[ClearCase_guy]

The ignorance I showed in post #6 is inexcuable. It's true I haven't studied. I repeat my post below to demonstrate the depths of my stupidity:

That the footprints are 165 million years old.
This footprints went from land into water.
This dinosaur was 6 feet tall.
This dinosaur ate meat.
This dinosaur is an ancester of birds.
This dinosaur was born on a Tuesday.

Every statements above are ludicrous and could only be made by someone who is ignorant of science.

[kjam22]

The really stupid statement is when he says "all 3 toed dinosaures to date were carnivores"... and then he talks about forensic science.....

[Senator Bedfellow]

Every statements above are ludicrous and could only be made by someone who is ignorant of science.

Might as well toss in "grammatically challenged". As has been pointed out already, the first few statements can quite readily be inferred from the evidence. The last two are simply your own invention and really don't fit in with the rest, unless the purpose of such a post is to compare and contrast someone else's knowledge and insight with your own...well, whatever it is.

[Junior]

Your last two list items were ignorant. The real capper, however, was this:

I'm not just guessing here. This is all testable and verifiable. I may be mad, but I am a scientist.

Now, if you knew anything about science, as I pointed out earlier, you would know how the researchers arrived at their conclusions, which makes your last two list items and your concluding statement look ignorant in the extreme. Nice try, though, trying to get your two ignorant conclusions lumped in with the well-founded conclusions drawn by the researchers and then claiming the entire thing was ignorant.