Skip to comments.
Police: Man killed with his own gun during robbery
Orange County Register ^
| 6/29/2009
| JON CASSIDY
Posted on 06/30/2009 12:23:38 AM PDT by South40
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
That's the last home this thug will break into.
1
posted on
06/30/2009 12:23:38 AM PDT
by
South40
To: South40
let that be a lesson to crooks everywhere, if you break into a home with a gun the homeowner may take it from you and shoot you.
2
posted on
06/30/2009 12:33:38 AM PDT
by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: South40
And they lay wait for their
own blood; they lurk privily for their
own lives. - Proverbs 1:18
This is "level 1" morality exhorting "level 0" morality to see the error of its ways. If only it would.
3
posted on
06/30/2009 12:37:06 AM PDT
by
dr_lew
To: South40
Jules: “Now Yolanda, we’re not gonna do anything stupid, are we? . . . Yolanda, I thought you said you were gonna be cool. Now when you yell at me, it makes me nervous. And when I get nervous, I get scared.”
To: South40
Here's a pic of the accomplice:
5
posted on
06/30/2009 12:48:19 AM PDT
by
DemforBush
(Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
To: South40
I thought that it was kinda nice of him to bring a gun so that they could shoot him.
To: South40
Fantastic. Should have shot the accomplice as well. California cops treat burglary like it’s nothing. It’s a violent crime that psychopaths use to finance their degenerate lives, and it often leads to identity theft, rape, armed robbery, and murder. Burglars should be given 20 years first offense, no parole. That would take 90% of the psychopaths off the streets for two decades.
7
posted on
06/30/2009 1:09:51 AM PDT
by
gorilla_warrior
(Metrosexual hairless RINOs for hopey-changey bipartisan-ness)
To: gorilla_warrior
Burglars should be given 20 years first offense, no parole. That would take 90% of the psychopaths off the streets for two decades.I prefer this victim's method of taking psychopaths off the streets. It's for longer than two decades. Much longer.
To: DemforBush
9
posted on
06/30/2009 1:16:39 AM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: gorilla_warrior
Democrats with unyielding liberal leanings consider armed robbery and burglary as a mere transfer of wealth and is justified because the government has failed to confiscate the victim’s unjustly(earned) wealth.
10
posted on
06/30/2009 1:23:18 AM PDT
by
monocle
To: South40
Don’t bring a gun to a fist fight......
You might get shot.
11
posted on
06/30/2009 1:28:59 AM PDT
by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: South40
So is the home owner going to be charged for firing a stolen gun that killed somebody?
Wouldn’t surprise me these days...
12
posted on
06/30/2009 1:37:57 AM PDT
by
DB
To: South40
Wonderful way to start the week! A story with a happy ending...
13
posted on
06/30/2009 1:45:28 AM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: DB
oh man... anything is possible now a days.
14
posted on
06/30/2009 1:54:30 AM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
To: SuperLuminal
A truly heart warming feel good story.
15
posted on
06/30/2009 2:13:58 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(AGWT is very robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it at the 100% confidence level.)
To: South40
Here in Indiana this babe could be charged for her friend's death.
My understanding is that if you commit a crime, any crime, and someone (anyone) dies as a result of that crime, then you can be charged for a homicide.
Neat.
16
posted on
06/30/2009 2:25:15 AM PDT
by
M.K. Borders
(All I require of my government is the liberty my Grandfathers were born to.)
To: South40
To: South40
Aren’t the gun-grabbers always telling us that a gun-owner is far more likely to shoot himself of a family memeber than an intruder?
This case is a little of both!
18
posted on
06/30/2009 2:38:30 AM PDT
by
bondjamesbond
(CO2 is like The Homeless. It only exists if there is a Republican in the White House.)
To: DB
So is the home owner going to be charged for firing a stolen gun that killed somebody? Another words the home owner may have violated the rights of the robber.
Yes the robber brought a gun, but that was to protect him from any robbers in the area. He had no intention of harming the home owner.
The robbers family may have a civil case here.
Liberal thinking.
19
posted on
06/30/2009 3:01:28 AM PDT
by
VicVega
(Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
To: bondjamesbond
Arent the gun-grabbers always telling us that a gun-owner is far more likely to shoot himself of a family memeber than an intruder? You're correct. And this will probably go into the column of people who are shot with their own gun during a crime, and used as an argument against gun ownership . . . "A person with a gun is X times more likely to have the gun taken away and used against him during a violent crime than to protect himself with the gun."
It's an Alice in Wonderland approach to gun control, but then most of the invented statistics gun grabbers use are nonsense, anyway.
20
posted on
06/30/2009 3:09:10 AM PDT
by
Quiller
(When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson