Congress sued to remove prez from White House

worldNetDaily.com ^ | January 31, 2009 | WorldNetDaily

[Jet Jaguar]

A new lawsuit is challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, and this one targets Congress as a defendant for its "failure" to uphold the constitutional demand to make sure Obama qualified before approving the Electoral College vote that actually designated him as the occupant of the Oval Office.

The new case raises many of the same arguments as dozens of other cases that have flooded into courtrooms around the nation since the November election.

It is being brought on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. and names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 193,000 others and sign up now!

As WND has reported, dozens of lawsuits have been filed over Obama's eligibility to assume the office of the president. Many have been dismissed while others remain pending.

The cases, in various ways, have alleged Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

[null and void]

For $12 Borat 0bama could make this go away forever.

[Eye of Unk]

Obama is ineligible?

When did this happen?

/satire

[null and void]

1961...

[STARWISE]

~~Ding!

[Eye of Unk]

[mojitojoe]

Dam how many times does zer0 have to tell you, factcheck has it. That’s proof. *rolls eyes*

[ponygirl]

I just looked at the so-called "birth certificate" again, and I still see a document revision date of 11/2001 in the bottom corner, a time stamp of 2007 leaking through the back of the paper, and I still see no attending physician's signature, physician's license number, or mother's signature anywhere on the thing.

This is nothing more than a transcription of a true microfilm record, and most likely altered.

[lilylangtree]

YYYYYeeeessssss!!!!!! Gotta bring this to more voters attention. Hot diggity dog!

[Jet Jaguar]

ping.

[Fred Nerks]

http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/

Obama’s Born Conspiracy: Obama’s bogus birth certificate exposed!
By Polarik at 5:09 AM on 11/22/2008
WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM: Nothing like the truth
By Polarik at 8:53 PM on 10/30/2008
UPDATE: FactCheck’s photos of Obama’s paper birth certificate proves, once and for all, that their image of it was a forgery!
By Polarik at 11:05 PM on 8/22/2008
EXCLUSIVE! OBAMA’S FAKE BIRTH CERTIFICATE: How the forgery was made.
By Polarik at 3:34 PM on 7/23/2008
Was Obama’s “Certificate of Birth” manufactured?
By Polarik at 11:45 AM on 6/13/2008

[hoosiermama]

No mention of the DC case?

[ponygirl]

Picture of a real Hawaiian birth certificate from 1963:

Notice the signatures, which are missing from The One's fake bc. Posted here.

[BrerLion]

This is not a fake.  It is on the internet!

BREAKING: Barrack Obama SMARTER than some voters!

[Gator113]

Hey Obama,

You shouldn’t have left that sliver in your butt, it’s going to hurt for a long, long time, boy.

[chuck_the_tv_out]

lib cartoon has “USA” as a crazy guy in back of busted car that 0 trying to fix. so this is representative of your politics?

[musicman]

My FR tagline:

Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC,

he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID"

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

“join more than 193,000 others and sign up now!”

AKA” the to be audited list!

[DeaconRed]

Well Shut my little mouth.
There may be hope after all. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[Canedawg]

BC ping