The title of the topic pertains to 135,000 year old tool evidence. Archaic Homo Sapiens was around before that, and the oldest transitional form is something like 160,000 years. 25,000 years (give or take older transitional specimens not yet found) is a great plenty.
If you're arguing that Replacement is the only correct view, then I'll say that you are dead wrong.
No, that's not my argument. My only assumptions are set forth in my posts herein. Having said that, its hard to imagine even archaic Homo Sapiens in Southern California 200,000 years ago. My questions are the same as with other Homo forms.
An interesting discussion. Thanks for the post.