Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: furball4paws

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050212/bob9.asp


6 posted on 02/20/2005 10:46:07 AM PST by big bad easter bunny (I live so far beyond my means it could be said we live apart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: big bad easter bunny

Thanks bunny. I must have mistyped it in the original post.


10 posted on 02/20/2005 10:52:17 AM PST by furball4paws (It's not the cough that carried him off - it's the coffin they carried him off in (O. Nash -I think))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: big bad easter bunny
For example, large animals generally have longer life spans than small animals, but small dogs live longer than large ones.

One reason may be that dogs are the same species, and what you have are faults off a form. The correlation between size and age does seem to hold up well for species. it seems to be somewhat inverted within species...probably due to things like heart problems, and structural breakdowns.

The really big exception is human life-span. As I recall, we should only live to be about 40, based on our size.

14 posted on 02/20/2005 11:12:40 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson