Obiviously any such undisclosed agreement with Israel is for the express purposes of providing the Israeli Air Force a more direct passage to portions of Iran's nuclear facilities ....
FYI Israeli news sources are also reporting on this story
1 posted on
06/20/2009 9:07:57 AM PDT by
VRWCTexan
To: VRWCTexan
Saudi Arabia has denied media reports that it intends to allow Israeli military planes to fly over its airspace....''No Saudi official has met with any Israeli official. Nothing to see here, now move along perhaps?
3 posted on
06/20/2009 9:17:49 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: VRWCTexan
It’s just to keep the attention away from the IAFs bases in Afghanistan....
4 posted on
06/20/2009 9:20:42 AM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 152 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: VRWCTexan
Of COURSE the Arab countries do NOT want Iran to get nukes.
Of COURSE the Arab countries NEVER want to support an an attack on Iran, by Israel, -— at least they will never admit that they support it!
5 posted on
06/20/2009 9:24:43 AM PDT by
Kansas58
To: VRWCTexan
Just like I have been predicting. The Saudi’s will turn a blind eye to a flyover and blame the “Little Satans” devilish technology for fooling them. The fact that both sides “officially deny” a deal is more telling. Also I believe part of the raid will come from forward airbases in India.
6 posted on
06/20/2009 9:27:40 AM PDT by
Polynikes
(Viene una tormenta)
To: VRWCTexan
Notice they deny a meeting. They do not deny that Israeli military may overfly Saudi Arabia.
9 posted on
06/20/2009 9:34:46 AM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Prowd gaduate of a Calefornica publik skewl.)
To: VRWCTexan
'No Saudi official has met with any Israeli official. This carefully constructed sentence makes me think there's something there. It's a very Clintonesque denial.
10 posted on
06/20/2009 9:48:49 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
To: VRWCTexan
Hmm, sounds like a “Baghdad Bob” denial. How good is their radar coverage over the empty quarter?
The question is, are the Saudis better off with a nuclear Iran or a non nuclear Iran?
11 posted on
06/20/2009 9:54:16 AM PDT by
silverleaf
("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
To: VRWCTexan
Israeli plains might have a backup option when returning from the operation, ie land (at least in emergency situations) in US air base in Afghanishan, or in Turkey or in Georgia.
The first strike would likely go over Iraq (only first strike), with some additional planes using other routes. I would assume that Israel might have couple of fully equipped planes visiting frequently air bases in Georgia and Turkey (so that one day they might pay a visit to Iran, instead of returning home).
12 posted on
06/20/2009 10:02:51 AM PDT by
heiss
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
17 posted on
06/21/2009 7:11:59 PM PDT by
SJackson
(G-d da*n America, Jeremiah Wright---Don't tell me words don't matter!, Barack Hussein Obama)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Saudi Arabia has denied media reports that it intends to allow Israeli military planes to fly over its airspace.
Gee, I wonder where those Israeli military planes might be headed? ;')
19 posted on
06/22/2009 3:56:38 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson