Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese produce new type of sub (US intelligence is surprised)
Washington Times ^ | July 16, 2004 | Bill Gertz

Posted on 07/15/2004 10:57:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion

China's naval buildup has produced a new type of attack submarine that U.S. intelligence did not know was under construction, according to U.S. defense and intelligence officials.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; china; chinesemilitary; gertz; submarine; trade; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
It seems more often our intel services UNDERestimate the threat and capabilities of other countries.

They had no idea about this development, they terribly underestimated Lybia's capabilities..

I think this is more worrysome, than the possibility that they overestimated Iraq's capabilities (which I still don't think has been proven, the WMD may turn up yet)

I think the main reason is that the Dems hamstrung the intel services by virtually eliminating human intel.

1 posted on 07/15/2004 10:57:59 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Not good news.


2 posted on 07/15/2004 11:03:33 PM PDT by GVnana (Tagline? I don't need no stinkin' tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

3 posted on 07/15/2004 11:03:52 PM PDT by nuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Ah yes, Our wonderful "intelligence" at work. The long-term national security threat is not from terrorism but from Red China.


4 posted on 07/15/2004 11:04:16 PM PDT by icebats22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Re: overestimated Iraq's capabilities

Policy wonks (The ones who shouldn't run the intel) poo-pooed the insurgentcy terrorist rebellion post-war senerios.

5 posted on 07/15/2004 11:10:45 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; wretchard; blam; Travis McGee; Jeff Head; Squantos; Lazamataz; Perlstein; ...
One thing that has languished is sub-surface point defense.

Consider that even back in WW2, a single sailor throwing a single hand grenade into the water at the right time and place (read: luck) could stop a torpedo attack or an enemy diver.

But today, when we have vast computational resources available, we still haven't established automated mortar and depth charge systems to protect our surface ships from sub-surface attacks (e.g. torpedos).

Instead, the perfumed princes amidst our admiralty are spending vast amounts of our Navy budget on glory items like rail guns (stand off weapons).

Sad.

Technologically, torpedos, even supercavitating designs, are obsolete (we have the sensors and the computing power to explode underwater ordinance in precisely the manner required to defeat all such attacks)...but *operationally*, they are still a threat simply because our Defense funds have been misappropriated for things other than sub-surface point defense.

11 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

6 posted on 07/15/2004 11:14:06 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Yet another failure of the intelligence community in the US...we need an overall. This is a dangerous time with extreme needs for accurate and reliable info...God help us


7 posted on 07/15/2004 11:16:26 PM PDT by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Gee, and where are they getting all this money to build all these subs? From us. Because the Republicans in the house and senate decided that MFN status for China is just dandy.

We embargo a little $#!# hole island like Cuba with no regrets, but we allow multi billion dollar trade with our worst enemy on the planet?

Hello? Is anybody awake at the controls?

8 posted on 07/15/2004 11:17:41 PM PDT by Critter (...an online gathering place for sissy boy, girlie men, nanny staters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Critter
"Because the Republicans in the house and senate decided that MFN status for China is just dandy."

Actually, Senator Edwards voted "Aye" for PNTR for China, Critter.

11 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

9 posted on 07/15/2004 11:21:18 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Southack

So did Nancy Johnson (R-CT) and a host of other Republicrats.


10 posted on 07/15/2004 11:23:00 PM PDT by Critter (...an online gathering place for sissy boy, girlie men, nanny staters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; GVgirl; icebats22; A. Pole; RussianConservative
What does one think when we export our know how and technology transfer out consumer goods to China? All one needs to do to make a cheap electronic good can be then used to upgrade military development.

The thinking of the free traders -almost cult like - is that if nations are in trade relations with each other it prevents wars because the love of making money outweighs the base emotions that go into waging war - though I don't know why the love of making money is not viewed as a base emotion by these free traders.

Of course they tend to overlook the fact that in some cultures making money is the base emotion and that sacrifice in the name of nationalisim/religion, etc is viewed as more important. Of course the free trade cultists will tell you that they purpose of free trade is in reality subversion of this fact and that free trade and the love of money/trade/commercial goods/leisure time that will come from that will do the converting away from hot nationalism and all "isims".

We shall see where this free trade cult leads us.

11 posted on 07/15/2004 11:23:39 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Critter; Southack

bump


12 posted on 07/15/2004 11:24:52 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Destro
What does one think when we export our know how and technology transfer out consumer goods to China? All one needs to do to make a cheap electronic good can be then used to upgrade military development.

Slight problem; this sub, like 98% of China's military tech, is overwhelmingly RUSSIAN technology.

And most of the rest is French or Israeli technology.

13 posted on 07/15/2004 11:31:21 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jnarcus

Gertz is a hypemonger.


14 posted on 07/15/2004 11:32:00 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
I am not talking about actual sub building technology they learned from America per say - just that the quality control that comes from building commercial electronics or palstic goods causes an improvement in other areas.

Imagine Russian technology married with American/Japanese standards of quality control?

15 posted on 07/15/2004 11:35:52 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Southack

83 Yays, 15 Nays, and 2 abstaining.

Sounds like a fair number of pubbies in the senate like China.


16 posted on 07/15/2004 11:42:56 PM PDT by Critter (...an online gathering place for sissy boy, girlie men, nanny staters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Well it doesn't matter whether the tech is Israeli ,Russian or Ugandan-if it's good,it is going to be a threat-simple as that.Besides the Chinese have the money-why can't they get quality items.I don't think u will see a lot of Israeli stuff in China now-they've pretty much stopped all sales since about 2001 due to a combination of American pressure &Chinese treason(selling to Syria,Iran et al).

About this particular sub-it is probably a modified variant of the 'Song' class diesel sub-the first variants of the Song was riddled with problems,forcing them to buy the Russian kilos.The Song class was designed to operate the C-802/803 anti-ship missiles,much in the same category as the French exocet&US harpoon.But ud have a real problem if they equip it with the brandnew Russian 'KLUB'anti-ship/land attack cruise missiles.These missiles have been ordered for eight new kilo class subs being built in Russia.These are supersonic &could pose a real threat to American ships(let alone Taiwanese)&possibly could be used for a strike on US bases in Japan


17 posted on 07/15/2004 11:48:16 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Don't worry - the Chinese just stole more top top secrets at Los Alamos for the third time in the last 8 months, in addition to the times under Xlinton.


18 posted on 07/15/2004 11:57:59 PM PDT by XBob (Free-traitors steal our jobs for their profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Southack

And thank Klinton for dismantling the SOSUS system. There could be 20 Chicom subs 200 yds off the MIA coast and we'd never know it.


19 posted on 07/16/2004 1:03:17 AM PDT by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Indie

When did that happen???


20 posted on 07/16/2004 1:31:16 AM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson