Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JoeGar

Did the mechanical engineer check with chemical engineers to verify the existence or an explanation of their absence, of chemical residues from such an operation?

Did he detail the chemicals, and how much would have been required? Explain where they came from or how they were produced? How they were transported? What supporting infrastructure would have been required?

What was the 'power' used for; how was it transmitted/carried/stored; where are the devices it powered?

Why are there no records of this?

Not asking you to explain it; just wondering if his book did?

If he did, was it at all plausible; or, just an 'interesting read'?


32 posted on 09/04/2004 12:57:44 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ApplegateRanch
... was it at all plausible; or, just an 'interesting read'?

It was all plausible from a mechanical engineering point of view. I don't remember any chemical engineering comments -- it's been a while since I read the book -- except that the shafts (too small for humans) were, in theory, used to pour chemicals into the main chamber for combining.

43 posted on 09/04/2004 3:12:45 PM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: ApplegateRanch
Here's a link to the title, found in a post in the earlier topic.
49 posted on 09/04/2004 3:55:27 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson