Posted on 07/14/2004 8:14:47 PM PDT by Kaslin
Vice President Dick Cheney has destroyed himself and is creating a mess for President Bush, says one of the nation’s premier political analysts.
Larry Sabato, Director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, offered the cutting assessment in his online analysis "Crystal Ball.” Even though John Kerry hasn’t received the usual bounce after naming his running mate, Sabato writes in his latest newsletter that the Democrat campaign "has put George W. Bush in a box with the selection of John Edwards. And there is probably no way for Bush to win this part of the presidential battle.”
"To put it bluntly, Cheney has blown it,” the straight-shooting Sabato wrote.
He continued: "One would have expected a classic Washington establishment insider to know how to keep his reputation intact through innumerable controversies -- calling the ‘right’ people here, consulting the ‘wise’ men and women of D.C. there, taking the puffed-up press poobahs of the Capital City to lunch at the White House here and there.
"Anybody recall how Henry Kissinger came out of the Nixon sleaze and the Vietnam disaster smelling like a bouquet of yellow roses--at least with the bunch that counts in D.C. and New York--despite the fact that he was in both situations up to his eyeballs?
"Instead of being Kissinger, Cheney has been Nixon in the Bush term. He has hunkered down in the White House and ‘undisclosed locations.’ He's been uncommunicative with the broader public and unconcerned about his image until it's too late. He's often appeared to be the sinister puppeteer, pulling Bush's strings on critical matters like Iraq.
"He's more associated with the Halliburton scandal than anything else in the public mind. And most importantly from a political standpoint, Dick Cheney is now seen as a rigid ideologue, unconcerned about facts that do not fit into his preconceived notions of the world, too closely tied to the far right and too unacceptable to the voters as a whole to be what he once was: workable standby equipment, a potential president who could take office with popular support.
"In short, Cheney has failed his president and become a significant liability.”
Despite all of Edwards’ flaws – his "single term of office in the Senate has been remarkably undistinguished, noted mainly for his overweening ambition,” and he has "a left-wing voting record and a shockingly low attendance record on roll call votes that would make any serious senator blush with embarrassment,” this extremist but telegenic lightweight looks good in comparison with Cheney, Sabato says.
He notes something NewsMax has already pointed out: the media establishment’s enormous hypocrisy in gushing over Edwards even though it attacked the far more experienced nominee Dan Quayle as being too green for the office.
"Be that as it may, there is a deeper story here: The thin resume of Edwards looks so much better because the thick resume of Cheney now looks so bad.”
He concludes Bush is stuck.
"The streets of Washington's political district are filled with rumors and scenarios where Cheney disappears from the GOP ticket. Yet if Bush drops Cheney, the party conservatives -- ever sensitive to a slight -- will wail and gnash their teeth, threaten to go fishing on Election Day, and ruin any bounce Bush might get from a substitute veep.
"If Cheney wants Bush to win, he might want to help the process along by stepping aside. Have you stopped laughing yet? We all know that Cheney still labors under the illusion that he is a plus for Bush, and if doubts ever occur to him, the addiction of the power and the glory of high office acts quickly to banish the thought.”
Hey Larry, go @#$@ yourself! LOL
I think he is mad that he didn't get wined and dined, and is thus venting his spleen (eeewwwwwww....).
Maybe Cheney, unlike Sabato, realizes that the media hotshots who used to call the shots don't anymore.
I'm sure GW is giving all of the "ya gotta dump Cheney" advice from the elitists and the media all of the attention that it is due.
It must be something like that
He is 100% right. It is too bad people would rather remain in denial than do what is necessary to win.
A liberal University employee wrote this dribble. I hate it when my tax dollars go to biased puke-heads with a "University Director" label that gives the false impression that they have a brain.
Sabato is wrong a lot. Watch how wrong he is when Cheney slices and dices the ambulance chaser in the debates.
What complete and total B.S.
Cheney's personal negatives are off the chart. He needs to feign some health problem and drop out.
Wow. It's not that I never thought Sabato would be wrong, it's that I never thought he'd be this wrong! It reads like something that would be found on Indymedia!
I like Cheney, always have. I remember saying in high school (early 90s) that he'd make a great President. There's this "dump Cheney" bandwagon, and for a minute, I almost fell for it too. I gave it some thought and realize he's only an asset to Bush.
you've gotta be kidding? charm and charisma usually wins TV debates. True, Lloyd Bentsen gave the beatdown on Dan Quayle, but trial lawyer Edwards is a tad sharper than Quayle.
Cheney is the Man, the more the press slanders him the more I know he's the right guy to be there.
You drinking?
All started by Democrats -- and furthered by the Democrat media.
All proof that the 'Rats want Cheney gone. Big time. Cheney vs Edwards is going to make for an interesting debate -- the Big Dog vs the Puppy.
Dick Cheney is, perhaps, the finest, most accomplished Vice President to have ever served his country.
Sabato? A liberal media mouthpiece. And I resent Newsmax's editorial remark calling him a "straight shooter".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.