Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blame Bush not Liberals
World Net Daily (E-Mail to the Editor) ^ | 06/28/05 | Donna L. Halper

Posted on 06/28/2005 4:21:25 PM PDT by Desron13

Blame Bush, not liberals --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My friend Joseph Farah is 100 percent right that the Supreme Court ruling against homeowners and their property is an outrage. But as I read on the WND website the usual accusations about "activist judges" and "liberals," I wonder if conservatives could just step back for a second and look at what has really happened.

It seems to me this ruling is more an example of pandering to big business, rather than an example of liberal philosophy. Most liberals I know are quite opposed to the takeover of so much of our life by giant and impersonal conglomerates, and object to how these corporations make it impossible for family-run businesses to compete.

Many of you have turned "liberals" into the convenient scapegoats for everything, but you can lay this one at the feet of the Bush administration. There has not been a more corporation-friendly president in years. The results are frightening if you are an average working person: It's harder to file for bankruptcy, credit-card interest can go as high as 30 percent with nothing you can do about it, gas prices continue to skyrocket, lobbyists have inordinate influence in writing our laws, and American jobs keep getting outsourced.

But readers of WND, instead of admitting that this president and the Republican-led Congress have made only rich people their top priority and ignored everyone else, continue to blame "activist judges and liberals." The mind boggles.

I fully expect to be disagreed with, and I'm ready. But before you tell me I'm wrong, please think about what I've said. Many of you love this president, and while we may never agree about that, please look at the policies that led to the disgraceful Supreme Court ruling – and liberals didn't do it. Greed did it, and isn't it shameful that we generate so little outrage about the selfishness and corruption of our political leaders – and not just our liberal political leaders.

Joseph Farah is right that the Supreme Court should be ashamed, but he is wrong to expect the Bush administration to do anything about it. Why would the president and the Congress disrupt their pattern of favoring big business at the expense of the rest of us?

Donna L. Halper


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blamebush; bsbyaliberal; completebaloney; dude; eminentdomain; fifthammendment; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Desron13

EVERYONE HERE IS MISSING THE POINT.

LIBERALS BELIEVE IN THE SOCIALIST AND COMMUNIST TENET THAT GOVERNMENT IS ALL POWERFUL...

A TRUE SOCIALIST WILL DO **ANYTHING** TO CREATE DIVISION AND DISSENTION WHILE EXPANDING GOVERNMENT POWER...

DIVISION AND INTERNAL WARFARE IS **CLASSIC** MARXISM... EXPANDING GOVERNMENT POWER IS **CLASSIC** SOCIALISM AND COMMUNISM!@!!

Get a grip here... Stop buying into the liberal propaganda. They're doing anything they can to try to turn this one around because the public is FURIOUS at the liberal judges...

ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com


21 posted on 06/28/2005 4:30:22 PM PDT by woodb01 (ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok
"What motivated them (since we all know it's not the law or justice)?"

More likely Stalin than Bush.

22 posted on 06/28/2005 4:30:39 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
Bush is so bad he even corrupted the extreme liberals on the Supreme Court

You have to admit...that is a pretty good trick.

;-)

23 posted on 06/28/2005 4:31:07 PM PDT by SIDENET ("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
That's no way to talk about the probable Libertarian candidate for president in 2008:


24 posted on 06/28/2005 4:32:31 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: woodb01

You might not have noticed it, but none of us on this thread are buying this brain-dead drivel.


25 posted on 06/28/2005 4:32:33 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Desron13
While the statement "The truth can hurt and for once this lib makes some good points." can be true in this case its clearly not

The Supreme Court ruling split was clear...

The Court Liberals ruled against homeowners and their property and for gov. power...

And the Court Conservatives ruled for homeowners and their property rights against gov. power

...That just a fact

26 posted on 06/28/2005 4:32:33 PM PDT by tophat9000 (When the State ASSUMES death...It makes an ASH out of you and me..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog

It's only confusing when you try to force those "fact" things into the discussion. Baseless assertions are so much neater.


27 posted on 06/28/2005 4:35:25 PM PDT by Sofa King (MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
and he kills babies too....

Oh, that's not nearly evil enough. Bush must eat babies.

28 posted on 06/28/2005 4:35:54 PM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

Ms Halperin seems a bit unlear on the concept. The LIBERAL justices made this decision. Bush wants to appoint more CONSERVATIVE justices. Had there been more CONSERVATIVES the ruling may have gone differently. Yep, those libs are so much smarter than us dumb ole conservative Bush supporters!!

LOL


29 posted on 06/28/2005 4:36:17 PM PDT by Primetimedonna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

LOL

good point....

matter of fact, he also makes kids do drugs and encourages drunk drivers....


30 posted on 06/28/2005 4:37:02 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (Tancredo = Hillary Presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

And eats them, of course.


31 posted on 06/28/2005 4:37:16 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
I blame Bush for not turning the wind out of the WNW and also for not making it rain at night while keeping it sunny and comfortably warm all day.

GWB really has let us down, hasn't he?

I'm saddened.

Deeply, mind you.

LVM

32 posted on 06/28/2005 4:37:39 PM PDT by LasVegasMac ("God. Guts. Guns. I don't call 911." (bumper sticker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

The Supreme Court continually oscillates between being:

A Liberal Stronghold to being Puppets of the Bush Administration... and on the occasion that it upholds abortion rights, and other items on the liberal agenda, it is a bastion of freedom.


Depending of course on how liberals perceive the issues discussed, and ruled on.

There is little doubt that the Liberals actually control the Supreme Court by a slim majority... a very slim majority.


33 posted on 06/28/2005 4:37:45 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

LOL!!!!


34 posted on 06/28/2005 4:37:57 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

Ok folks, ENOUGH! I'm not blaming Bush for the decision. I am Blaming Bush and our Repub buddies in Congress for they're deafening silence. I voted for Bush but will never vote for another Repub again. Between the fiasco on the border and this atrocity just committed and allowed to stand by the socialist supremes, I've had enough! We put these people in power to advance our beliefs. It seems fairly obvious to me that most of them have their own agenda and it's not ours.


35 posted on 06/28/2005 4:38:41 PM PDT by Desron13 (The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. -Tom Clancy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

"but will never vote for another Repub again."

Hope you enjoy living in a country run by Hillary Clinton. Just keep putting your head in the sand when things don't go your way. Works everytime!


36 posted on 06/28/2005 4:41:13 PM PDT by Primetimedonna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

Fine if you are angry enougn about President Bush over the border fiasco and will never vote Repub again, you may do as you wish. This article, however, is pure hogwash.

BTW, maybe you'll get lucky and Hillary! will win the presidency. At least the borders will be controlled, huh?


37 posted on 06/28/2005 4:43:31 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (As long as Dean's the head of the D-N-C, it just looks better for the G-O-P!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Primetimedonna

Carefull we don't blame the republican party for it's own failures.


38 posted on 06/28/2005 4:44:20 PM PDT by cripplecreek (I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Are you serious??? We'll that's it!!! I was just barely in the approval column but now I hear that George W. is responsible for my lawn turning brown. That's it...I'm voting third party next time. There is no hope.

Sarcasm. Just in case it's not clear.

39 posted on 06/28/2005 4:46:42 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Desron13

She's chock full a somepin I can't say.

I believe this ruling is to support city, county and state employees.

These types have a strong vested interest in the tax revenues of any municipality, because it funds their above market salaries and retirements.

The 5 on the court are favoring them, not the corporations.

If the court really believed in "capitalism" and "free enterprise" it woulda told them to buy what land they can, at market prices, without interference by the citicrats.

Around my area, some of the "redevelopment" projects have been obvious failures, yet they continue.


40 posted on 06/28/2005 4:47:22 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson