Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Successfully Fires Multiple-warhead Missile
Associated Press ^

Posted on 03/31/2006 11:42:18 AM PST by Conservative Canuck

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran successfully test-fired a missile that can avoid radar and hit several targets simultaneously using multiple warheads, the military said Friday.

Gen. Hossein Salami, the air force chief of the elite Revolutionary Guards, did not specify the missile's range, saying it depends on the weight of its warheads. But state-run television described the weapon as "ballistic," suggesting it's of comparable range to Iran's existing ballistic rocket, which can travel 2,000 kilometres and reach arch-foe Israel and U.S. bases in the Middle East.

"Today, a remarkable goal of the Islamic Republic of Iran's defence forces was realized with the successful test-firing of a new missile with greater technical and tactical capabilities than those previously produced," Salami said on state-run television.

It showed a clip of the launch of what it called the Fajr-3, with "fajr" meaning "victory" in Farsi.

"It can avoid anti-missile missiles and strike the target," Salami said. He said the missile would carry a multiple warhead, and each warhead would be capable of hitting its target precisely.

"This news causes much concern, and that concern is shared by many countries in the international community, about Iran's aggressive nuclear weapons program and her parallel efforts to develop delivery systems, both in the field of ballistic missiles and cruise missiles," said Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnews.canoe.ca ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; iran; irannukes; missiles; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Conservative Canuck

Tuned in Fox last night, Brit Hume's show. The Allstars were in agreement that it'd be tough for GW to bomb Iran's nukes without getting permission from congress...because of the uproar over bad intelligence and missing WMD's in Iraq...we all know the WMD's were sent to Syria, but dems don't want to talk about that. They'd prefer to impeach GW. So, the consensus is that GW will let Israel do the bombing. Since we control Iraqi airspace, they can fly over Jordan and Iraq, no problem. We'll still take heat from the rest of the world, but not as much as if we bombed Iran, ourselves.


21 posted on 03/31/2006 11:59:39 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck

But the muslim leading the IAEA says there is no proof Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons. He said sanctions would prevent his group from further investigations into these allegations.


22 posted on 03/31/2006 12:01:04 PM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck; All
Is Russian military expert Anatoly Tsiganok at all concerned with this news? /sarc

Russian expert says U.S. test explosion is "political" move

23 posted on 03/31/2006 12:02:25 PM PST by balk (Vive le Canada libre... des Libereaux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck

I am very glad that El-Baradei decided to call for toning down the speech to Iran. It's obvious there is no need for any strong language or anything....


24 posted on 03/31/2006 12:03:23 PM PST by Personal Responsibility (Amnesia is a train of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rock_lobsta
So, anyone care to figure out why the bombing hasn't started five minutes ago?

Well, I think it's safe to assume we know a lot more about the Iranian test than they think we do. We knew about it when it happened, and probably before. Thus we probably had a variety of assets in place to monitor and assess the performance of the missile.

I rather suspect that it's not nearly so "radar transparent" as claimed -- though perhaps they think it is; in which case, it's good to let them think they're invisible when they're really not.

Finally, this was just a test. The mullahs may well declare success ... but I'll bet it wasn't as successful as they claimed. It's media spin.

25 posted on 03/31/2006 12:04:23 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hershey

I saw it, too. I don't think it could be done from the air alone, even with the new 'bunker-busters'(trust me, I know ;-), but they could play a big part in any coordinated ground/air strike.

It wouldn't take much for a right turn from Iraq of a battalion or two to go in on the ground. As far a Congress goes, are you familiar with the term 'Clear and Present Danger?' :-)


26 posted on 03/31/2006 12:06:18 PM PST by Conservative Canuck (The Voice of One Crying in the Wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck
Truly chilling stuff.
It is truly chilling. I am by no means minimizing the threat.
My point was that more than likely it doesn't fulfill all the capabilities lister, OR it has another flaw or they wouldn't be advertising its capabilities.
We (the US) have no chance of preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons. We gave the technology that allows targets to be hit to China and China doesn't care who it sells to.

Cordially,
GE
27 posted on 03/31/2006 12:06:22 PM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck
"It can avoid anti-missile missiles and strike the target,"
Oh really?
28 posted on 03/31/2006 12:06:32 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

If they really do have MIRV technology, we can trace it directly to the activities of one man.


29 posted on 03/31/2006 12:08:43 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Good point! I'm certain Allah disapproves of the 13th century mindset and actions of the Iranians and their cohorts.


30 posted on 03/31/2006 12:13:07 PM PST by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hershey
the consensus is that GW will let Israel do the bombing.
I have no doubt that Israel will not allow this kind of threat to just sit. However, if they do the bombing, all hell will break loose in the middle east - you can count on it.
Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, probably Russia, Turkey may even turn on US.
Those Arab states that are barely able to contain the Muslim hatred of us will no longer be able to contain it and stay in control of their government.
I believe that the last thing on earth we want is for our friend, Israel to bomb them.

Just my opinion.....
GE
31 posted on 03/31/2006 12:16:21 PM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
So, anyone care to figure out why the bombing hasn't started five minutes ago?

China and Russia benefit.

It is in the interest of China and Russia to see the USA get bogged down in Iraq. This is why they allowed the US to invade Iraq--they knew the USA would end up spending a $ Trillion dollars after all is said and done (we are half-way there already).

For every dollar we spend globe trotting the world and fighting in regional conflicts, China and Russia close the gap on us militarily. They spend their $$$ on R&D and producing advanced weapons, while we waste our military $$$ on repair and maintenance and replacement of old weapon systems.

N. Korea developed their missiles from China's help and from Russia's help. China has developed most of its military arms from Russia's help. Pakistan and N. Korea traded military know-how. All these nations have the same goal--weakening the USA empowers them. They are all a team. They all have a common goal--a weak America.

Re Iran, China and Russia know that a nuclear Iran and an Iran with capable missiles will cause the USA to get bogged down in missile defense and other major expenditures for Saudia Arabia and Israel. Again, more money taken away from the USA's defense and more closing of the gap while China and Russia spend their money on new advanced programs.

China and Russia don't want us to attack Iran now and will do everything including threaten us to prevent that. However, once Iran gains more military capability, and maybe a nuke, then China and Russia would LOVE to see us attack Iran (once Iran pays them their debts), so the USA would get bogged down in another conventional war and chew up another $1 Trillion.

China and Russia know what they are doing. Russia plays us like a fine Stradivarius. China and Russia work together because they know that they both gain whenever the USA's national treasury gets dumped in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, etc.

China and Russia use the USA's "go-gooder, globe-trotting police action and defender of democracy" agenda to weaken the USA and to close the gap and eventually supercede the USA in advanced weapon capability.

32 posted on 03/31/2006 12:17:48 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (The purpose of this forum is to fight socialism (see FR homepage), not to defend Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Ping


33 posted on 03/31/2006 12:17:55 PM PST by NY Attitude (You are responsible for your safety until the arrival of Law Enforcement Officers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
Oh really?
Yep, it's called "lets just say it will and it has to work".
back when I was a kid we called it lying; now it is called "marketing" and they teach it in college! LOL!

I hope they continue to believe it!
34 posted on 03/31/2006 12:20:15 PM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

China and Russia work together because they know that they both gain whenever the USA's national treasury gets dumped in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, etc.
-----
True it is. We need conservative leadership in the White House and the Congress to stop doing the stupid stuff (like supporting illegals and funding every world conflict). Too bad we don't have a President and Congress that is FOCUSED on the U.S. instead of every country outside our borders...that would help the issue greatly.


35 posted on 03/31/2006 12:22:13 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck

I call BS, Iran does not have MIRV tech. Thats like 25 years ahead of their time.

Iran celebrating April fools or something?


36 posted on 03/31/2006 12:23:37 PM PST by Crazieman (6-23-2005, Establishment of the United Socialist States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck

"...elite Revolutionary Guards..."

Oxymoron? Only the MSM would describe a bunch of Islamic thugs as "elite."


37 posted on 03/31/2006 12:25:28 PM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rock_lobsta

Don't know. I picked this week in the pool. If the predictions are right, Iran will test a nuke a week from tomorrow.


38 posted on 03/31/2006 12:26:13 PM PST by Flavius Josephus (War today is always cheaper than war tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

The UN seems to do a pretty good job of holding US back.


39 posted on 03/31/2006 12:27:27 PM PST by Flavius Josephus (War today is always cheaper than war tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Canuck

Two can play at that game. Loading ordinance..chest candy coming soon for everyone involved..


40 posted on 03/31/2006 12:28:04 PM PST by Windsong (Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson