Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge suing dry cleaner cries over pants
, Associated Press ^ | June 12, 2007 | LUBNA TAKRURI

Posted on 06/12/2007 7:10:56 PM PDT by Baladas

WASHINGTON - A judge had to leave the courtroom with tears running down his face Tuesday after recalling the lost pair of trousers that led to his $54 million lawsuit against a dry cleaner.

Administrative law judge Roy L. Pearson had argued earlier in his opening statement that he is acting in the interest of all city residents against poor business practices. Defense attorneys called his claim "outlandish."

He originally sued Custom Cleaners for about $65 million under the District of Columbia consumer protection act and almost $2 million in common law claims. He is no longer seeking damages related to the pants, instead focusing his claims on two signs in the shop that have since been removed.

He alleges that Jin Chung, Soo Chung and Ki Chung, owners of the mom-and-pop business, committed fraud and misled consumers with signs that claimed "Satisfaction Guaranteed" and "Same Day Service."

Pearson, representing himself, said in opening that he wanted to examine the culture that allowed "a group of defendants to engage in bad business practices for five years."

An attorney for the Chungs portrayed Pearson as a bitter man with financial troubles stemming from a recent divorce who is taking out his anger on a hardworking family.

"This case is very simple. It's about one sign and the plaintiff's outlandish interpretation," attorney Chris Manning said.

The Chungs were to present their case Wednesday. Manning asked D.C. Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff to award them reimbursement for their legal costs if they win.

Pearson called several witnesses Tuesday who testified that they stopped going to Custom Cleaners after problems with misplaced clothes.

Pearson also called himself as a witness, saying his problems began in May 2005 when he brought in several suits for alterations. A pair of pants from a blue and maroon suit was missing when he requested it two days later. He said Soo Chung tried to give him a pair of charcoal gray pants.

As Pearson explained that those weren't the pants for the suit, he choked up and left the courtroom crying after asking Bartnoff for a break.

Pearson originally asked the cleaners for the full price of the suit, which was more than $1,000. But because the Chungs insisted the pants had been found, they refused to pay.

Manning has said the cleaners made three settlement offers to Pearson, but the judge was not satisfied and increased his demands — including asking for money to rent a car so he could drive to another business.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: court; frivilouslawsuits; litigation; maliciousprosecution; roypearson; tortreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last
To: Baladas
No he is a sick man...taking advantage of the "system".

I cannot believe that any court in our land would allow a "lawsuit" like this to darken its doors.

Administrative law judge Roy L. Pearson should be held for mental evaluation and made to pay compensation to Jin Chung, Soo Chung and Ki Chung for all their troubles.

"Cases" like this are making a joke of our courts. Mr Pearson should have been laughed out of court and taken into custody the first day.

101 posted on 06/13/2007 5:54:01 AM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

I still think the guy should just button up instead of pressing this case.


102 posted on 06/13/2007 6:01:09 AM PDT by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
"This person is a judge????"

Not really.

He's an "administrative law judge" which is a fancy term for a hearing examiner. He presides at an administrative trial-type hearing to resolve a dispute between a government agency and someone affected by a decision of that agency.

103 posted on 06/13/2007 6:20:14 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Tort reform! Loser pays!


104 posted on 06/13/2007 6:21:24 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas; TommyDale

I think they should have returned him a box of Pampers instead of a pair of pants.


105 posted on 06/13/2007 6:22:50 AM PDT by dforest (Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
"I think they should have returned him a box of Pampers instead of a pair of pants."

Yes, and filled by a 12 month old...

106 posted on 06/13/2007 6:33:10 AM PDT by TommyDale (Rudy Giuliani’s candidacy is fading faster than an abortionist’s conscience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

jumpin’ jihad...this guy needs a trip to GITMO...as a prisoner.


107 posted on 06/13/2007 6:34:07 AM PDT by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

If the account number for your Swiss Bank account was on a piece of paper in those pants you’d be crying also.


108 posted on 06/13/2007 6:35:46 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955

I think he wants proof that that exact pair is cleaned and returned...I wonder whose pants they really were, and what stains were on them that made them so important? This guy wasn’t appointed by Clinton, was he? I wonder if they were bill Clinton’s pants...now crying over Monica’s dress, I can understand.


109 posted on 06/13/2007 7:09:08 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

This guy needs to be locked away in solitary confinement for the rest of his life. He has a mental illness that is dangerous to society.


110 posted on 06/13/2007 7:28:26 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

He needs to have a mental health evaluation forthwith.

Even in DC they are smart enough to see this guy is nuts.


111 posted on 06/13/2007 7:30:59 AM PDT by Armedanddangerous (Master of Sinanju (emeritus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith
“I had a cleaner destroy a VERY expensive Albert Nipon suit, and claim I brought it in damaged. The statute of limitations hasn’t expired. I do sympathize with this guy. I cried. It was my FAV !”

Then you should quit crying and sue for damages. Did you pay 65 million for the suit? No? Then quit sympathizing with this guy. He is a grade a @ss and unless you want us to think you are as well, you need to get a grip.

112 posted on 06/13/2007 7:44:03 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
I don't know if this is gonna work, but here's this looney-tunes guy (maybe!):


113 posted on 06/13/2007 7:48:24 AM PDT by RogerWilko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy
I still think the guy should just button up instead of pressing this case.

I was going to write something about "pressing a suit" but you beat me to it.

114 posted on 06/13/2007 11:09:44 AM PDT by MoochPooch (I'm a compassionate cynic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RogerWilko
Here's another screen grab, don't know if it's any clearer: Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Is he wearing a track suit?!
115 posted on 06/13/2007 11:16:00 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom, Bible Thumper and Proud to be an American! RUN, FRED, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
A pair of pants from a blue and maroon suit

He should wear a maroon suit, becuase that's what he is -- a maroon!

116 posted on 06/13/2007 2:16:09 PM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
throws nothing out of court, no matter how outlandish or churlish

Yeah. Kind of stays with the NPR theme of "All Things Considered".

117 posted on 06/13/2007 4:18:11 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson