Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother

Great web-site! Thanks.

We will have to agree to disagree on two points: (1) the people that Ayn Rand was working against in the 1940’s were the collectivist planners (not liberals) depicted in that wonderful comic book; and (2) Her characters may be over the top (which befits her narcissistic amd obsessive personality) but they are wonderful symbols of individualism and self-reliance. I really enjoy her work precisely because her characters are “different”.


51 posted on 03/03/2009 12:44:55 PM PST by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: neocon1984
(1) Ah, the names have changed. Liberals are now collectivists, but they weren't then, and indeed I should have known better because Mr. Anthony Trollope was a "Liberal" in his day!

(2) The only place I can really stand characters who are symbols rather than living, breathing human beings is in something like The Pilgrim's Progress (although Bunyan's characters are breathing flesh-and-blood creatures compared to the likes of Taggart and Galt, despite their old-fashioned descriptive names). But that sort of set-piece only works when it doesn't attempt to exist in the Real World . . . I think Rand really couldn't decide if she was writing a novel, an allegory, or a polemic. A little of all three, perhaps.

52 posted on 03/03/2009 12:58:13 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse - TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson