Funny you should mention that, Nebraska man will be the subject of my next post. I’ll ping you when it’s up.
All the best—GGG
Let me guess, you'll use it as an example of how evolutionary scientists extract fanciful ideas from almost no evidence.
However, you will of course ignore that it was evolutionists who in doing further work discovered it to be a mistake. Quite the opposite of Nebraska Man showing evolutionary theory a failure, it is a testament to the willingness of evolutionists to further research any claims and to correct themselves in the face of the evidence.
That's just how science works. People make claims, those claims are challenged, and they have to stand or fall based on the evidence. And all that happens without creationist input.