Skip to comments.
Martha Stewart Calls Prosecution A Circus Event
EconomicBriefing.com ^
Posted on 07/16/2004 8:08:14 AM PDT by toaster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: blau993
Lost something like $30 million when the price of her company's stock dropped. Sure she did. sarcasm off
Today her stock in the company went up 98 million dollars. She will have enough money to appeal.
To: js1138
Are you telling me that it is now a felony in America for a person being questioned by the police to assert their innocence? No, but it was, and continues to be, a federal crime to lie to FBI agents. She did so. End of story.
22
posted on
07/16/2004 8:28:15 AM PDT
by
Chad Fairbanks
(Stop thinking, and end your problems. — Lao Tzu)
To: RoseofTexas
"Filthy rich folk usually NEVER pay the penalty!!" Yea!! Let's all hate the rich!!(/sarcasm)
The rich pay for everything, everyday, for us all. As a consequence, they pay penalties for everything, everyday, for us all.
But; there is always your appreciation to make it all worth while.
23
posted on
07/16/2004 8:28:26 AM PDT
by
laotzu
To: ClaireSolt
Martha is a Democrat. She has automatic rights to vindication. In Fact if she could find a way to blame W for her actions she would get a lot more sympathy from the media.
To: toaster
Martha,
Face up to it. It was not a personal matter that was blown out of proportion. I was a matter of you violating Federal security laws. And then, it was a matter of you publicly lying about it.
And the irony is that the drug that was not approved by the FDA and the reason you sold is now approved and Imclone is trading @ $80 (you claim to have had a sell order @ $60)
Now this clears it up. You made a bad sell order and you are pissed because you have lost major $ over a simple small quantity stock ownership deal.
To: Chad Fairbanks
If she would have just shut up she would not be in this position. She came forward with information that turned out to be a lie. If anything she should have been charged for giving a false report.
To: blau993
Lost something like $30 million when the price of her company's stock dropped.
Paper losses are not real until you sell the stock. I suppose that if you invested $100 in a stock and it went up to $100,000 the next day and then dropped back to $100 a day later you would say that you lost $99,900?
27
posted on
07/16/2004 8:33:33 AM PDT
by
LetsRok
To: Brilliant
the feminists at usa today said she shouldn't get a sentence, that she should get probation to teach women.
also, usa today said that lea fastow shouldn't get prison because she was the daughter of a millionaire, implying that her husband, andrew, who did not grow up with wealth, was the guilty one. apparently by this emoting, rich women aren't guilty!
To: blau993
But some people don't like Martha, therefore they think the railroading is justified. Martha got in the way of a federal government that was trying to distract people from its own misdeeds.
To: bikepacker67; ClaireSolt
"So it's OK to lie to the FBI - assuming you're one of the elite?" ClaireSolt seemed to be under the impression there was insider trading.....as evidenced in the quote I clearly provided.
I made no inference to the legitamacy of lieing to the FBI.
As to assuming I'm one of the elite......thank you very much.
30
posted on
07/16/2004 8:34:40 AM PDT
by
laotzu
I myself am surprised here at all the defenders. That she was not under oath is a red herring--she lied (after engaging her lawyers) and participated in a conspiracy where the principal Waksal got serious time. I wonder if the Martha defenders would sing the same song if it was John Q. Public lying to the feds during a terrorism investigation and thwarting the timely finding of the facts. Martha made a choice: fess up and pay (much less) the piper or assume an arrogant in your face attitude. She made the wrong one.....
31
posted on
07/16/2004 8:36:00 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(May karma come back to the presstitutes and Rats in a material way.....)
To: eleni121
I beg your pardon, this is rather PERSONAL....... :o)
32
posted on
07/16/2004 8:36:12 AM PDT
by
traumer
To: toaster
Martha Stewart and former President Clinton violated the exact same law. President Clinton was not even fired from his job and never served a single day in jail.
Martha Stewart was sentenced to 5 months in jail, followed by 5 months home detention. Stewart also received 2 years probation and a fine of $30,000.
Now, can anyone explain to me why a private citizen is held to a higher standard than the President of the United States?
This is disgusting!
33
posted on
07/16/2004 8:36:50 AM PDT
by
Hunble
To: toaster
"During home detention she will be required to wear an electronic monitoring device"
Thank God.... otherwise, she might try to sneak out and steal a car to do a driveby shooting or such.
Free Martha!
To: laotzu
I wasn't assuming your status as an elite, but a smart guy like you already knew that.
To: toaster
Martha Stewart Calls Prosecution A Circus EventI'm sure that will help the appeal.
36
posted on
07/16/2004 8:37:28 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: SirBuck911
"I was a matter of you violating Federal security laws." No. It was not.
Why do so many insist on selling, and repeating this lie?
37
posted on
07/16/2004 8:38:09 AM PDT
by
laotzu
To: pgkdan
This whole prosecution is bogus. I'm no fan of Martha stewart but since when in America do we prosecute folks for "lying" to the FBI during the course of an investigation of a crime for which we're never charged?
Our whole rule of law assumes that people will tell the truth when questioned by the government. I would support 5 years minimum for ANYONE who lies to a government official regardless if they part of an investigation. Lying costs the taxpayers more money by prolonging an investigation. I hate liars and anyone who accepts lying as a legitimate way of doing business.
38
posted on
07/16/2004 8:38:42 AM PDT
by
LetsRok
To: Orange1998
Thats how most people get in trouble. The old "The coverup is worse than the crime" adage still applies... Had she just kept her mouth shut, she wouldn't be in this mess.
Personally, I think she should sue her lawyer because he didn't tell her to shut the hell up. He didn't do his job.
39
posted on
07/16/2004 8:38:57 AM PDT
by
Chad Fairbanks
(Stop thinking, and end your problems. — Lao Tzu)
To: toaster
Following the sentencing Stewart gave a brief statement outside the court house In which she once more demonstrated the almost psychotic self centeredness and nastness for which she was actually convicted.
The charge was nonsense, but when half the people in the country hate your personality and would love a chance to punch you out, you are gonna get convicted.
So9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson