Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/17/2004 5:02:46 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: RWR8189

James Thompson (R) is discussing this right now on Bill O'Reilly show.


2 posted on 06/17/2004 5:05:32 PM PDT by buffyt (Clinton has MALIGNANT NARCISSISTIC personality disODER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Thanks for posting this!

Related Item:

Bush: Iraq Linked With Al Qaeda

3 posted on 06/17/2004 5:06:31 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
FReepers pointed this out in advance
4 posted on 06/17/2004 5:06:41 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Borger still had her Clinton kneepads on. And was also wearing a blue dress with a stain on it. You could not see the stain however, it was covered by the Kerry in 04 button she was wearing.


5 posted on 06/17/2004 5:06:47 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage (Kerry is a threat to national security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Great!!!!


6 posted on 06/17/2004 5:06:55 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

good week for the VP, I think


7 posted on 06/17/2004 5:08:52 PM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Gov. Thompson particularly outraged by the NYT article..


8 posted on 06/17/2004 5:09:25 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

BTTT


9 posted on 06/17/2004 5:09:36 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Al-Qaeda may still be operating in Iraq. Fortunately, Saddam Hussein is not. At least, he is no longer in the command structure of the few remaining Ba'athist forces.


10 posted on 06/17/2004 5:10:08 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Fox News tonight shows the two co-chairs of the commission both clearly state (today) that there WAS a clear connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda.

The commissioners (one D and the other R) said they didn't know what all the fuss was about. That the connection between the two was clearly established.


12 posted on 06/17/2004 5:12:57 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Vice Pres. CHENEY: I disagree with the way their findings have been portrayed. This has been enormous confusion over the Iraq-al-Qaida connection,

The media and the libs are playing a parsing game--shades of the Clinton era.

At least the Administration is finally getting people out onto the talk shows to counter the lib lies.

The Admin needs to improve greatly its PR; find ways to circumvent the mainstream media to get their message out; otherwise, the Administration is going to lose the PR war. And that means Kerry will could very well win in November.
14 posted on 06/17/2004 5:13:51 PM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Yes Gloria, The NY Times are a bunch of Clymers.

15 posted on 06/17/2004 5:15:11 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. (a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.

S.J. Resolution 23 - Authorization for Use of Military Force (Enrolled Bill); September 18, 2001

The operative words up there seem to be "aided or harbored."

Did Saddam have to be personally involved in 9/11 for him to have "aided or harbored" those "nations, organizations or persons" who were directly responsible?

Of course not....and evidence of Saddam's personal involvement in a very specific, clandestine decision is unlikely to surface.

17 posted on 06/17/2004 5:17:39 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Well, one Richard Clarke seemed to have thought that there was a connection between Saddam and the terrorists...when he worked for Bubba.
Iraq conspired with Bin Laden to produce WMDs...according to Richard Clarke

...and lets not forget that he was paying off suicide bombers' families to send their kids to blow themselves up for Allah
Salaries For Suicide Bombers
18 posted on 06/17/2004 5:18:17 PM PDT by walford (http://utopia-unmasked.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Hey Media .. Get the plugs out of your ears and PAY ATTENTION

Are you REALLY THAT STUPID???

19 posted on 06/17/2004 5:18:36 PM PDT by Mo1 (That's right Old Media .... WE LOVED PRESIDENT REAGAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
BORGER: Was Iraq involved?

Vice Pres. CHENEY: We don't know.

So why are we there?

20 posted on 06/17/2004 5:19:39 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Cheney's pretty worked up about the press distortions. Borger seems very dense. After a thorough explanation from Cheney she can still ask, "bottom line, though...Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11?" (Patiently, again, he replies, "no evidence." Borger doesn't seem to understand that no-evidence is not the same as no-connection.)


21 posted on 06/17/2004 5:19:58 PM PDT by Graymatter (Let's issue a new $40 bill to honor our 40th president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
John Kerry say this is the worst economy since the Great Depression. That's just wrong. And anybody who hears that says, `What the hell's he talking about?' He doesn't know what he's talking about obviously...

That's the first time I've heard Dick swear.

22 posted on 06/17/2004 5:20:14 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Trent Lott is on O'Reilly. Lott is advocating creation of an Intelligence Czar position to operate out of the White House and to be responsible for many, but not all, of the intelligence agencies that currently exist.

I thought that's what the new Homeland Security Department Secretary was supposed to be.

More government isn't the answer to terrorism.
24 posted on 06/17/2004 5:20:33 PM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

NYT=Pravda.....


25 posted on 06/17/2004 5:20:51 PM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So (Democrats are enemies of the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson