Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giant space-time ripples may cause cosmic expansion
New Scientist (U.K.) ^ | March 18, 2005 | Maggie McKee

Posted on 03/19/2005 5:16:19 AM PST by snarks_when_bored

Giant space-time ripples may cause cosmic expansion
* 17:43 18 March 2005
* NewScientist.com news service
* Maggie McKee

Dark energy is not necessary to explain the accelerating expansion of the universe observed by astronomers, suggest controversial new calculations. Instead, gigantic ripples in space-time - larger than the observable universe - may be the cause.

Astronomers have known since the 1920s that space itself has been expanding since the big bang about 14 billion years ago. But in 1998, they discovered the expansion must have sped up about a billion years ago, based on observations of supernovae that appeared farther away than expected.

So cosmologists came up with several exotic explanations, including dark energy - which may be a repulsive property of space itself or an ultra-light particle - and a theory in which gravity behaves differently over large distances.

But current theories overestimate the effect of dark energy by millions of times, and modifying gravity is an "ad hoc" solution, says Antonio Riotto, a cosmologist at the National Institute for Research in Nuclear Physics in Padova, Italy. "There is a big embarrassment about what theory predicts and what we observe," he told New Scientist.

Now, he and a team led by Edward Kolb of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, US, say they can account for the cosmic speed-up using "inflation" - the widely-accepted theory that describes what happened in the first 10-35 seconds after the big bang. "Our proposal is very conservative - it doesn't invoke any new ingredient to explain the acceleration," Riotto says.

Global universe

During inflation, space itself expanded faster than the speed of light. As it did so, random quantum fluctuations that popped into being produced ripples in space-time. These swelled to fill the entire "global" universe, which is about 10100 times as large as the universe we can see.

Our "observable" universe is confined to a region with a radius of 14 billion light years because only light from within that distance has had time to reach us since the big bang.

The team believes the ripples had little effect on our observable universe for billions of years because the effect of nearby matter overpowered the far-distant ripples. But about a billion years ago, they say, the density of nearby matter became so reduced by the expansion of space that the effect of the ripples began to be felt - as cosmic acceleration.

Kolb explains that the ripples should affect the observable universe because they flowed through all of space during inflation, leaving behind a gravitational wake that can still be felt, if not seen, nearby. "Imagine you're out on the ocean, and it's foggy. You can be affected by very long-wavelength ripples, although you don't actually see the wave - all you feel is the swell moving up and down," he told New Scientist. He adds the ripples are growing with time - which causes the acceleration.

"Tricky" calculations

"I like this idea a lot," says Robert Brandenberger, a cosmologist at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, who predicted a similar effect in 1998. "We are sitting in the trough of a very long-wavelength density wave, which generates something that looks to us like acceleration," he told New Scientist.

But many researchers are not convinced. Sean Carroll, a cosmologist at the University of Chicago, US, says, "I don't really understand what they're doing. But they do have a track record of doing great things in cosmology."

Alan Guth, a cosmologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, US, who pioneered the theory of inflation in the 1980s, also acknowledges the team's record, but is nevertheless "fairly sceptical of the physics this paper is trying to use".

The calculations - which are based on Einstein's General Theory of Relativity - are "very tricky", he says. "As I understand it, when the wavelength of the perturbations gets longer and longer, the effects disappear completely - the ripples would have no effect on the observable universe."

Kolb's team says more observations of supernovae could provide a test of their theory, which predicts how strong the ripples should be. But Guth says it will be "very difficult to make the measurements accurately enough to distinguish this theory from other theories".

The paper has been submitted to Physical Review Letters.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cosmicinflation; cosmology; darkenergy; physics; spacetimeripples
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Maybe accelerating cosmic expansion is caused by space-time ripples rather than dark energy, as Riotto, Kolb and their team suggest, or maybe not. But, either way, it's not always appreciated that inflationary cosmology predicts that our visible universe is just a mere speck in a vastly larger 'global' universe:

During inflation, space itself expanded faster than the speed of light. As it did so, random quantum fluctuations that popped into being produced ripples in space-time. These swelled to fill the entire "global" universe, which is about 10100 times as large as the universe we can see.

Our "observable" universe is confined to a region with a radius of 14 billion light years because only light from within that distance has had time to reach us since the big bang.

It's not easy to comprehend what scaling up 'small' quantities by a factor of 10100 does. Try it.

1 posted on 03/19/2005 5:16:22 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; PatrickHenry

Ping


2 posted on 03/19/2005 5:17:01 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Look for the headlines to scream Women and minorities affected most - President Bush to blame
3 posted on 03/19/2005 5:18:50 AM PST by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Links to a couple of "Powers of Ten" websites (but notice that they range over only 42 or so orders of magnitude, not 100):

Powers of Ten

A Question of Scale

4 posted on 03/19/2005 5:30:40 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Does anything exist in quantities as large as 10 to the 100th power? Are there even that many atoms in the observable universe?

A number like that makes my hair hurt.

5 posted on 03/19/2005 5:33:12 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
Does anything exist in quantities as large as 10 to the 100th power? Are there even that many atoms in the observable universe?

Nope. Last I heard, the total number of elementary particles in the observable universe is something on the order of 1080, give or take a few.

6 posted on 03/19/2005 5:37:42 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

I'm an engineer, but stuff like this makes my brain hurt.


7 posted on 03/19/2005 5:39:23 AM PST by zoso82t
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
"space itself expanded faster than the speed of light. As it did so, random quantum fluctuations that popped into being produced ripples in space-time."

Just as I thought...

8 posted on 03/19/2005 5:53:50 AM PST by johnandrhonda (have you hugged your banjo today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnandrhonda

Yeah, the idea was so obvious, you didn't even bother to write it up... (smile)


9 posted on 03/19/2005 5:55:53 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
random quantum fluctuations that popped into being

I burp once in a while and I almost never have any warning.

Maybe it was kind of like the sneeze in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy".

10 posted on 03/19/2005 6:17:03 AM PST by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
I'm glad to learn that the global universe is so much larger than the observable one. I was beginning to feel cramped.

"the ripples...flowed through all of space...leaving behind a gravitational wake that can still be felt"

No wonder I feel wobbly!

11 posted on 03/19/2005 6:17:07 AM PST by Savage Beast (There is nothing liberal about the Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Bump for later reading.


12 posted on 03/19/2005 6:21:07 AM PST by Nowhere Man (I hope you enjoyed your dinner, Terri Schiavo can't. B-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Here's a link to a pre-print of the paper by Edward W. Kolb, Sabino Matarrese, Alessio Notari, and Antonio Riotto:

"Primordial inflation explains why the universe is accelerating today" [Abstract, PDF]

13 posted on 03/19/2005 6:23:27 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
cosmic speed-up using "inflation"

We could ask Jimmah Carter to give us a synopsis in simpler terms.

14 posted on 03/19/2005 6:27:09 AM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

....Dark energy is not necessary to explain the accelerating expansion of the universe observed by astronomers, suggest controversial new calculations. Instead, gigantic ripples in space-time - larger than the observable universe - may be the cause....Does this explain the dark energy called Hillary?....


15 posted on 03/19/2005 6:41:35 AM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

...and her gigantic ripples???...


16 posted on 03/19/2005 6:42:52 AM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

The Nexus commeth!

17 posted on 03/19/2005 6:46:07 AM PST by Sarajevo (Sarajevo is the beginning of 20th century history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

-b-


18 posted on 03/19/2005 7:21:43 AM PST by rellimpank (urban dwellers don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

You are a Trekkie of the first order. Live long and prosper.


19 posted on 03/19/2005 7:30:00 AM PST by cpdiii (Oil Field Trash, Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, (OIL FIELD TRASH was fun))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Thanks for the ping. This is a different title, and a whole different article, but I'm pretty sure it's all about the same subject as in an earlier thread:
Was Einstein right when he said he was wrong?
20 posted on 03/19/2005 7:33:57 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson