[kjam22]

Science's problem is this..... it can't really prove much about what happend 50,000 years ago. It has a lot of ideas. But a jury wouldn't buy much of it as fact. Because it's just ideas. Informed ideas, but still ideas. It's just short on facts in a lot of areas.

But yet scientists who need that endowment each year just get torqued when people don't buy everything that they want to pass along. At least that's my opinion.

[VadeRetro]

Pig-ignorant yahoo-ism's problem is this... it is conducted by pig-ignorant yahoos whose arguments only raise one question: how much of what they say is willful dishonesty and how much sincere but abysmal pig-ignorance?

[Junior]

But a jury wouldn't buy much of it as fact.

The O.J. jury perhaps. Or are you one of those folks who think forensic science is just so much guesswork?