trends are now indeterminate.
1 posted on 03/14/2010 6:09:25 AM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: ricks_place
Gallup poll: A majority of Americans still agree that global warming is real, as 53%

PATENT BULL$HIT

2 posted on 03/14/2010 6:12:34 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

Why> The American public possesses more Common Sense than the climate data and carbon manipulators. That’s why.


3 posted on 03/14/2010 6:13:24 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

Why? Because politicians and scientists have been lying to us to achieve political goals. That’s why!!


4 posted on 03/14/2010 6:14:14 AM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
Yeh what you said plus the fact that the regulations only take place in some countries and not others. If it was a problem it would need to be addressed by every one and not just by a few.
5 posted on 03/14/2010 6:14:27 AM PDT by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

Why are climate scientists considered scientists?


6 posted on 03/14/2010 6:16:29 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

“Climate scientists” are not losing the American public. It’s just that we have stopped listening to the charlatans and poseurs like Jim Hansen and started listening to real climate scientists - who actually know something about the subject - like Richard Lindzen and many others.

The “press” is nothing but a whore’s union, and the Washington Post is prime among them.


7 posted on 03/14/2010 6:18:18 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

It’s called “political science.” It’s taken over just about all the mainstream science periodicals, and is unavoidable in every other form of media. People get suspicious of constantly accomodating the latest, leftist political hobby horse du jour.

It’s been going on now for at least three decades. It’s getting reminiscent of the old Lysenkoism under the Soviet Union, quite frankly. Erstwhile scientists have allowed themselves to become a mere propaganda arm, due to whoring after government grant money.


8 posted on 03/14/2010 6:20:45 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

Duhhhhhhh—just who do you think is BEHIND THE SNOW SHOVEL?


9 posted on 03/14/2010 6:20:52 AM PDT by Flintlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
AGW is being discredited because it has been exposed as mostly hype and doom and gloom. The author might try to acquaint himself with what may be a new concept for him. Telling The Truth.
11 posted on 03/14/2010 6:22:36 AM PDT by JPG (Mr. Gore, we have a warrant for your arrest...put your hands behind your back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

Climate scientists are merely politicians seeking federal and foundation grants for their “studies.”


12 posted on 03/14/2010 6:23:28 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

Follow the money Bud!! this has always been about scaming the tax payers in a powergrab which has been a proven hoax!!


14 posted on 03/14/2010 6:28:05 AM PDT by timetostand (Ya say ya wanna revolution -- OK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
OK, while it has become pretty clear to anyone not a complete fool that GW is a scam -- when one has to make up data to back up a claim one, by definition, does not have data to back up the claim -- even before the East Anglia revelations all one had to do was look at the behavior of the crowd demanding action.

They want to rip down hydro-electric dams, they don't want to build nuclear plants, they live in big homes and drive big cars.

It was obvious it was a scam all along.

15 posted on 03/14/2010 6:29:43 AM PDT by Tribune7 (Only stupid, racists people support Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

If not for alternative media sources to the DBM, people would still be on board with the global warming hype because they would never have been exposed to all the facts.


17 posted on 03/14/2010 6:30:55 AM PDT by randita (Sarah Palin has the same computer that I have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
SIMPLE, We are Americans have enough BS of our own to concern ourselves with fairytale scientists and climate change
18 posted on 03/14/2010 6:35:59 AM PDT by BornToBeAmerican (“If you think education is expensive try ignorance.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
From the link in the article to the Gallup poll in question:

Looking at the graph from 2008 on, saying that a majority of Americans "still" think global warming is real is like saying a guy who fell off his roof is "still" not injured.

19 posted on 03/14/2010 6:37:16 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place; Tunehead54; Clive; Fractal Trader; tubebender; marvlus; Genesis defender; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

20 posted on 03/14/2010 6:40:04 AM PDT by steelyourfaith (Warmists as "traffic light" apocalyptics: "Greens too yellow to admit they're really Reds."-Monckton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

Because we’re COLD, you idiot!


22 posted on 03/14/2010 6:43:14 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Aw, CUSSWORDS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

“A majority of Americans ... say the effects of the problem
have already begun or will do so in a few years.”
-
And just what do these people base their answer on?
Personally observed effects?
Personal analysis of the data?
Or the brainwashing from the media and politicians?

My honest answer to the question is “I have no idea,
and I don’t think anyone else does either.”

I have no predisposed faith in any of the agenda-driven
quasi-scientific reports that I have read;
and I have personally seen nothing to indicate this
one way or the other.

Survey:
Do you think it will be a good year for growing tomatoes?
Now, how do I answer that question?
Well, last year was good, but the year before was not.
How do I “know” what it will be like this year?
Or next year, or the next one after that?
By facts?
By speculation?
Or because I heard someone on TV from the national tomato institute
say something about it one way or the other?

I’ve started my seedlings in the basement, we’ll see...


23 posted on 03/14/2010 6:43:56 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Thank you for your contribution. Your comment has been submitted for review.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
"manipulated"

Add to that the fact the weather is something average people can observe. People know whether it's been getting warmer or colder. The warmist's weather models failed to predict the leveling off of temperature gains for the past fifteen years. People pay attention.

25 posted on 03/14/2010 6:51:51 AM PDT by driftless2 (for long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
Depressing news for environmentalists, who have spent years building the public case for concern

Depressing news indeed. All those years of lying to the public in order to advance their political agenda. This little pinhead journalist believes that the dust up over the IPCC is just a matter of a few "minor errors". He is clearly one of those who has fallen for the environmental propaganda and is more than happy to continue carrying water for them. These are not minor errors, they are evidence of widespread and very deliberate fraud. The American public understand this, intellectual twits like Stephen Stromberg have yet to catch on.

26 posted on 03/14/2010 6:52:39 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson