Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD:Senate vote to confirm Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court;(UPDATE: Alito Confirmed 58-42)
C-span

Posted on 01/31/2006 5:48:48 AM PST by ken5050

Edited on 01/31/2006 5:55:34 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

Good morning, all.

Join us today for the final victory lap, the vote to "confirm Samuel Alito, of New Jersey, to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court."

It's all over except the final vote tally.

Lots of surprises yesterday at the HUGE vote to impose cloture, so perhaps there are still some surprise votes to come?


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitovote; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 1,821 next last
To: DarthVader

Reid DOES know that to be minority leader doesn't mean he always has to be deeply saddened or troubled, doesn't he?


641 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:20 AM PST by small voice in the wilderness (Hillary/Obama Nation '08. Let The Desolation Begin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde

"executive power".He should ask clinton about Elian gonzales!


642 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:21 AM PST by dutch52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Oh my, that is good!


643 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:24 AM PST by kimmie7 (As of January 23, I've been smoke free 11 MONTHS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: gramho12
Why do the dems always mention "THE STRIP SEARCH OF A 10 YEAR OLD GIRL" like they're somehow telling everyone something new that no one knew?
644 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:25 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

Reid is saying about Alito decisions "Government wins, you lose."

Are the democrats now officially and openly anti-government? No wonder they do not believe in fair elections - the one man one vote kind.


645 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:26 AM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: kimmie7
Dingy lies continues . . .

"profound threats"
"I worry"
"disturbing views"

646 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:26 AM PST by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
The Searchlight is on, but no one is home.

Classic!

647 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:29 AM PST by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies]

To: madmominct
Ahh, poor old Harriet. All the fault of those big bad radical conservative bloggers - oops- that would be US!! Congratulations Freepers ...

Freepers agains Miers, aka "the dark side", were a distinct minority.

648 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:32 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 599 | View Replies]

Comment #649 Removed by Moderator

To: ChadGore

Anyone counting how many times Harry is using the word "distrubing"? Could be a freakin' drinkin' game at this point...


650 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:36 AM PST by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

The Dems sure like talking about strip-searching 10yo girls.
651 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:44 AM PST by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: defconw
Dingy must really have a thing for Harriet!

Well,

Democrats on the the Senate Judiciary Committee reacted cautiously to Miers' nomination, but they did not immediately oppose it.

In a written statement Leahy said, "It is too early to reach any firm judgment about such an important nomination," noting Miers long ties to President Bush. "It is important to know whether she would enter this key post with the judicial independence necessary when the Supreme Court considers isues of interest to this Administration."

"My first reaction is a simple one: It could have been a lot worst," Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, one of the Demcrats on the committee, said. "... The president has not sent us a nominee that we've rejected already."

Schumer continued, "There's hope that Harriet Miers is a mainstream nominee. ... Given the fact that the extreme wing of the president's party was demanding someone of fealty to their views, this is a good first day in the process that begins to fill the seat of Sandra Day O'Connor."

Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, another Democratic committee member and its only woman, said she was happy that a woman was nominated to replace the outgoing O'Connor but wanted to know more about Miers' views on privacy and other issues.

"This new justice will be critical in the balance with respect to rulings on congressional authority, as well as a woman's right to privacy, environmental protections, and many other aspects of constitutional law in the United States," Feinstein said.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, was complimentary of Miers. He raised Miers' name during a September 22 breakfast meeting with the president in which Sens. Frist, Specter, Leahy and he discussed possible candidates with the president, Reid spokeman Jim Manley said. Reid believes Miers would bring a "fresh perspective" to the court, Manley said.

"I like Harriet Miers," Reid said in a statement. "As White House counsel, she has worked with me in a courteous and professional manner. I am also impressed with the fact that she was a trailblazer for women as managing partner of a major Dallas law firm and as the first woman president of the Texas Bar Association."

652 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:51 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Wrong is wrong even if everybody is doing it; Right is right even if no one does it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde

I know.....we should make a list of the buzzwords, or have we done that already?

imperialistic presidency is one!

shooting a boy in the back

and my personal favorite --

finding out what you read at the library


653 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:53 AM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary
Harry just brought up the fleeing african american boy who was shot......Yeah and that probably saved many robber's lives.

Tells you right quick to not run from a Memphis policeman. I lived there for 15 years and robbery was rampant.

654 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:53 AM PST by Chuck54 (Alito Battle - Liberals expected Armageddon & got Dunkirk. (C. Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Landrieu and Rockefeller are the only two "undeclared".

rolling eyes...

655 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:54 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Congratulations Justice Alito. Suck eggs, RATS. Bwahahaha!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54

Reid is a hick and should really be back in the barn with a pitchfork rather than reading a canned speech from his more-educated staff.


656 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:55 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

to play to their base in efforts to raise funds......

Dean spent it all.....

we need to pay them for campaigning appearantly.....


657 posted on 01/31/2006 7:52:55 AM PST by eeevil conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown

Is Reid actually suggesting that Alito will somehow ban birth control?


658 posted on 01/31/2006 7:53:02 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
Can the moderator remove the picture?

They've already done that. Now only if they could clean up C-SPAM2 and get Dingy Harry off of there,....

659 posted on 01/31/2006 7:53:10 AM PST by steveegg (Take two - throw those long knives at the DemonRATs and lieberals - and include the RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: All

What the heck? Chafee is voting no? WHY????


660 posted on 01/31/2006 7:53:16 AM PST by Halls (Dallas County, Texas, but my heart is in East Texas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 1,821 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson