Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy for president?
Townhall.com ^ | 7/8/06 | Robert Novak

Posted on 07/08/2006 8:12:30 AM PDT by mathprof

Well-connected public figures report that they have been told recently by Rudolph Giuliani that, as of now, he intends to run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008.

The former mayor of New York was on top of last month's national Gallup poll measuring presidential preferences by registered Republicans, with 29 percent. Sen. John McCain's 24 percent was second, with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich third at 8 percent. National polls all year have shown Giuliani running either first or second to McCain, with the rest of the presidential possibilities far behind.

Republican insiders respond to these numbers by saying rank-and-file GOP voters will abandon Giuliani once they realize his position on abortion, gay rights and gun control. Party strategists calculate that if he actually runs, he must change on at least one of these issues.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008; demslovehim; electionpresident; friendofharding; friendofkerick; giuliani; giuliani2008; giuliani4dogcatcher; novak; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 521-533 next last
To: Alberta's Child

What a remarkably stupid argument.

Maybe you don't like the system of Government but it is what it is.

The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. Sometimes badly.

And the Congress often pass bad law.

And the President something makes really stupid decisions.

But that's, checks and balances and warts and all, is the Government of the United States.

I'm sorry it doesn't meet with your approval. You can stay in bed.


361 posted on 07/08/2006 2:52:17 PM PDT by Sabramerican (Rice is Harriet Miers at State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

There is something pathological about your view of NYC.


362 posted on 07/08/2006 2:52:33 PM PDT by Sabramerican (Rice is Harriet Miers at State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

I don't know either. And frankly, don't care.


363 posted on 07/08/2006 2:53:10 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

Sorry for the double.


364 posted on 07/08/2006 2:53:41 PM PDT by Sabramerican (Rice is Harriet Miers at State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

What a remarkably stupid argument.

Maybe you don't like the system of Government but it is what it is.

The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. Sometimes badly.

And the Congress often pass bad law.

And the President something makes really stupid decisions.

But that, checks and balances and warts and all, is the Government of the United States.

I'm sorry it doesn't meet with your approval. You can stay in bed.


365 posted on 07/08/2006 2:55:26 PM PDT by Sabramerican (Rice is Harriet Miers at State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Rudy or McPain becomes the candidate and I leave the party!

No point in electing a RINO, actually worse than a liberal.
With a RINO in office we would be expected to bless his actions under the guise of "Party Unity".

At least with a Dumb-ocrat in office we would be free to resist them by all legal means.


366 posted on 07/08/2006 2:55:34 PM PDT by Richard-SIA ("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

If he truly cares about this country he would share the truths about McCain, not try to prop him up.


367 posted on 07/08/2006 2:57:37 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
There is something pathological about your view of NYC.

Maybe it's because there's something pathological about New York City.

368 posted on 07/08/2006 2:57:54 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: no dems

"I would never vote for a man who divorced his wife, while she was dying of cancer, to marry his younger, little ho."

And then divorced HER (Marianne), for a third, even younger model (Calista).


369 posted on 07/08/2006 2:58:16 PM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

What a remarkably stupid argument.

Maybe you don't like the system of Government but it is what it is.

The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. Sometimes badly.

And the Congress often pass bad law.

And the President something makes really stupid decisions.

But that, checks and balances and warts and all, is the Constitutionally formed Government of the United States.

I'm sorry it doesn't meet with your approval. You can stay in bed.


370 posted on 07/08/2006 2:59:34 PM PDT by Sabramerican (Rice is Harriet Miers at State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
It's easy to forget that we live in a country that owes its very existence to a bunch of people who toppled their government just because they thought the taxes were too high.

I guess it's also easy to forget that the book Great Accomplishments by Moderates in American History hasn't even been written yet.

371 posted on 07/08/2006 2:59:36 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
No, it's not.

Yes, the notion that "most Americans recognize that for all intents and purposes, New York City isn't even really part of the United States anymore" is nonsense. The argument that NYC has capitulated on issues that Americans consider very important (save for money I suspect) could apply to most metropolitan cities (LA, Chicago, Houston,...). And, if so, those cities are also no longer part of the United States, which is nonsense. You may not like these cities but they are very much a part of this country and are worth fighting to keep.

372 posted on 07/08/2006 2:59:57 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: marajade

Just wondered, since you gave him a "pass" on when he started dating Judy Nathan.


373 posted on 07/08/2006 3:01:45 PM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
The Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. Sometimes badly.

The point is what was interpreted once can be re-interpreted, and is best when done by a conservative court.

374 posted on 07/08/2006 3:04:01 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

"A nation that kills a million of its own children every year and then allows a million illegal immigrants to invade the country in the same year doesn't need "immigration reform" -- it needs a f#cking psychiatric examination from top to bottom."

No argument here.


375 posted on 07/08/2006 3:06:01 PM PDT by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Remember how popular this Pennsylvania ad campaign was? LOL.


376 posted on 07/08/2006 3:08:58 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: marajade

I agree the source is a hit piece. Even the Observer says it was created by Republicans who want to "kneecap" Rudy.

They are malcontents.


377 posted on 07/08/2006 3:09:32 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: jla
OUCH!
That's going to leave a mark on the Guiliani trolls. Good job.
378 posted on 07/08/2006 3:10:35 PM PDT by metalurgist (Believe in my God or I will kill you! The cry of all religious extremists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Perhaps that campaign was before my time. I moved to SNJ from Houston 4 years ago.


379 posted on 07/08/2006 3:25:08 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; Sabramerican

My wife just sounded the dinner bell! It was a pleasure talking with you both.

Good night.


380 posted on 07/08/2006 3:29:48 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 521-533 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson