Posted on 04/14/2008 10:11:41 PM PDT by TBP
“You’ve convinced me that you are going to help put Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama in the White House.”
This is how a friend of mine tried to wrap up a political discussion last weekend. The circumstances were unusual, even if the comment was not. Usually, you’ll find a lone Keyes backer being numerically outgunned by a bunch of RINOs. In this case, the sole McCain supporter found himself faced with an enthusiastic and well-informed circle of Keyes people.
It is interesting that he had nothing to say about our arguments themselves. A good guy at heart, he conceded the moral and civic points that we raised. Then, disappointingly, he fell back on the same old “lesser-of-two-evils” approach that the Republican leadership has been serving up for decades now. The idea that the only way to win is to concede defeat at the very outset, by backing a candidate who doesn’t stand for conservative principle in the first place, has itself come to fruition in the presumptive nomination of John McCain as the Republican candidate for 2008. Is this not, in and of itself, enough to convince us at last of the wrong-headedness of this approach?
This type of thinking constitutes textbook “enabling behavior,” in the vernacular of popular psychology. Just as the wife of an alcoholic is supposed to “save the family” by calling in sick for her hung-over husband, we conservatives are being pressured to “save the White House for Republicans” by facilitating the socialist mentality. “What are you trying to do, get me fired?” the husband demands, if she mentions any qualms. It is easy to see that, if he did lose his job, the fault would be his own and not hers. Why then can we not see that it is up to the politician to earn the conservative vote, and not up to the conservatives to put into office a politician who has chronically failed them?
The pressure to be political enablers needs to be staunchly resisted. The once-great Republican party has, in nominating John McCain, crossed the line from viable to suicidal, and many well-intentioned Americans know it. That is why they are saying they will not vote for him, even at the cost of not voting at all. Yet to allow the RINOs to effectively disenfranchise us is not acceptable, either. So, where do we go from here?
Before we look ahead, let’s look back. The Republicans are the heirs of the Lincoln legacy, but what does that truly mean? During the era of slavery, there was a party — the Democrats — that refused to stand against the ungodly and un-American evil of its time. There was another party — the Whigs — that let its opposition to slavery be watered down to the point of irrelevance. It was in this context that a third party known as the Republicans providentially arose.
Lincoln didn’t make it his life’s objective to rehabilitate a dying political party. During the nineteenth century crisis of the Republic, he saw to it that American identity and sovereignty — as well as the dignity and life of every American — was, in principle, preserved. There were challenges, and unspeakable sacrifice, but Lincoln’s cause was ultimately the cause of God Himself, and it was God who saw it through.
In our own time, we have again seen the American mission assaulted not only from without, but also from within. Socialism renamed “liberalism” has been foisting an ersatz version of our country’s character upon us, while the existing party structure has proven unable or unwilling to stand in the gap. God, however, is still able to achieve His designs for this world, and it is with Him that we must finally cooperate.
Alan Keyes, as you know, has ended his lifelong affiliation with the Republicans. This is a step the Ambassador has not taken lightly, and neither should any of us who are considering a similar move. He has chosen to seek the presidential nomination of the Constitution party, and he asks that you prayerfully consider supporting him in this path.
Many of you took the time to respond to the questionnaire we sent out regarding whether or not Alan ought to go third party. The overwhelming majority of responses were in favor of his doing so. You wrote: Alan has always been the best choice, and the Constitution Party is an exciting, hopeful option for the millions of disappointed Americans who do not know another choice exists.
I will vote for Dr. Keyes based on his life’s work and not on his party affiliation.
I have always voted Republican, but today we have no “life” protection under their party. It is a fearful thought to envision life under the domination of any current (major party) candidate.
Either way, I am supporting Alan Keyes for President of the United States of America. I have voted for him before and I will continue to vote for him until elected.
As a Republican it is hard not to fall in line, but if Alan Keyes joins the Constitution Party and runs as its candidate, I will not only vote for him; I will switch my party affiliation.
Understanding all that he stands for, I will vote for Alan Keyes no matter what!
We the people have no choice in this election. As soon as Alan Keyes makes it formal and runs on a third party ticket, I will be joining that party with him. True patriots have no choice. Dr. Keyes has frequently noted that he is running for President because principled conservatives are being offered no way of participating in politics in this country without violating their own beliefs. To say that Alan is the “best choice” expresses this fact, yet inadvertently masks another reality. As Americans and as believers, we recognize that there are things that lie beyond the reach of our own decisions.
Keyes truly is the choice about which we have no choice; a vote in acknowledgment of that which cannot — strictly speaking — be voted on in the first place. We too hold certain truths to be self-evident. Among them are the fact that the lesser of two evils is still evil, and that if John McCain fails to be inaugurated next January, he and the Republican leadership will not need to look beyond the frames of their own mirrors in determining exactly who is to blame.
Since when does a real conservative support slave reparations?
Keyes is an opportunist instead of a conservative.
“Stand your ground, you’re killing me, Pop.”
“The idea that the only way to win is to concede defeat at the very outset, by backing a candidate who doesn’t stand for conservative principle in the first place”
How I hate that philosophy. Repubs used it to beat conservatives up in the ‘96 election when Dole ran. Now these people are doing again with McPain. I called John Hagee ministries because I enjoy the man’s message and told the customer service rep what I really thought of McPain. Today I got an email espousing the same philosophy. Hagee’s supporting McPain because it’s the only way to win. Yeow!
I won’t be voting for any of the three socialists who might win the nominations of their respective parties. Whether or not I’ll vote for Keyes is something I’ll have to think about.
I, too, however, am finished with the Republican party.
To achieve victory, first you must seek it.
How does putting country-club, Rockefeller Republicans in ofice win us anything?
Keyes is not, nor has he ever been for slave reparations. You are misinformed.
RINO? Keyes left the GOP. Keyes ran such a horrible race that he made Barack Obama a big star. He ran twice for president and lost badly. He lost his race for senate in Maryland. People aren't buying what Keyes is selling. The idea that the only way to win is to concede defeat at the very outset, by backing a candidate who doesn’t stand for conservative principle in the first place, has itself come to fruition in the presumptive nomination of John McCain as the Republican candidate for 2008. Is this not, in and of itself, enough to convince us at last of the wrong-headedness of this approach?
John McCain has his faults, but when it was time to walk the walk on pork barrel spending, he did. When it was time to confirm Supreme Court justices, he voted for Roberts and Alito. On guns he's not where I'd be, but he did vote against the so called assault weapons ban on multiple occasions. He voted to end frivolous lawsuits against gun manufacturers. Obama and Hillary both oppose Roberts and Alito. In January 09, most Supreme Court justices will be in their 70's. The next president will appoint probably 2, maybe four justices.
we conservatives are being pressured to “save the White House for Republicans” by facilitating the socialist mentality.
Socialists increase government spending. McCain doesn't do that.
Why then can we not see that it is up to the politician to earn the conservative vote, and not up to the conservatives to put into office a politician who has chronically failed them?
That's why we have primaries. I voted for the conservative candidate in the primary. His name is Ron Paul.
The once-great Republican party has, in nominating John McCain, crossed the line from viable to suicidal, and many well-intentioned Americans know it.
Suicidal? Look, the GOP survived Grant, Taft, and even Hoover. It survived Nixon. It survived Bush I and will even survive the current democrat-lite guy that is currently in office.
That is why they are saying they will not vote for him, even at the cost of not voting at all. Yet to allow the RINOs to effectively disenfranchise us is not acceptable, either. So, where do we go from here?
Keyes left the GOP, so what's he doing complaining about RINOs?
We the people have no choice in this election. As soon as Alan Keyes makes it formal and runs on a third party ticket, I will be joining that party with him. True patriots have no choice.
I have a choice. No thanks to Keyes. Someone who got 27% against Obama already isn't going to get my support.
Dr. Keyes has frequently noted that he is running for President because principled conservatives are being offered no way of participating in politics in this country without violating their own beliefs. That's crap. I participate in politics. I paid my dues walking precincts, stuffing envelops, and running for delegate, winning every time I've run. That's not changing anytime soon with McCain running.
As Americans and as believers, we recognize that there are things that lie beyond the reach of our own decisions.
Not really.
Among them are the fact that the lesser of two evils is still evil, and that if John McCain fails to be inaugurated next January, he and the Republican leadership will not need to look beyond the frames of their own mirrors in determining exactly who is to blame.
Hell, McCain's probably an improvement over the current guy, at least with some issues.
2004 Senate, Illinois.
Obama - 3,597,456 - 70%
Keyes - 1,390,690 - 27%
Same year, Illinois:
Kerry - 2,891,550 - 55%
Bush - 2,345,946 - 44%
2002 - A sacrificial lamb year for Illinois Senate
Durbin - 2,080,411 60%
Durkin - 1,320,621 38%
Keyes ran 17% behind Bush in one of his weakest states. So many people who voted for Bush voted for Obama against Keyes. He ran 11% behind Durkin in another democrat year in Illinois, 2002. Durkin was a sacrificial lamb and got what should be a bare minimum in Illinois. That's not counting the fact that Keyes has run numerous times for president in the past and went nowhere each time.
I'll go so far to say that I blame two people more than anything else for making Obama into a media star. One is Jack Ryan for screwing up and letting Jeri Ryan get away (dropping out of the race), and the other is Alan Keyes for carpetbagging and running a complete Charlie Foxtrot of a campaign.
Keyes needs to back out of running and go back to the speaker's circuit where he does best. He gave us Senator Obama. I don't need him to give us President Obama.
It wasn’t enough for Keyes to carpetbag Illinios, now he’s going to carpetbag the Constitution Party.
I’m sure the grass (greenbacks) will be greener for him there and I say don’t let the door...
2004 Senate, Illinois.
Obama - 3,597,456 - 70%
Keyes - 1,390,690 - 27%
Guess Illinois just wasn’t ready for a black Senator.
“You only waste your vote when you vote for that in which yo do not believe.”
You never get everything you want in politics, I’m at about 70% with McCain which is higher than I was with Bush.
“Why waste your vote when there is a real conservative alternative?”
So your solution to “not waste your vote” is to vote for a man who cannot get elected?
This is the insanity of 3rd Party self immolation. But don’t worry about Keyes and his organizations, I’m sure they will do “very well” with a smaller yet more focused audience.
Great article.
Alan Keyes is light years better than the three Democrats that are still running.
Alan Keyes/America’s Revival/CP PING!
i hate how the "third party" option only comes up when it's too late to really do anything... run the third party immediately--when the other two parties begin... make it a real party, not just a last-minute thought... the GOP nominees right from the start left us begging for an alternative... now it really is too late... we need to start now for next time... it won't work this time...
5th time's the charm for the Keyester??? He's the 2000's version of Pat Buchanan making a living off of running for office.
I wonder when Alan's next book is coming out....
Gee. That's funny... He's a -30% for me, and tat's being kind.
So your solution to “not waste your vote” is to vote for a man who cannot get elected?
No, my idea of wasting my vote is using it to put a traitorous bastard at the head of the Republican party with the dishonorable leadership thereof continuing their Globalist dreams ever onward.
Keyes is a genuine Reagan Republican, and a Conservative of the highest order. That is worth voting for.
Why? It's almost seven months until the General Election.
Then vote for him, nobody cares.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.