Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djsherin

I would prefer the United States to stay connected and strong, but if having the states be sovereign means I won’t have a liberal President and Congress passing laws that I must follow, then I am all for it.


21 posted on 02/19/2009 7:07:16 PM PST by Vozda ("For equanimity in the face of blind hatred, I recommend Christianity." ~Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Vozda

What if it’s a “conservative” President and Congress passing liberal laws that you must follow?

Better put, what if it’s ANY party’s President and Congress passing unconstitutional laws that you must follow?


22 posted on 02/19/2009 7:09:15 PM PST by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Vozda

The States are already sovereign They just need to remind Congress

We are The United States of America not the American Union
As a country we elect only one position POTUS

Every other elected seat is done at state or below level


31 posted on 02/19/2009 7:28:06 PM PST by Popman (One useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three is a Congress - John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson