Posted on 07/24/2008 6:56:42 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
More excellent points.
Though I trust you have a more vast storehouse of pearls still in safe keeping.
Actually, you’re right, and the security and electronics at a major missile silo group in Montana found out they were completely disabled when a UFO was present at their gate.
Thank you for your logical and accurate post.
Hard to say 100% absolutely.
There are some mixed stories from some of the past 60 years.
That’s what tickles me about the whole flying saucer thing. As referred to earlier, on the one hand aliens “abduct” us, and on the other hand they’re benign, and humans are the only ones to fear.
And the Military really really really has actual aliens in captivity, even though they’d be helpless against electricity-robbing flying saucers capable of traversing interstellar distances.
All this stuff is like something out of Hollyweird. There’s a tilted playing field, where we just might have a chance, when in actuality we’d be totally helpless against an advanced race, same as a tribe of Pygmies would be helpless against even France! :)
Timothy Good
on C2C tonight said that
Archbishop McIntire of Los Angeles
was with Ike [President Eisenhower] when ET’s landed multiple craft at Edwards AFB by prior arrangement in 1954 . . . demonstrating amongst other things, their capacity to render their craft and themselves invisible.
One of Ike’s responses was that he didn’t think we were ready for that yet.
############
I have met and talked with Timothy at length. I have read his books. He is an authentic very serious and very solid researcher. He is British methodical and very thorough.
He’s quite ready to say “I don’t know.”
When he asserts something as fact, or that he believes it to be fact, he says it in either flat terms or qualified terms depending on the evidence he’s turned up. Most of the time he says things with qualifiers . . . such as I believe that occurred etc.
However, he’s so thorough and methodical that he’s tops at being able to turn up multiple first hand sources confirming the same thing. He’s an excellent detective on that score.
When he says Archbishop McIntire was at the Edwards landing, one can be certain that the Archbishop was there.
######################
Of course, it is inconceivable that the Archbishop was there without giving a full report to the Pope. And, it is inconceivable that said report has not been read by each succeeding Pope.
Interestingly, it was WELL AFTER this event that the Vatican spent so much money on a high quality telescope—I think in the American Southwest.
####################
It may well be the case that typical naysaying responses will be ignored.
So the Catholics are in on the Big Secret, huh?
*snicker*
No thanks.
Snickers are toooo sweet and gum up my teeth too much.
I was pleasantly surprised to be voted into Who’s Who by my PhD faculty and classmates.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080518203349AAmo2hd
E.
The prince of the air is decietful, very decietful.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.