Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Preserving modesty in the pool (Muslim women in Seattle)
Seattle Times ^ | July 19, 2005 | Lornet Turnbull

Posted on 07/19/2005 1:03:41 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 541-543 next last
To: Mrs. Don-o

WHy is it that when Baptists have a religious objection to mixed swimming, it's stupid, but when Muslims do the same thing, it is celebrated?

(I know, not many Baptists feel this way today. But 20 years ago, things were different.)


301 posted on 07/20/2005 9:11:47 AM PDT by Sensei Ern (Christian, Comedian, Husband,Opa, Dog Owner, former Cat Co-dweller, and all around good guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe
Women with generous bosoms can't afford to burn their bras!

Have you seen the price on those things?! I'd go broke! LOL.

ROFLOL! When I read your first post to me, that is what I thought immediately..I was around during the bra-burning period. I can remember wondering why the bra burners were actually wearing them in the first place!

It proved to me that when you have nothing to lose..it's easy to be an activists!

302 posted on 07/20/2005 9:15:52 AM PDT by Iron Matron (Illegals should be Caught and Deported; not Released and Supported!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Sensei Ern
You wrote: "Why is it that when Baptists have a religious objection to mixed swimming, it's stupid, but when Muslims do the same thing, it is celebrated?"

I don't know this for a fact, but I would imagine that the same people who think it's stupid for Baptists, think it's stupid for Muslims. And the same people who take a different-strokes, live-and-let-live, attitude toward Baptists, take it toward privacy-seeking Muslim mamas, too.

And then there are those who come down to the poolside and want to fight about EVERY-freepin-thing...

303 posted on 07/20/2005 10:08:33 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Bobbling... boggling ... oh heck, bring on the pie and root beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: dervish
The only sentence on payment is this, and it does not read like a private rental of a facility at all...

You scratched the surface of what is available at the Seattle Parks and Recreation site posting what amounts to facts that support a conveniently incomplete picture of what is going on. Why is that?

Look at FACILITY RENTAL GUIDE Reservations & Payment:

Look at FACILITY RENTAL GUIDE Rules & Regulations:

Look at 2005-2006 FEES & CHARGES Athletic Facility Rentals Swimming Pools:


304 posted on 07/20/2005 10:26:38 AM PDT by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
In my opinion, this is rather nice, actually.

then I guess you think segeragation of the pools back in the 60's was "rather nice" too

305 posted on 07/20/2005 10:29:40 AM PDT by Tiger Smack (www.tigersmack.com <------- for LSU & SEC sports/news/stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tiger Smack; delacoert; Tax-chick
No, legal segregation --- by this I mean, segregation of public facilities, required by law -- is unjust.

Voluntary segregation (an Italian-American parade, a Black Student's Association, a women-only counseling group, a homeschoolers-only forensics meet, a men-only single-malt Scotch Whiskey club, a Muslim mama swim session) is an aspect of our First Amendment freedom of association.

In America, we believe we have the right to associate with (and that includes the right NOT to associate with) anyone we choose.

Freedom for all, and that includes you. Welcome to the USA!

306 posted on 07/20/2005 10:38:18 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Liberty. A beautiful concept..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
You think it's rather nice to be completely segregated?!

It would be great. Then I could go swimming, lose weight, get in shape, etc. without the jokes & stares from men just because I'm not perfect.

307 posted on 07/20/2005 10:40:39 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

Yes, you are correct. I actually saw the fees and they were so low I recognized that they must be subsidized and sought affirmation.

I live in NYC. Almost all public pools have been shut beacause of liability costs so I have some idea of the actual costs incurred by public swimming pools.

Basically the info you provided shows many rules were broken to accomodate a religious group of Muslim women. Where's the ACLU when you really need them?

Many of the rules are based on safety concerns so bending them also raises public policy concerns and increased liability issues. How safe is it to swim in a Burka?


308 posted on 07/20/2005 10:45:37 AM PDT by dervish (freedom is a long distance race)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Voluntary segregation (an Italian-American parade, a Black Student's Association, a women-only counseling group, a homeschoolers-only forensics meet, a men-only single-malt Scotch Whiskey club, a Muslim mama swim session) is an aspect of our First Amendment freedom of association.

Exactly.

What is it about the posters that refuse to see that renting a public facility for private use is PRIVATE USE.

You can rent a municipal skating rink for private use. You can reserve a picnic pavilion at a public park for private use. You can even rent the local Colosseum for private use. That rental allows the restriction to the people the renter chooses. It's allowed under policies instituted by the facility management (set under public policy). If the renter abides by the agreed to terms in the rental agreement, then there's no legal problems.

What the griping posters want is public policy that bans Muslims. While I agree with the real risks that Isolamofacists groups pose to the security of the USA, the pool rental scenario doesn't address that problem at all.

Solving lax immigration policies is surely necessary. Securing the border is essential. Effective monitoring terrorists activities in Mosques is absolutely necessary. Allowing racial profiling at airports is a good idea from a practical stand point.

Banning swimming pool rentals by Muslim women and children is just ridiculous.

309 posted on 07/20/2005 11:02:50 AM PDT by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: dervish
Basically the info you provided shows many rules were broken to accomodate a religious group of Muslim women. Where's the ACLU when you really need them?

I'm sorry, I just don't see that (maybe you have more information)

What rules were broken?

310 posted on 07/20/2005 11:09:23 AM PDT by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: dervish; delacoert
You wrote: "Basically the info you provided shows many rules were broken..."

Alas, my old eyes. I missed that. Could you list a few of the "many" listed rules that were broken?

311 posted on 07/20/2005 11:12:22 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Liberty. A beautiful concept..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: delacoert; Mrs. Don-o

My post #263 clearly reveals, directly from the Parks Dept, that these are not Rentals but User fees that only partially cover costs which are then subsidized by the Government.

This was no private rental. Merely private use.


312 posted on 07/20/2005 11:55:03 AM PDT by dervish (freedom is a long distance race)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Anyone who is unhappy should write the Parks Department and suggest that they raise the user fees to fully cover the cost of private use. Of course, if the users are local taxpayers, then they are paying some of the taxes that are partially subsidizing the cost of the facility use.

Rather complicated ... and best dealt with through the democratic process.


313 posted on 07/20/2005 12:04:12 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Democrats ... frolicking on the wilder shores of Planet Zongo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

" Bless your heart. You have a nice day."

Thanks, I generally do. :)

I love how Hillary says she, err I mean they (her pinko posse) are going to have to take things away from us (Christian) Americans while the rules are bent, changed and ignored in favor of the Christian hating, women hating radical islamo-fascists males. I bet muslim women don't dare "expose" one inch of skin pool side or beach side PROBABLY because we would see black and blue bruise marks all over their bodies from the honor beatings they "tolerate" (PC joke).


314 posted on 07/20/2005 12:10:54 PM PDT by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; delacoert; Tax-chick

"ANTI-DISCRIMINATION

We are committed to equal access and opportunity to our facilities for our citizens. Under federal, state and local (Seattle Municipal Code Section 18. 12.280) law, and in compliance with our own policies, we do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, political ideology, age, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, or presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability."


http://www.cityofseattle.net/parks/reservations/rentalguide/ada.htm

I am confident that there are rules about the appropriate dress for swimming within the pool. As I said this is a safety concern. I can not access the entirety of rules.


315 posted on 07/20/2005 12:11:55 PM PDT by dervish (freedom is a long distance race)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide

Please also see my post #263, #312, and #315. This was not a Private Rental merely a Private Use.

Rules do not apply to Muslims in PC la-la-land. Even violating the city's own descrimination rules is okay.


316 posted on 07/20/2005 12:17:42 PM PDT by dervish (freedom is a long distance race)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Wouldn't the chemicals used in the pool deal with any safety concerns you've got? IIRC, young children not toilet trained have been the cause of the disease outbreaks associated with pools/water parks in recent years, and those would be around all the time, or not at all, depending on the local regs.


317 posted on 07/20/2005 12:19:04 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Democrats ... frolicking on the wilder shores of Planet Zongo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

So when my tax dollars go to their Madrassas on the theory that they also pay local taxes that will be okay too?


318 posted on 07/20/2005 12:20:07 PM PDT by dervish (freedom is a long distance race)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: dervish

"Rules do not apply to Muslims in PC la-la-land. Even violating the city's own descrimination rules is okay."

Of course mass confusion, chaos and reverse discrimination is okay when the communist anarchy manifesto is doing it.
How else are they going to intimidate Christian Americans into a silent, obedient majority.


319 posted on 07/20/2005 12:21:03 PM PDT by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Your local school district provides vouchers for private school use, including religious schools? That's a very unusual situation; where do you live?


320 posted on 07/20/2005 12:22:55 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Democrats ... frolicking on the wilder shores of Planet Zongo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 541-543 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson