Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Tragic Treatment of the UAE Ports Deal
StrategyPage ^ | February 24, 2006 | Harold C. Hutchison

Posted on 02/25/2006 3:00:55 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4

February 24, 2006: The recent controversy over the acquisition of the British firm Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company, by Dubai Ports World, a state-run company in the United Arab Emirates, has been largely a matter of heat opposed to light. This is largely because of a number of myths that have quickly circulated throughout the blogosphere. These myths have led to a lot of controversy that has cast one of the strongest American allies in the Persian Gulf in a poor light that is undeserved.

First, a look at the United Arab Emirates is in order. This is a country that has been a long-standing ally of the United States since 1971. The UAE was part of the coalition to liberate Kuwait in 1991, and also has supported the United States in the war on terror (including, among other things, providing access to a deep-water berth that can accommodate aircraft carriers, use of a training facility for air-to-air training facility, airfields, and logistics support). It is a country that has proven largely inhospitable to al-Qaeda (instead, the focus is on business), sent forces to Afghanistan to protect the construction of a hospital that they donated and built, and also has sent humanitarian assistance to Iraq while also providing a location for training Iraqi police. In 2002, the UAE also captured a major al-Qaeda figure, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who was involved in the attack on the USS Cole in 2000, and handed him over to the United States despite threats from the terrorist organization. After Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005, the UAE donated $100 million for the relief efforts. Both Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and General Peter Pace have described the relationship the United States has with United Arab Emirates as "very close" and "superb". It would be interesting to know what sort of information Michelle Malkin has that would override the judgment of Rumsfeld and Pace. Her characterization of the United Arab Emirates as "demonstrably unreliable" is not just factually challenged, it is slap in the face to the strongest ally the United States has in the Persian Gulf.

One of the other things that has been ignored in the anti-UAE diatribes from Malkin is the fact that the United Arab Emirates is a Middle Eastern country where religious tolerance is the rule. The UAE's constitution guarantees freedom of religion (albeit it declares Islam as the official religion), and largely permits religious freedom. In 2003, the UAE shut down the Zayed Center for Coordination and Follow-up, which was publishing material that promoted anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.

Second, nothing will really change at the ports, particularly with regards to security. Security will remain the province of the United States Coast Guard and the Department of Homeland Security. In another fact ignored by the scare campaign, the UAE has the only port in the Middle East that is part of the Container Security Initiative. Dubai Ports World has also agreed to mandatory participation in other programs to improve security and to prevent the illegal shipment of nuclear materials, and will also provide documents on internal operations on demand and has agreed to cooperate in future investigations. The deal was also scrutinized by the intelligence community, which found no problems. The only thing that changes hands is who owns the company that will handle the day-to-day operations (often performed by American longshoremen – usually unionized). Dubai Ports World also bought out the port operations of CSX in 2004 – with no real issues.

Third, several claims have been made regarding connections to 9/11, specifically the fact that two of the hijackers were from the UAE. First, none of the critics have any proof that either the government of the UAE or Dubai Ports World was involved in the attack. By the standard of these critics, the United Kingdom would be held responsible for Richard Reid, or Germany would be responsible for the Hamburg cell that planned the attack. Second, the United Arab Emirates have stepped up efforts to make money laundering less easy after Dubai was used as a financial conduit for the attacks (again, there is no proof that the UAE or DPW were active participants in the laundering). It should also be noted that at least two Americans have worked with al-Qaeda (Johnny Walker Lindh and Jose Padilla) as well.

The last thing to consider is that in the day and age of the Internet, this debate is not staying inside the United States. Past irresponsible comments (like those by Senator Richard Durbin concerning Guantanamo Bay) have spread across the world very quickly. The scurrilous comments directed at the United Arab Emirates by Michelle Malkin have the potential to assist al-Qaeda recruiting in that country, and thus do more damage than the port deal would have done.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland; US: New Jersey; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: chineseexemtions; chineseshipbuilding; chung; ports; psa; riady; trustnoone; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 461-473 next last
To: Cannoneer No. 4

"And Dr. King is trustworthy and Tommy Franks is a traitor?"

I find Dr. King trustworthy until proven otherwise. Tommy Franks has some explaining to do. We have already been over this.


341 posted on 02/25/2006 4:28:11 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson; drhogan

"I noticed that your friend disappeared. He suddenly realized that DPW won't control any ports, as he thought/claimed, and is begging JR to let him change his vote."

It is considered a matter of courtesy here on FR to ping the poster you are attempting to defame, or referring to in any context.


342 posted on 02/25/2006 4:34:06 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner; CWOJackson
They're not so punctilious when they think they're winning, are they?
343 posted on 02/25/2006 4:40:40 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner; drhogan
Thanks.

So, drhogan, now that you have learned DPW will not be running any ports, but will only be managing a commercial business within the port, will you be changing your vote to support?

344 posted on 02/25/2006 4:44:04 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
General Franks said that it's absurd to chastise the UAE for their pre-911 ties to the Taliban. For if it were not for that, the US's precision bombing and rapid, successful military campaign would not have been possible. For it was the UAE gov't who handed him (personally, he said) much of the intel that led to the Afghan campaign's stellar performance. It is important to note that the UAE denounced the WTC attack, and broke ties with the Taliban after 911.
345 posted on 02/25/2006 4:45:42 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

And you would take the word of someone like...General Franks?


346 posted on 02/25/2006 4:47:09 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Better the taliban than them on America's terrorist radar.


347 posted on 02/25/2006 4:49:59 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Joseph King, a John Jay College professor and former counterterrorism chief of the Customs Bureau in New York

Former CENTCOM commanding general Tommy Franks

348 posted on 02/25/2006 4:55:41 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
“I’ll take Dubai over the mob any day,” said Mitchell Moss...

I loved that.

349 posted on 02/25/2006 4:59:21 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

Comment #350 Removed by Moderator

To: takenoprisoner
People who cannot discern an ally after 5 years of impressive support on their part from our enemies because of some cultural connections just don’t have the vision and perception to deal with this subject.
351 posted on 02/25/2006 5:06:19 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

Comment #352 Removed by Moderator

To: buffmonster
Why do you think nothing has happened YET?

The adults have been getting it done for over four years, without your input.

353 posted on 02/25/2006 5:17:09 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: buffmonster; CWOJackson; Cannoneer No. 4

When we repeat it enough, "the UAE are our friends" mantra, we can count on hundreds of thousands of mindnumb robots to begin to believe it true inspite of the mountains of evidence otherwise.

It's an age old tactic for the feeble minded.


354 posted on 02/25/2006 5:19:25 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: buffmonster
To win the War on Terror, we essentially have three options, none of them easy:

1. Kill everyone in the Middle East, except for Israel.

2. Pick a border and hide behind it, a la “Fortress America”.

3. Destroy enemies, make friends, and establish democracy

That’s it folks, you have to choose one of them.

355 posted on 02/25/2006 5:20:09 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

Comment #356 Removed by Moderator

To: takenoprisoner
Opposition to the sale is driven by ignorance and prejudice.
357 posted on 02/25/2006 5:23:13 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
"It's an age old tactic for the feeble minded."

Do you mean like trying to repeat a lie so many times (control the ports) that it becomes true?

What was that about black pots and kettles?

358 posted on 02/25/2006 5:24:43 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: buffmonster

359 posted on 02/25/2006 5:25:25 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

Comment #360 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 461-473 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson