[Angry Republican]

Do the Rats need more evidence to show why we went to Iraq?

[anniegetyourgun]

Eerie....to say the least.....

[Desdemona]

If this is true, will the Congress FINALLY revoke the UN charter?

This is beyond maddening. I sincerely hope there is evidence to back this up.

[Luddite Patent Counsel]

IF this pans out, it seems to me that the U.N. warrants the same treatment as the Taliban.

[srm913]

Very little surprises me anymore, but my jaw dropped to the floor when I read the title to this thread.
I pray that this doesn't blow over. The ramifications are too vast.
The tentacles of Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Islamofascism, and the U.N. entwine and slither in places even the most ardent conspiracy theorists could never envision.
Mind-boggling.

[Earthdweller]

While the inception of Iraq's financial relationship with al Qaida pre-dated the 1996 Oil for Food program, the U.N. jackpot enabled Saddam to become much more generous towards his terrorist allies in the years before 9/11.
-----
The peels of this onion are unraveling faster than anyone can keep up with them..and who..ohhhhh..who gave Saddam the most money? None other than the French crapweasel himself. Who is so Anti-American and Antisemitic?

[mewzilla]

Money is fungible. Even if Saddamn and OFF didn't fund 9-11 directly, the money he and it provided no doubt freed up other funds. Either way the people behind OFF need to be rounded up so that they can be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

[FreedomPoster]

Ping. This is a biggie, if we get some solid evidence.

[RepublicanReptile]

bump for a later more in depth read

[Brian328i]

How deep does the pile have to get before people realize this?

[Taggart_D]

Can John Kerry now explain again why he wanted UN approval for the invasion of Iraq? Excuse me Mr. Kerry....where are you??? Hello???

[samtheman]

Why isn't this repeated more loudly on Fox News? Saddam was DEEPLY involved in 9/11.

[lonevoice]

Ping for important developing news

[secretagent]

"Saddam had given $300,000 in cash to Ayman Al Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden's number two man, in the spring of 1998," the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes told WABC Radio's Monica Crowley.

How does Hayes know this? Unnamed sources mean no sources.

[Rosie405]

This explains a lot doesn't it? Like, the UNs obvious attempt to thwart Bush's re-election, and Annan's desperate attempts to block Volker's access to some of the records he needs in order to gain a thorough insight into the Oil for Food scandal. No wonder they were scared to death of the possibility of a 2nd Bush administration and a solid Republican majority in the House and Senate. Annan knew durn good and well exactly where that money was going and what it was going to be used for. And then the Demcorats get so hot under the collar when their "patriotism" is questioned? Give me a break.

[Tacis]

No, the "most shocking" will be when we can p[rove that Willie took Saddam's money to "not damage" OBL and that they met fairly often (or, their reps met) to work out details and pass cash. That is the main reason the dems have maintained their idiocy of presenting an opinion(lie) as absolute fact.

Every time some dem whines, "There is no connection between Iraq/Saddam and OBL/terrorism," he's not attacking Bush's rationale for freeing Iraq, he's protecting Willie. That is why it is so important to match lieberry donations, Willie's pardons, Oil-forFood "beneficiaries", oil voucher recipients and, just for the heck of it, Rose Law firm clients to highlight all the connections!

[dzzrtrock]

Dan Rather didn't say it, so I don't believe it (A little "twilght zone" music, maestro)

[backhoe]

Crosslinking to:

Click this picture & go to the "last" for the latest UN scandals:

[the invisib1e hand]

I thought so from the beginning. You'd have to be an apologist for terrorism to not think so.

[Bullish]

No amount of proof will ever sway the leftists from their anti everything Bush position.