Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US: We will independently impose sanctions on Iran
Yedioth Internet ^ | 08.26.06, | Yitzhak Benhorrin

Posted on 08/26/2006 12:54:04 PM PDT by M. Espinola

US worriedly watches as Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad inaugurated heavy-water reactor and prepares to implement measures after UN Security Council ultimatum expires this upcoming Thursday. Los Angeles Times: If Russia and China thwart international sanctions, US will build independent coalition to impose sanctions.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, left, inaugurating a heavy-water nuclear facility in the central Iranian town of Arak on Saturday (AP)

Even after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad inaugurated the Iranian heavy-water reactor Saturday, the US will have a hard time convincing Russia and China to support sanctions in the Security Council. Official sources in Bush's cabinet said to newspaper Los Angeles Times that if these efforts fail, the US will try to build an independent coalition to impose sanctions on Tehran.

According to the newspaper's headline report, the countries that will participate in a coalition against Iran will freeze assets and will impose sanctions on commerce with Iran. This upcoming Thursday the ultimatum put forth by the UN to Tehran to halt uranium enrichment within the framework of UN Resolution 1696 will expire.

The US believes that Japan and the European trio - Germany, France, and Britain – will provide the base for international rallying outside the Security Council in the case that Russia and China block the sanctions.

Senior US government officials are currently on vacation. President Bush is with his parents in Maine and even Secretary of State Rice is on vacation. US Permanent Representative to the UN, John Bolton is still working and said in an interview with the Los Angeles Times that the US intends to present a resolution to the Security Council for the punishment of Iran immediately after the UN ultimatum expires on Thursday.

The most immediate sanctions will be directed at the Iranian administration, and will not, at this stage, hurt the Iranian people. The American proposal will include a prohibition on the Iranian leadership from traveling outside their country, and a freezing of Iranian leadership's assets outside of Iran. This comes on the heels of attempted sanctions on Iraq, which hurt the Iranian people, but not Saddam Hussein.

Bolton sounded optimistic in his interview saying that Russia and China will agree to impose sanctions after they see the suggested version. Bolton clarified that if Russia and China don't agree to sanctions in the Security Council, American diplomacy is already in action to achieve sanctions outside the framework of the UN.

The Los Angeles Times writes that according to US terrorism laws, the US can impose its own sanctions on Iran, and can, for instance, stop ships carrying missiles and material connected to nuclear production on their way to Iran.

"You don't need Security Council authority to impose sanctions, just as we have," Bolton said. "We will continue to enhance Proliferation Security Initiatives to cut off flows of materials and technology that are useful to Iran's ballistic missile program and nuclear programs. We will be constraining financial transactions under existing terrorism laws."

Bolton clarified in the interview that the US would focus efforts to pressure Japanese and European banks to stop doing business with Iran. This is a hint that the US Treasury Department is holding talks with other countries, which Bolton refused to identify. The Treasury Department reported that they are already seeing the fruits of this effort, including a decision by Switzerland's Union Bank to cut off relations with Iran.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ahmadinejad; bolton; iran; nuclear; sanctions; tehran; treasury; un; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
John Bolton, the best man at the right time in the UN.
1 posted on 08/26/2006 12:54:05 PM PDT by M. Espinola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

You can say that again. We need him.


2 posted on 08/26/2006 12:55:59 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

Ditto!


3 posted on 08/26/2006 12:57:02 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

I think we should send Iran some weapons!


4 posted on 08/26/2006 12:57:50 PM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

How is it independent when Japan, Germany, France and Britain are involved?


5 posted on 08/26/2006 12:58:45 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

Oh no! Independent sanctions!

The Ayatollahs are shaking in their turbans.

Independent airstrikes, well, that's a different story.


6 posted on 08/26/2006 12:59:48 PM PDT by JHBowden (Speaking truth to moonbat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola
Since sanctions worked so we in iraq, we should all get ready for all the glorious successes we are going to have with sanctions on iran......
WTF....without sanctions saddam would never have been found in that spider hole.
7 posted on 08/26/2006 1:03:09 PM PDT by no-to-illegals ( 'no' always causes a mad rush to counter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola
sanctions outside of the framework of the UN

I hope this is code for something else.

8 posted on 08/26/2006 1:03:51 PM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ndt

The title is misleading. The article says the President will build an independent coalition. (independent of the un and the other enemies to freedom.)


9 posted on 08/26/2006 1:05:05 PM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola
my goodness, it is another peace in our time moment....
leave me alone, I want to enjoy it...the moment....
10 posted on 08/26/2006 1:05:11 PM PDT by no-to-illegals ( 'no' always causes a mad rush to counter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
"The title is misleading."

Totally, the article is pretty clear but that headline is pushing the bounds.
11 posted on 08/26/2006 1:07:24 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden

Oil exporting sanctions so not one drop of either Iranian crude or natural gas exits the Persian Gulf via supertankers - then full scale air attacks to bring the jihad-exporting-régime to its knees.


12 posted on 08/26/2006 1:08:19 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

I thought we already had sanctions ... since, 1979?


13 posted on 08/26/2006 1:09:13 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

don't know that....but it been a long period of time that sanctions have been in place by us on iran.


14 posted on 08/26/2006 1:10:29 PM PDT by no-to-illegals ( 'no' always causes a mad rush to counter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

"The US believes that Japan and the European trio - Germany, France, and Britain – will provide the base for international rallying outside the Security Council in the case that Russia and China block the sanctions."

France? Maybe the US also believes in Santa Claus... Ignore the French, they have not missed an opportunity to stab Bush in the back, so why are they even bothering with these a*holes.


15 posted on 08/26/2006 1:11:51 PM PDT by observer5 (It's not a War on Terror - it's a WAR ON STUPIDITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ndt

Hello, would you have read this if the title was sprinkled with peace and love? I think it's called a "TEASER" to get you interested in reading the rest of the story. It's kind of like advertising. Just my 2 cents.


16 posted on 08/26/2006 1:12:53 PM PDT by VastRWCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo
"I think we should send Iran some weapons!"

I agree.


17 posted on 08/26/2006 1:14:11 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VastRWCon
"Hello, would you have read this if the title was sprinkled with peace and love?"

Strange, generally misleading headlines are derided as biased here. My first thought was "duh, we already did that".
18 posted on 08/26/2006 1:15:51 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: shield
"I thought we already had sanctions ... since, 1979?"

That is correct, except these will be effective. OPEC's Iran only has one main source of revenue to export jihadic terrorism, and that is exportable Iranian energy products. It high time the mullah dictatorship is over barrel.

19 posted on 08/26/2006 1:17:25 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola

How about some bunker-buster sanctions?


20 posted on 08/26/2006 1:18:22 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson