Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato

Does anyone know if a source gives you bad information whether a reporter is still obligated to maintain the source's confidentiality?

We just lost cable....but hey, maybe CBS will postpone again.


852 posted on 09/15/2004 1:40:02 PM PDT by Peach (The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies ]


To: Peach

The pundits I've heard on TV say there is no obligation to protect a source if they've given you bogus info.


853 posted on 09/15/2004 1:46:55 PM PDT by tsmith130 ("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
Does anyone know if a source gives you bad information whether a reporter is still obligated to maintain the source's confidentiality? Nothing in the law or the Constitution requires, or even allows, them to protect their sources in the face of crimal or civil court actions. They like to pretend the first amendment freedom of the press allows this, and some judges go along. However the first amendment protects freedom of the press that is the freedom to publish whatever you want, but I for one don't see where it protects liars and frauds from the consequences of their actions. It also provides no protection for those who would protect liars and frauds.
855 posted on 09/15/2004 1:52:09 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson