Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House votes to renew Internet tax block
AP via Yahoo! News ^ | 10/16/07 | JOHN DUNBAR

Posted on 10/16/2007 12:54:48 PM PDT by libertarianPA

WASHINGTON - The House on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved a four-year extension of a moratorium on state and local taxes on Internet access, despite widespread support in both parties for a permanent ban.

The tax ban, first passed in 1998, is set to expire on Nov. 1. The extension exempts some states that approved taxes prior to the original enactment.

The vote was 405-2.

"This bill is pro consumer, pro innovation and pro technology," said Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C., one of the bill's sponsors.

The bill to extend the tax break fell short of the permanent exemption that many lawmakers favor. A bill to make the moratorium permanent has 238 House co-sponsors, more than a majority.

Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said a permanent ban would ensure that businesses would continue to invest in the Internet and keep access affordable for users. He charged that by limiting the House to consideration of a temporary extension, Democratic leaders "want to leave the door open to taxing the Internet in the future."

Watt, however, argued that a temporary ban was the right way to go both for political and practical reasons.

The Senate, which must act next on the legislation, has "in many ways made it clear that a permanent moratorium would be dead on arrival," Watt said. Without quick action, the ban was in danger of expiring before new legislation could pass, he said.

Watt said the bill also will allow lawmakers to make changes as needed, as has occurred the two times the moratorium has been extended since 1998.

Action is uncertain in the Senate, where there is also considerable support for a permanent tax ban.

The bill is HR 3678.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: 110th; ban; congress; internet; internettaxes; tax
It's only a matter of time. Just wait a few years when the moratorium ends and Social Security and whatever form of universal health care they have in place begins to choke the national budget... I mean even more so than now.
1 posted on 10/16/2007 12:54:50 PM PDT by libertarianPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Funny, some people have been using that argument for the last few years up to yesterday.


2 posted on 10/16/2007 12:57:03 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Who were the dissenters?

Bernie Sanders? Dr. No himself?

H


3 posted on 10/16/2007 12:58:06 PM PDT by SnakeDoctor (How 'Bout Them Cowboys!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Here in PA you need to account for all internet purchases and pay state taxes on them. Wonder how many people do this?


4 posted on 10/16/2007 12:58:30 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

The list of who voted for and against isn’t up yet.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/index.asp


5 posted on 10/16/2007 12:58:54 PM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

“Here in PA you need to account for all internet purchases and pay state taxes on them.”

Even used stuff on Ebay?


6 posted on 10/16/2007 1:04:40 PM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Yeah : )


7 posted on 10/16/2007 1:08:25 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

There is a difference between them asking you to do it, and people actually doing it, though.


8 posted on 10/16/2007 1:15:06 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

The RATS and or the PUBS will have a fight on their hands should they try to tax the internet. A massive public outcry would definitely ensue.


9 posted on 10/16/2007 1:15:31 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

This is a ban on taxing the use of the internet and has nothing to do with sales taxes. Right?


10 posted on 10/16/2007 1:18:37 PM PDT by antinomian (Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

And I’m sure people said exactly THAT about the notion of an income tax right up until 1916.


11 posted on 10/16/2007 1:19:12 PM PDT by libertarianPA (http://www.amarxica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Wow, this is gonna piss off all the socialist states.


12 posted on 10/16/2007 1:21:06 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Here in PA you need to account for all internet purchases and pay state taxes on them.

I lived in Delaware back in the 70's and I remember Penn being pretty nasty about their citizens making major purchases in Delaware where there was no sales tax.

It was really crazy with alcohol. In Delaware you had to be 21 to buy alcohol, but in Penn it was 18. So 18 year olds went to Penn and Penn adults went to Delaware.

13 posted on 10/16/2007 1:28:48 PM PDT by antinomian (Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

It’s these permanent Chicken Little battles that end up working against us. We won. Put it aside for a year. It’s like Al Gore and John Kerry continuing to run as a candidate for the Presidency though “W” has already been sworn in and is well on the job.


14 posted on 10/16/2007 1:29:33 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hemorrhage

The No votes were Eshoo & Turner. I’m surprised ‘Dr. No’ didn’t find a period out of place or something..


15 posted on 10/16/2007 1:34:17 PM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Fast eddie as leader of the backward state, and yes I live in Pa.


16 posted on 10/16/2007 4:19:21 PM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: antinomian

Yep. This is not for online purchases.


17 posted on 10/16/2007 4:23:48 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Satisfaction was my sin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Is the Senate moving on this?


18 posted on 10/24/2007 1:47:43 PM PDT by plsjr (one of His <><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: plsjr

I dunno, I have been otherwise distracted.


19 posted on 10/24/2007 1:53:38 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. "What happens if neutrinos have mass?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson