Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anglicans Give Ultimatum To Pro-Gay Liberals
News Telegraph ^ | 2-25-2005 | Jonathan Petre

Posted on 02/25/2005 7:42:54 AM PST by Pendragon_6

The worldwide Anglican Church was heading towards schism last night as its leaders prepared to force out the pro-homosexual liberal Americans and Canadians.

In a move that will send shockwaves around the world, the primates of the 70 million-strong Church are expected to issue an ultimatum today demanding that the liberals "withdraw and consider their position".

The final communique is still being drawn up, but it is certain to represent a victory for the conservative majority who have demanded discipline for bishops who defy official Church policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: New Hampshire; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: anglican; ecusa; fallout; homosexualagenda; homosexualbishop; schism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2005 7:42:55 AM PST by Pendragon_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pendragon_6
I believe the statement of Pope John Paul condemning gay marriages as "evil" is (and is going to have) some profound and complacency-shaking effects throughout the religious leadership world.

It may be one of his best and lasting legacies.

Leni

2 posted on 02/25/2005 7:46:56 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
For God's sake, SPLIT the church. Libs go their way and conservatives the other... I wish that happens with the Catholic Church. When two groups of people are so opposite in their views, why screw around trying to find 'common ground' when there isn't any.

SPLIT! And many ex-(or disenfranchised) Catholics like me may consider joining you. :)
3 posted on 02/25/2005 7:56:34 AM PST by ElPatriota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pendragon_6

Way to go, Anglicans!

There is not and cannot be such a thing as gay marriage.


4 posted on 02/25/2005 8:04:12 AM PST by Malleus Dei ("Communists are just Democrats in a hurry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pendragon_6

"Americans and the Canadians made it clear at this week's meeting, they were highly unlikely to reverse their deeply held convictions."

Those Gay convictions are they are not what is in the Bible. These groups need to repent for not following God's Written Word.


5 posted on 02/25/2005 8:05:10 AM PST by Little_shoe ("For Sailor MEN in Battle fair since fighting days of old have earned the right.to the blue and gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pendragon_6

Hmmm. Looks like there are religious conservatives worldwide--not just in the red states.

I wonder if any of this penetrates the minds of the liberal churchmen who push these positions.


6 posted on 02/25/2005 8:16:40 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pendragon_6

The Anglican Provence of Christ the King broke away from the Episcopal Church USA in 1979. No "Queers"


7 posted on 02/25/2005 8:17:49 AM PST by Blake#1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota

This schism is exactly the goal of the liberal movement.

The real issue is too follow the money, here the property holdings alone of ECUSA exceeds $2 Billion, then there are foundations and investments.

Andrew Sullivan on C-Span stated that homosexual acceptance would not occur until the homosexual lobby had control of a mainstream religion and its resources.


8 posted on 02/25/2005 8:18:08 AM PST by ijcr (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pendragon_6

Finally! I'm thankful that in the end the worldwide Anglican Church did the right thing concerning the liberalization of the church in America and Canada. It's time for the Americans to return to a biblical basis for their doctrine which should not include homosexuals as priests or bishops.


9 posted on 02/25/2005 8:23:26 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blake#1

Hello. :) Indeed the Anglican Province of Christ the King did do exactly that; it split away. And thank goodness. But at the time it was not over "homosexuality" explicitly, as I recall. Changes in the prayer book, no?


10 posted on 02/25/2005 8:26:34 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ijcr

Bingo. Am I the only one who recalls parishioners locked out of their own churches for refusal to "adhere" to the new schizm within the church, of course, their latest is to ordain an open homosexual. Yes, they were thereby, "sanctioning female and gays" able to "seize" churches. The real estate value is awesome to behold.


11 posted on 02/25/2005 8:28:33 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alia

You are correct. My very short answer left out much of the history.


12 posted on 02/25/2005 8:30:23 AM PST by Blake#1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pendragon_6
When this first came out and the talk of a schism was mentioned, I thought they wouldn't split because of the money. Each side stood to lose a huge amount. Even in religion it comes down to the green, apparently.
13 posted on 02/25/2005 8:31:51 AM PST by Tigerjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
Yes, I see your point. Unfortunately nothing is as simple as it should be. I confess I don't' know much about religion per se. For instance I don't know what are the 'differences' between Anglicans and Catholics (I am sure there are many).

But in the Catholic church - I thought! - we were pretty well defined in terms of sodomy practices. It's a SIN, period. Not only a sin, but a major sin, because it attempts to 'promote' it among society at large.

It's only now, or so it seems, the CC has becoming so wishy washy on many areas and to no surprise, we have found out the CC has been infiltrated with perverts of different types for years now, which brings me back to the pope, whom I used to admire deeply. Why did he not TAKE ANY ACTION against what everyone knew (ther pletny of rumors) had been going on for so many years. Why????? is my questions.

Can anyone explain to me why would a father allow his children to be abused and do nothing?
14 posted on 02/25/2005 8:36:52 AM PST by ElPatriota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tigerjam

Does anybody here know who actually has title to the property of the Anglican Church here in the USA and whether the international Anglican Church can excommunicate the offending US and Canadian bishops? It looks like this schism could produce everlasting litigation over the church's property.


15 posted on 02/25/2005 8:39:13 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
the property holdings alone of ECUSA exceeds $2 Billion, then there are foundations and investments

It would be interesting to do a study of this. But I suspect that the invested capital is probably not enough, by itself, to maintain these very expensive churches. Your typical Episcopal church is a stone gothic building of considerable size, probably with slate roof, lead or copper flashing, and all the rest of it. That kind of building can last a long time without maintenance, but when it needs maintenance it can be very expensive. Will it be possible to maintain these buildings without wealthy and substantial congregations?

I used to be an Episcopalian. Your typical congregation used to be the richest people and the oldest families in town. But that is gradually ceasing to be true. Liberal rich people no longer feel that much of a need to attend church or make a show of religion. I think there's a real risk that these folks will take over a huge, expensive network of white elephant churches, while real Christians will move out and build something cheaper for themselves.

People have also said that the Catholic Church is worth trillions. It is, if you count all those art treasures, churches, hospitals, seminaries, colleges, and schools. But they can't be sold, they must be maintained, and the trust funds aren't big enough to do it. You need living and supportive Catholics. Similarly, no matter how wealthy, ECUSA needs living and supportive Episcopalians.

16 posted on 02/25/2005 9:22:28 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota; ninenot
El Patriota: If you have problems with the pope, this probably is not the thread in which to raise it nor the week to raise it.

While the pope is Polish, his job is different from that of Andy Sipowicz on NYPD Blue and the job description of pope is a bit beyond micromanaging such as the Massachusetts convicts NAMBLA Shanley and dead Geoghan. That was supposed to be Bernard Cardinal Law's job. Fill in the blanks for other dioceses and malefactors.

He is pope, not superbureaucrat. His participation against the Iron Curtain with Reagan and Thatcher brought about real results. Papacies are best viewed in the rear view mirror after they have concluded.

If you are still Catholic, let the Episcopaliens and the Anglicans have their own discussions. If you are no longer Catholic, then the internal governance of the Roman Catholic Church is not your personal concern.

17 posted on 02/25/2005 9:48:25 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.

If you want on/off the ping list see my profile page.

18 posted on 02/25/2005 9:52:16 AM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (''Go though life with a Bible in one hand and a Newspaper in the other" -- Billy Graham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Anglicans give ultimatum to pro-gay liberals
By Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent
(Filed: February 25 2005

The worldwide Anglican Church was heading towards schism last night as its leaders prepared to force out the pro-homosexual liberal Americans and Canadians.

In a move that will send shockwaves around the world, the primates of the 70 million-strong Church are expected to issue an ultimatum today demanding that the liberals "withdraw and consider their position".

The final communique is still being drawn up, but it is certain to represent a victory for the conservative majority who have demanded discipline for bishops who defy official Church policy.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, is understood to have backed the uncompromising stance after week-long talks in Northern Ireland failed to achieve reconciliation.

Though privately sympathetic with the liberals, he has fought to preserve unity because he does not want to be the archbishop who presides over the break-up of the international Communion.

The development will dismay liberals across the world, and may prompt protests and even resignations from prominent C of E clerics.

Observers believe that the primates have pressed the Americans and Canadians to withdraw voluntarily because they do not have powers to suspend or expel them.

Insiders said that the Americans, who triggered the crisis by consecrating Anglicanism's first openly homosexual bishop, must decide whether they want to remain part of the Communion. In the meantime, it is understood they will no longer be participants in Anglican summits.

As a condition of being restored, they will be required to concede that their unilateral actions were wrong and pledge not to repeat them. A similar set of conditions may apply to the Canadians, the main supporters of the American position.

It is understood, however, that both the Americans and the Canadians made it clear at this week's meeting, which was being held in a remote Roman Catholic retreat centre near Newry, that they were highly unlikely to reverse their deeply held convictions.

The focus of the talks was the Windsor report, commissioned by Dr Williams in 2003 to try to heal the rifts created by the consecration of the Rt Rev Gene Robinson as Bishop of New Hampshire.

Bishop Frank Griswold, the liberal Presiding Bishop of the American Episcopal Church, is expected to make an initial reaction to the communique today before returning to the US. But observers believe that the Americans - and possibly the Canadians - may never regain their full status within the Anglican Communion - resulting in formal schism.


19 posted on 02/25/2005 9:55:34 AM PST by Brian Allen (I fly and can therefore be envious of no man -- Per Ardua ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota
You can't take action on rumors. I don't know why the Pope hasn't clamped down on run amuck libs in the Church, but even with them trying to change things, the basic teachings of the Church have NOT changed, and those who have tried for many years are now graying and retiring, and those coming up to take their place are more conservative and traditional than they were. I think that's the legacy of JPII. His strength in pronouncing the truth gave support to those of us who needed ammo in fighting the libs and teaching the young people those truths.

Remember, most of the Archbiships and Cardinals in place in the US who created a lot of the mess were NOT appointed by JPII, but by Paul VI, who was much more open to the push of the liberals after Vatican II.

I'm not about to leave the Church I love because some liberal idiots are trying to change things. I'll push back and make sure they don't get their way. I've done this for the last 30 years by being active in the Parishes in which I live. In the absence of any opposition, they did get their way in many places, and the lack of vocations is a direct result of that. Why dedicate your life to a Church that doesn't seem to stand up for it's teachings? You'll notice that those Dioceses that have Bishops who are strong on the teachings of the Church do NOT have a 'crisis' in vocations, it's really only the more liberal ones.

20 posted on 02/25/2005 10:06:56 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson