[P-Marlowe]

I only hold that science is a creation of God

Wrongo, my FRiend. Science is not a "creation of God."

Science is the study of the creation of God.

The scientific method is the creation of man.

When that method denies or outright refuses to recognize or even consider the creator's hand in creation, it ceases to be Science.

[GodGunsGuts]

==The scientific method is the creation of man.

I thought the following excerpt from Agamemnon to a poster on another thread might help shed light on this timely and important subject :o)

------------------------

But speaking of his unction for presumption maybe if he'd like to comment on the presumed wonders of what passes for accuracy and credibility in today's "peer reviewed" literature, he'd like to start here with this "peer-reviewed journal" entry:

"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" PLoS Med 2(8): e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124, August 5, 2005.

If that version is too difficult for him to digest, or he finds it "too scary," the puréed peas and baby carrots version may be found here:

"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" New Scientist 30 August 2005, Kurt Kleiner

Whack-a-way!

[Hound of the Baskervilles]

Okay then one of God’s creations includes the small pox virus. A scourge causing a horrific painful death. Thanks to man (ie evil scientists) small pox can be cured. So who gets the glory? God who created small pox or the scientists who found a cure?

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!

[tacticalogic]

When that method denies or outright refuses to recognize or even consider the creator's hand in creation, it ceases to be Science.

Can you articulate exactly how it needs to be changed to do that?