Posted on 02/22/2007 6:22:34 PM PST by Boxen
err-or! er-ror - 404!
The dog ate your webpage. Yeah, that's it.
Actually, we couldn't find the page you requested. Please check the URL.
so here's a graphical characterization that says it all:
Dont pout about it scrutinizer!
Another mistake.
Try clicking on it: www.angelfire.com/mi/carbondating.html
I have added "http://" for the above html, but otherwise its your link.
You can't even get a link to a creationist site right. And we are supposed to trust what you post?
Your credibility is sinking even lower, if that's possible.
There are many scientists to this day as well as the past and even those who could have been atheists regardless of darwins junk science! who do not believe in evolution, thousands!
But there are many religious to this day as well as the past and even those who could have been believers regardless of junk theology! who do believe in evolution, millions!
Ok try this site.
www.bible.ca
radio metric dating
I tried radio metric dating once. Unfortunately, I'm too strongly tied to English units. When it came down to the nuts and bolts, we didn't fit together when we screwed.
False. You've been refuted so often its pathetic. You and science are not even within light years of each other.
But you seem immune to fact, logic, reason, the findings of science, and anything else outside of your tiny artificial worldview.
I am beginning to wonder if you are for real. None of the other creationists on the site are quite as in-your-face-far-out as you are.
If someone was trying to mimic the bad characteristics of creationists, and take them to the most ridiculous extreme possible, I imagine they would post somewhat like you do.
You say millions? The bible does say narrow is the way that leads to life and few their be that find it!
and wide is the way and broad is the gate that leads to destruction and many there will be that enter there in.
I never got past the antenna ...
Ive shown you countless science, did you look up the site radi metric dating? www.bible.ca its full of science and it shows as many scientists who use to be evolutionists and no longer are they also point out these gross errors and out rite lies by evolutionists propagandists..
In any case,
"Don't you see yon narrow, narrow road,
So thick beset with thorns and briars?
That is the road to righteousness,
Though after it but few enquire."
"Don't you see yon broad, broad road,
Lying lies across the lily leaven?
That is the road to wickedness,
Though some call it the road to heaven."
"Don't you see yon bonnie, bonnie road,
Lying across the ferny brae?
That is the road to fair Elfland,
Where you and I this night must gae."
-"Thomas the Rhymer"
Trad. Scots.
It's that third road that makes things intereting, nu?
And the article is a laugh. In one of its major points it cites dates in Radiocarbon only up to 1969? What a joke! There have been hundreds of thousands of dates done since then, and the technique has been improved greatly. And what it did cite was riddled with errors.
Why is it that creationists can't make their case on its merits, and have to deliberately mislead folks and distort the scientific evidence?
No wonder scientists don't take creationists or creation "science" seriously.
Most issues of Radiocarbon are on line, and folks can check them out for themselves.
Here are some good links for those who want to see what radiocarbon dating is really about:
ReligiousTolerance.org Carbon-14 Dating (C-14): Beliefs of New-Earth CreationistsRadiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective by Dr. Roger C. Wiens.
This site, BiblicalChronologist.org has a series of good articles on radiocarbon dating.
Are tree-ring chronologies reliable? (The Biblical Chronologist, Vol. 5, No. 1)
Tree Ring and C14 DatingHow does the radiocarbon dating method work? (The Biblical Chronologist, Vol. 5, No. 1)
How precise is radiocarbon dating?
Is radiocarbon dating based on assumptions?
Has radiocarbon dating been invalidated by unreasonable results?
Radiocarbon WEB-info Radiocarbon Laboratory, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
What third road? there is no third road even in the natural world there is no third road! you either do or you dont, all reasoning is exclusive, so you need to make the wise decision in your choices. You either choose one way or you dont, a statement is either true or false! there is no third road. quit reading goofy poems and wakeup!
Face it, --the competition is pretty tough ...
Wake you up, wake you up, you seven sleepers,
And do take warning of me;
O do take care of your oldest daughter dear,
For the youngest are going with me.
-"Earl Brand"
Trad.
Ha! What a laugh.
One section of this press release says,
One Darwinist went so far as to say they are not ready to respond to this if it gets out into the "wider arena." Patrick Henry, a moderator at darwincentral.org posts, "I have faith in this kid. Science has obviously lost its way. But with this kid's scientific insights, and a bit of Plato's mysticism, we may have an opportunity to get back on track."The poster who registered at darwincentral.org as "the kid" and tried to peddle his unscientific nonsense couldn't even detect satire when he was hit over the head with it.
The full thread is here, in the Darwin Central Zoo (where we store crackpots, trolls, and assorted nuts)!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.