Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/18/2007 9:38:07 AM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hal1950

How does inerting tanks prevent against SAMs again?


2 posted on 07/18/2007 9:39:02 AM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

Sorry..but I don’t believe the whole truth has been disclosed regarding TWA 800 or the Oklahoma City bombing.


4 posted on 07/18/2007 9:40:57 AM PDT by Fast Ed97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
"It's like they're waiting for another fuel tank to explode before they act," said Hurd, vice president of the Families of TWA Flight 800 Association.

It's going to be a long wait - unless some surface to air missile makes a direct strike on a 747 fuel tank.

5 posted on 07/18/2007 9:41:44 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

They are going to wait a long time for the fuel tank to blow. I don’t think it will ever happen again.


6 posted on 07/18/2007 9:44:42 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Satan is working both sides of the street in World Socialism and World Courts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

Fuel tank fears hoax linger(s) 11 years after TWA 800 crash


8 posted on 07/18/2007 9:46:54 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
A good summary of what really happened.
9 posted on 07/18/2007 9:48:06 AM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

The only reason they need to fear the fuel tanks is if a missle hits them.


10 posted on 07/18/2007 9:49:05 AM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear..on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
he urges airline industry groups to outfit airplanes with a device that would have prevented the explosion that killed his son

A flare dispenser.

11 posted on 07/18/2007 9:49:15 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
Yet 11 years after the center fuel tank of TWA Flight 800 caught fire, killing 230 people, the Federal Aviation Administration still does not require commercial jetliners to carry devices to make the fuel in their tanks inert,

That because they know this is phonier than a three dollar bill.

12 posted on 07/18/2007 9:49:40 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

Good angle. What better way to get truth out than to force industry to spend billions on something unnecessary.


13 posted on 07/18/2007 9:49:57 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

Yeah, those "fuel tanks" are a Biotch!!

14 posted on 07/18/2007 9:53:42 AM PDT by blues_guitarist ( . . . As in the days of Noah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
I have no problem with safety. But, I do have problems with the way the investigation was done and with the information the investigators chose to not include. I am not saying that a frayed low voltage (high current?) wire could not have caused a fuel tank explosion. The military recognizes the potential and uses nitrogen systems to prevent f.t. explosions.

However, they are very rare in commercial and private aircraft, even in piston aircraft which use a much more volitile fuel. For that matter, they are rare even in automobiles which also use a more volitial fuel than a jet.

What I am saying is that, in the age of Islamic terror and during a Clinton administration which chose to ignore it and which also had so many questionable events with even more questionable explanations, the official cause of Flt 800's demise is more difficult to believe.

16 posted on 07/18/2007 9:55:44 AM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
Anytime these TWA 800 threads come up, I always say this...
You cannot discuss the cover-up of TWA 800 without refering to Jack Cashill

http://www.cashill.com/twa800/index.htm


20 posted on 07/18/2007 10:06:16 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

I still think that center fuel tank story is a cover story for what really happened. There were just too many people who saw something else that day.


21 posted on 07/18/2007 10:09:37 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

It’s pretty apparent, isn’t it, that the aviation community doesn’t believe that that fuel tank exploded.


24 posted on 07/18/2007 11:13:37 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

If it was actually the fuel tanks, they would have grounded 747’s the next day. Nope. It isn’t the fuel tanks.


25 posted on 07/18/2007 11:39:19 AM PDT by Bigoleelephant (Lawyers are to America what lead was to Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

Did NASA ever believe Grissom’s story that his Mercury Capsule hatch ‘just blew’?


30 posted on 07/18/2007 1:01:44 PM PDT by AU72 (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950

It wasn’t a spark in the fuel tank! We all know that. check
with the 100 witnesses as to what they saw.


31 posted on 07/18/2007 8:46:53 PM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson