Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ricks_place
Maryland is only the latest state to prove the folly of trying to finance government with a tax on a shrinking pool of smokers.

Originally, these exorbitant tobacco taxes were supposed to be used to pay for smoking-related health costs. The logic being that if people quit smoking, health costs would go down and the taxes wouldn't be missed.

Yeah, right!

Now cigarette taxes are being used for everything from parks & recreation, children's health care, schools and balancing budgets. Are any of these taxes used for smoking related costs anymore? I doubt it. Needless to say, when people quit smoking (or otherwise evade paying these increasingly exorbitant tobacco taxes) something else is going to have to be taxed to make up for the loss of revenue. How many of those people who supported cigarette taxes wholeheartedly even considered this?

By raising the cost of cigarettes to $4, $5 and even $9 a pack, they've killed the golden goose and either motivated people to quit or sent them to find black market sources. Gotta love the Law of Unintended Consequences. It proves itself true every time.

17 posted on 08/10/2008 8:47:49 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68

As an aside I have decided to NEVER admit I smoke to anyone anymore. Congratulate me. I’m in the unhooked generation.


51 posted on 08/11/2008 6:57:59 AM PDT by ichabod1 (If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it, and if it stops moving, subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson