Another words the home owner may have violated the rights of the robber.
Yes the robber brought a gun, but that was to protect him from any robbers in the area. He had no intention of harming the home owner.
The robbers family may have a civil case here.
Liberal thinking.
What about firing a weapon that wasn’t registered to the shooter?
That’s a big deal here in California...
(I’m being facetious, but who knows...)