To: ohioWfan; Admin Moderator
Or perhaps the deliberate agitation of the poster is not a problem, forum rule-wise. Can we get a ruling Admin Moderator?
177 posted on
02/24/2006 8:38:02 AM PST by
apackof2
(You can stand me up at the gates of hell, I'll stand my ground and I won't back down)
To: apackof2; ohioWfan; Admin Moderator
I second the request for a ruling from the chair. Should this thread be pulled and a thread begun for the purposes of discussion of Krauthammer's entire viewpoint?? Personal insults completely aside??
178 posted on
02/24/2006 8:45:36 AM PST by
txrangerette
("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
To: apackof2; Admin Moderator; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
A good idea. Perhaps I misunderstand what FR is about.
But I have always thought that a thread based on deliberate agitation of legitimate freepers was opposed to the purpose of the forum. And that clearly is the case here.
I'm not going to press it, but I am curious.
There has been legitimate debate here because of the fundamental decency of the freepers whom Kent derides, and in spite of Kent's goal and behavior, so perhaps the thread should stand.
179 posted on
02/24/2006 8:49:26 AM PST by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson